2011/4/30 Sebastian Hohmann :
> Am 30.04.2011 12:10, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
> "motorcar" is supposed to represent the class of "Zeichen 251" (shows a car
> from the front), which forbids all double-tracked motor vehicles (which
> includes hgv and buses etc).
2011/4/30 Stefan Bethke :
> And if you feel you need more classifications, here's a Wikipedia article on
> the EU classification:
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/EG-Fahrzeugklasse (seems there's no English
> version)
There is no English version of this, and it seems to deal only with
trailers an
2011/5/1 David Murn :
> On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 02:10 +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> If I was towing a caravan, I wouldnt set my navigation device to think
> Im in a car or a motorbike, Id most probably use hgv.
this thread is not about hacking your system so that it does roughly
what you want, but
2011/5/1 Andrew Cleveland :
> Can the highway=proposed tag apply to highways which were proposed but
> are no longer?
no, IMHO highway=proposed doesn't apply. This would not be a proposed
(planned) highway but a formerly proposed highway. If you want to put
them into OSM nonetheless (many mappers
2011/5/2 Pieren :
> To stop a beginning of edit war
> (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:historic&action=history),
> I would like try something new and ask your feedback about the tag
> history=event wiki page.
>
> This tag is the result of a former discussion ab
I announce on behalf of Federico Cozzi that voting is open for
service:bicycle
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/service:bicycle
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinf
2011/5/4 fly :
> Am 04.05.2011 10:31, schrieb Richard Mann:
> We just had a discussion on talk-de and the german community about this
> issue.
>
> The problem with footway/cycleway is that they mix access and highway.
Well, this is valid for lots of highway types (implicit access, think
of motorw
2011/5/5 John Smith :
> Even if historic=event is removed from the wiki, and even if
> historic=battlefield is removed I doubt it will stop people mapping
> these locations, they are important to people, and people have already
> shown that there are physical places that can be mapped.
Yes, they
2011/5/5 Andre Engels :
> Unless you are in New Zealand, you're unlikely to tag the same thing:
> It's being used for a Maori fortress, see
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P%C4%81_%28M%C4%81ori%29
IMHO the tag is not very well chosen. Besides that I agree with John
Smith (subtagging as a fortress)
2011/5/5 Simone Saviolo :
> 2011/5/5 John Smith
> Aren't we nitpicking? I've tagged remains of Roman cities whose "physical
> presence" is arguable, but nonetheless those are places of historical
> interest in that a Roman building or forum was there.
Usually you will also find something on the
2011/5/5 Pieren :
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:26 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
> Note that the OP is about historic=event, not battlefield. The edit war
> started because JohnSmith documented what you, Martin, suggested in a
> previous thread although that thread showed a
2011/5/5 Stefan Bethke :
> I've completed the draft and would like to solicit your comments:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Car_access_tag
>
>
> The proposal introduces a new tag car=* that applies to just cars, and
> clarifies the meaning of the motorcar=* tag, which app
2011/5/6 Stefan Bethke :
>> If you introduce a new class you should define to which vehicles it
>> applies. If you can't do it for all countries, do it for your country
>> and let others do it for theirs.
>
> I think you will want to watch the tone you're using.
(?)
> Besides, I don't see an e
2011/5/6 Stefan Bethke :
> Am 06.05.2011 um 12:29 schrieb Nathan Edgars II:
>> Isn't motor_vehicle used for this? In my experience, the English term 'motor
>> vehicle' does not include sub-motorcycle vehicles, such as motorized
>> bicycles. For example, Florida statutes define...
+1, this is th
There is a new draft how to tag advertising objects.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/advertising
Are there any comments on this? What should be added/changed?
According to tagwatch, some of the proposed values are already in use:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/advertisin
2011/5/8 Flaimo :
> no further comments over the last 1 1/2 weeks, so i'll start the
> voting phase: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare
sorry for writing late, I think there are some problems.
E.g. age.
if you tagged a feature with
amenity=childcare
age=4
it would n
2011/5/9 Brad Neuhauser :
> I notice the suggested rendering is similar to schools. Don't know about
> other areas, but in the US, many childcare centers are run out of private
> homes, so that rendering might seem a little strange. Maybe in that case a
> node is a better choice.
The question
2011/5/10 Flaimo :
> Further, i too consider the social facility tags to negative. Besides
> that, i couldn't see a social_facility=* value that would fit. the
> "or=child" part references to an target audience, which would
> correspond more to the "age" tag of my proposal and not the
> amenity=ch
2011/5/11 Josh Doe :
> It's been about a month now, and I've gotten some feedback from the
> talk page. My thoughts are that we either:
>
> * reuse the existing place=suburb (as the wiki definition seems like
> it might work)
> * use the new place=neighbourhood
yes, you can use suburb for all kin
2011/5/11 Colin Smale :
> Of course there can also be parallel
> hierarchies, like police force areas and their districts and subdistricts,
> or postal systems with major towns, distribution points and individual
> postcodes (in the UK these frequently span national borders!).
+1, also think abou
2011/5/11 Nathan Edgars II :
> There's a problem if this is treated like landuse.
it is not "landuse", so there is no problem. There is still space for
landuse=highway.
> The highway landuse goes
> up to the edge of the right-of-way, and includes sidewalks and and clear
> zones, but your exampl
2011/5/11 Ilya Zverev :
> I've reverted his edits of the proposal page, but is he right? Is any
> proposal with incorrect subject line in tagging@ post (let along those
> which weren't mentioned here) automatically invalid?
Well, it is an established convention to send an email to tagging with
"V
2011/5/11 Nathan Edgars II :
> The proposal makes reference to landuse, in particular stating that one
> might cut off adjacent landuses at its border. But the two positions on
> landuse are that it shouldn't be cut or that it should be cut at the
> right-of-way line, not at the edge of the roadway
Actually there is a problem here:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/water#values
"water" is already in wide use, but most of the values in use are not
part of the proposal. Maybe some amendmend or changing of the key name
(e.g. water:type seems to be what the proposal wants to achieve:
http://t
2011/5/11 Tobias Knerr :
> Flaimo wrote:
> In the example image, "lanes" (in this case: sidewalks) of the road that
> are mapped as separate ways also have their own areas. Currently, I tend
> to instead support one area for the entire road, containing the central
> highway ways and the ways for th
2011/5/11 Flaimo :
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare#Voting
I don't see why there should be "service_hours:childcare". Can't we
reuse service_times?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times
cheers,
Martin
___
2011/5/11 :
> Part of the problem is that neighborhoods, unlike official administrative
> units, or even Home Owner Associations, don't necessarily have agreed-upon
> boundaries. Different people may consider the same location to be in
> different neighborhoods.
then it's a node ;-)
serious
2011/5/11 Josh Doe :
> Can we begin discussion of this? A "place_level" that allows for
> unincorporated areas, neighborhoods, and the like.
I am not sure that we need a place_level. Such a key would only make
sense if there was a clear hierarchy. Place structures can be
different overlapping sys
2011/5/12 Flaimo :
> i changed the main key to service_times, but i kept the subkey.
> otherwise it would be problematic in case someone want to tag the
> office hours separately.
IMHO the key service_times refers to the feature, which is children
daycare in this case. There is no need to namespa
2011/5/12 :
> Also, sidewalks are not always directly next to the driving lanes. There are
> sometimes grassy borders between the driving lanes and the sidewalk.
> Typically, this is a meter or so, but can be wider. On one street here in
> Nashville, Tennessee, USA, the sidewalk is about thr
2011/5/12 Sean Horgan :
> I personally like when OSM definitions are linked to other references,
> especially a well-known source like wikipedia.
at least then link to a specific version of an article.
> From http://www.thefreedictionary.com/social+service:
> social service
> n.
> 1. Organized
2011/5/12 Flaimo :
> the reason for that might be, than no editor supports the contact:
> syntax. personally, i always use it and type it in manually without
> the JOSM preset, because it makes locating all the contact information
> in long tag lists much easier.
OSM allows everybody to tag whate
2011/5/12 fly :
> What do we do with dual-carriage ways ?
> Sometimes there exist paved connections between both directions. Maybe
> blocked by a barrier but that is no need.
if they are constantly connected (no change of the paving, no physical
barrier) it's actually not a dual-carriage way. If
2011/5/12 Flaimo :
> when was the topic of webcams ever mentioned?
they are part of the contact-proposal. I mentioned them to point out,
that even if everyone followed this proposal and added "contact:" to
some of the tags, this wouldn't improve overall consistency.
> contact information and wh
2011/5/13 Nathan Edgars II :
> OK, but there's still the issue of a so-called "flush median". I think in a
> rural area with few intersections this would be called a dual carriageway. I
> can't find an image, but Interstate 90 used to have one over Lookout Pass in
> Idaho. You can imagine http://ww
2011/5/13 Nathan Edgars II :
> On 5/13/2011 6:47 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> An emergency vehicle could also cross a grass median if there's no raised
> barrier.
yes, and a person can jump over a 2ft wall and climb a 8ft wall. A
series of bollards is no barrier to bicycles a
2011/5/14 Flaimo :
> any other comments on that proposal? otherwise i'll start the voting phase:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr_keys_%282011-04%29
Yes. You are currently concentrating on the micro level, but there
could be a suggestion for the intermediate scale bet
isn't this information a router could gain from the data simply by
looking where the ramp leads to?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2011/5/16 David Murn :
> I agree. I think seafood is a more generic proposal than 'fishmonger'
> which may not be understood as widely.
I recall this vivid discussion where in the end it was agreed on
shop=seafood (with myself not beeing extremely happy about it, because
I'd personally consider
2011/5/17 David Murn :
> I think fishmonger is the shop/retailer, seafood is the product.
would you use seafood for freshwater fish? And if yes, also if they
sell only freshwater fish?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
2011/5/17 Flaimo :
> something like that should be handled in a seperate proposal, though i
> think most of your examples are covered with addr:housename.
none of this is covered by addr:housename. addr:housename is for
individual names (like "Windsor Castle"), not for descriptions.
cheers,
Mart
2011/5/18 :
> In American usage, seafood covers all aquatic-origin food, whether from fresh
> water, estuaries, or the ocean.
In the context of OSM I am more interested in the British usage.
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreet
2011/5/18 Sam Vekemans :
> I'll also include a Wikipedia word-definition for each value, as the aim for
> this is to not duplicate into other languages, but to 'look at' what the
> other language pages have done, then to a google-translate and fill in the
> details.
You can of course include wiki
2011/5/20 Dave F. :
> Hi
>
> There's a URL to view specific relation versions. Something like:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1318928/version/2
this is not a question for tagging.
The answer is:
http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/1318928/2
cheers,
Martin
___
2011/5/23 Tobias Knerr :
> This implies that the landuse=residential tag would be used on
> smale-scale structures, which I believe should not be done. landuses are
> large-scale areas. When you create a landuse polygon for an individual
> building or garden, you are doing something wrong, imo.
+
2011/5/29 Mihkel Rämmel :
> If it is not right then please correct me.
you can also have a look at start_date which would be inauguration or
start of usage of the building.
> Would building=yes ruins=yes (3000 uses) and building=ruins (850
> uses) mean the same? Which one would be better to
2011/5/27 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:46 PM, John Smith wrote:
>> "I propose the following new tag {{tag|tower:type|lighting}} as follows:"
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tag:man_made%3Dtower&diff=next&oldid=639593
>
> Would this also include stree
looking at the available data and in the wiki I'm currently missing
some tags for monasteries.
All I found is this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonastery
which suggests to tag former monasteries as historic=monastery and the
monastery building as monastery=yes. If I see this
2011/6/1 Peter Wendorff :
> Why not include a weblink to the "reason for the name"?
> That could be a wikipedia-link to the page of the person the name comes from
> - or something else.
The key could be "eponym", but personally I don't see necessity for this.
cheers,
Martin
Vincent, thank you for your valueable feedback.
2011/6/1 Vincent Pottier :
>>> looking at the available data and in the wiki I'm currently missing
>>> some tags for monasteries.
> They are different things to be tagged :
> * the building, that can be tagged in building=monastery ou building=conve
A first draft for monasteries can be found here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/monastery
(I am currently working on this, and will extend the content this afternoon).
Btw.: I found another argument against the use of a community-tag
(against the tag name): there seem to be a
2011/6/3 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer :
> A first draft for monasteries can be found here:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/monastery
> (I am currently working on this, and will extend the content this afternoon).
OK, I arrived at a point where this should be reviewed b
2011/6/3 Josh Doe :
> I would use highway=steps on the steps, and highway=footway for the
> walk along the water.
Yes, but probably not on the ladder that gives you access to (or from)
the water. I'd tag this on a node (the alternative would be to draw a
way with 2 nodes, set layer-tags to the no
I am currently preparing a proposal for monasteries and part of them
is generally also a dormitory. By looking up the wiki I found this
page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Ddormitory
which does limit the use to "sleeping and living quarters for
University students, provided by th
2011/6/4 David Murn :
> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 15:36 +0200, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> How would you tag steps that provide access to water? See here:
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/rhodes/5793021284
>
> Im trying to map a similar situation, except in my case the bottom 2
> steps are unde
2011/6/5 Steve Bennett :
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:10 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> I have at least 2 problems with this definition:
>>
>> 1. It doesn't seem to be a British English term (at least not with
>> this definition)
>> 2. It seems to excl
2011/6/6 Alessio Zanol :
> Hello,
> this is my feature proposal:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Club
>
> Please discuss here or even better in the discussion page on the
> wiki.
I think that here is a better place to have discussions, that's why I
reply here.
I like this
2011/6/6 Brad Neuhauser :
> I think it'd make sense to broaden the definition:
> "Sleeping and living quarters provided by an institution for (large numbers
> of) people associated with that institution. For example, housing for
> university students."
in the case of a monastery it is not a quar
2011/6/6 Brad Neuhauser :
> why not just stick with building=residential then?
actually in the case of a monastery I would prefer dormitory because
it is a dedicated place for sleeping, not for living. There are other
buildings for other aspects of "residential" in a monastery from which
I would
2011/6/6 Brad Neuhauser :
> If you want to split that hair, "sleeping_quarters" would be a lot more
> clear in English than dormitorium. From your earlier comment on quarters,
> it sounds like you might be confused by this term, but "quarters" can apply
> to a single structure or part of a structu
2011/6/7 Steve Bennett :
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Brad Neuhauser
> wrote:
>> I think it'd make sense to broaden the definition:
>> "Sleeping and living quarters provided by an institution for (large numbers
>> of) people associated with that institution. For example, housing for
>> univ
2011/6/7 Alessio Zanol :
> In data lunedì 6 giugno 2011 15:13:42, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer ha scritto:
>> A last side note: someone mentioned recently on the German ML that
>> sport=xy should not be used to describe any kinds of sports but only
>> places where you actually ca
2011/6/8 John Smith :
> On 8 June 2011 10:08, David Murn wrote:
>> In Australia, 'going to the club' means (generally) going to a licenced
>> members-only venue,
this is true for many parts of the world I believe, and why I
questioned the actual decision for "club" as key (but still supporting
t
2011/6/14 Nathan Edgars II :
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83524747/history
> No comment.
you are actually missusing the access-tag because it is intended for
legal restrictions and not for recommendations. Why not use another
tag? Their number is not limited...
cheers,
Martin
_
2011/6/14 Sander Deryckere :
> It's Paul Johnson who introduced the tag, not Nathan.
>
> Your comment is right, but you should point it to Paul Johnson instead.
yes, I saw this, he kept it, so they're sitting in the same boat ;-)
Cheers,
Martin
___
Ta
2011/6/14 Flaimo :
> the wiki page doesn't say that the restriction need to be of a legal
> kind.
How else can you interpret: "Description For describing the legal
accessibility of an element." ?
> access=no could also mean that it is physically not accessible
> even though it might be allowed
2011/6/14 Nathan Edgars II :
> It would be more useful to say why they should avoid, like maxheight=*.
btw.:
maxheight is a legal restriction as well.
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tag
2011/6/19 Andre Engels :
> And in that case, only_left_turn or
> only_right_turn would seem applicable.
+1
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2011/6/22 Pieren :
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Josh Doe wrote:
>>
>> I removed the yes and no values, because I couldn't see any utility,
>> instead offering the "unknown" value.
>>
>
> I don't think it is a good idea. In fact, the 'yes' value is widely used in
> OSM when you don't know the
what about introducing a kerb:height ? Implying heights from values
like "yes", "raised", "normal" will probably not be very reliable or
stable as this might vary from country to country and also in
different cities/neighbourhoods.
cheers,
Martin
___
Ta
2011/6/25 John Smith :
> Wasn't there some discussion about that before, how important airports
> such as LAX should show sooner than regional airports which should
> show up sooner than grass airstrips.
Yes, the discussions and proposals are endless for this. Suggestions
are usually that you sho
2011/6/29 David Murn :
> Well, technically if were mapping whats on the ground, a lot of
> restaurant signs say "Drive thru". The wiki has a redirect from
> drive_thru to drive_through, with 4 occurances of 'drive thru' on the
> page, but no explanation about why the tag uses the British English
>
2011/6/30 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> In April 2010, I first suggested having another value (namely,
> service=drive_thru) for the service=* tag for drive-through lanes
> similar to service=parking_aisle:
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2010-April/001710.html
> Based on the response
Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
barrier values.
Please comment now on this, before we can eventually vote to get this
to a more definite status:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
Cheers,
Martin
_
2011/6/30 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> Yes and no. It's true that we use underscores simply because we
> substitute spaces with underscores. But there's actually a precedent
> for substituting an underscore for a hyphen and this is the tag for
> specifying power sub-stations (created back in 2007):
> ht
2011/6/30 Paul Johnson :
> The rope barrier pictured is actually a crash fence commonly used as a
> cost saving measure on motorway medians in the US.
thank you for this comment Paul. I overlooked this and will change it
the next days. I guess the thing on the pic is a kind of guard_rail
(probabl
2011/7/1 Nathan Edgars II :
>> thank you for this comment Paul. I overlooked this and will change it
>> the next days. I guess the thing on the pic is a kind of guard_rail
>> (probably could be subtagged). I didn't put this picture in myself and
>> it is not showing what I had in mind when suggesti
2011/7/1 Paul Johnson :
> On 06/30/2011 05:35 PM, Stephen Hope wrote:
>> How about lane dividers? This is an example below, though where I'm
>> thinking of them they actually divide a couple of lanes for about a km
>> or so - no lane changing allowed at that point.
>> http://www.ingalcivil.com.au/
2011/7/2 Gary Gallagher :
> I like the proposal. I'm always coming across barriers I can't adequately
> tag. The section that also caught my eye was the bit near the end about
> subtags like barrier:key=yes/no/number. I've been trying to tag in useful
> ways for the blind and was wondering whether
2011/7/3 Stephen Hope :
> Maybe these are better examples of what I meant, though I have seen
> the others in use in the same role.
>
> http://www.zjeastsea.com/en/lane-divider.html
> http://www.roadstud.com.cn/road-studs/61.html
>
> I wouldn't call them bollards - bollard implies to me something t
2011/7/1 Brad Neuhauser :
> just an FYI, one hyphenated tag still on the wiki & in use is
> amenity=parking, parking=multi-storey
There is many more of them. I propose to use
service=drive-through
to follow our standard recommendations (BE, no abbrevs, underscores
instead of spaces, hyphens where
2011/7/4 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Anthony wrote:
>> Besides, the fact that someone made a mistake back in 2007 is not a
>> good reason to make a similar mistake today. There's no good reason
>> to replace hyphens with underscores.
>
> There are plenty of good reason
2011/7/4 fly :
> Am 04.07.2011 13:03, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
>> 2011/7/2 Gary Gallagher :
>>> I like the proposal. I'm always coming across barriers I can't adequately
>>> tag. The section that also caught my eye was the bit near the end about
>>>
2011/7/4 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> 81 instances of denomination=latter_day_saints
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/denomination=latter_day_saints
see below
> 331 instances of denomination=seventh_day_adventist
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/denomination=seventh_day_adventist
> 1 in
btw.: I adjusted the wiki page so that it reflects the original tag
and the potlatch preset (JOSM has no preset for this) as well as the
English spelling.
btw2: The problem is present with drive-in as well.
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Taggi
2011/7/4 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> I prefer to convert hyphens to underscores so why would I "correct" this?
and what do you suggest to convert underscores to?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.
2011/7/4 Pieren :
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 3:51 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
> I'm using "barrier=door" from time to time when a private service street is
> closed by a door (not a gate) or a named path or footway, again when it is
> closed physically by a door (
2011/7/4 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> Your point actually gives us a reason to use underscores instead of
> hyphens. If many people can't remember that two words are correctly
> hyphenated ("without doing research that a hyphen was correct in the
> first place"), why should we force "correct" hyphens wh
2011/7/4 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> I'm not advocating for wrong spelling, but I don't think hyphenation
> is part of spelling, but of grammar/syntax. Wikipedia says that
> "spelling is the writing of one or more words with letters and
> diacritics" and hyphens are neither letters nor diacritics but i
2011/7/4 SomeoneElse :
> On 04/07/2011 17:14, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
>>
>> OK, I think we have provided ample arguments for both sides. Only
>> three of us have debated this point in the last few hours and I'd
>> really like to hear other people's thoughts on this so that we can
>> gauge if the
Hi Eugene,
thank you!
cheers,
Martin
2011/7/5 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:59 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> Eugene, I ask you to revert the automated edits you have done in the
>> past days concerning drive-throughs, e.g.
>> http://www.ope
2011/7/6 Eugene Alvin Villar :
>> well, wikipedia also says that hyphens are sometimes used as diacritics:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diacritic
>>
>> ;-)
>
> [off-list]
>
> Well, I'd certainly like to see you try and convince people that the
> hyphen in "drive-through" is actually a diacritic
2011/7/6 Pieren :
> http://maps.google.ch/maps?q=paris,+Passage+de+la+Boule+Blanche&hl=fr&ll=48.85134,2.37229&spn=0.001273,0.001982&sll=48.853082,2.370364&sspn=0.002545,0.003964&t=k&z=19&layer=c&cbll=48.851346,2.37229&panoid=M3k9nxcYnp2fn3fpfeP39Q&cbp=12,33.63,,0,-2.44
>
> The "Passage de la Boule
2011/7/7 Pieren :
> And this case, Cour Delepine entrance, Paris:
> http://maps.google.ch/maps?q=paris,+Cour+Delepine&hl=fr&ll=48.853267,2.376236&spn=0.001272,0.001982&sll=48.853393,2.376266&sspn=0.002527,0.003964&t=k&z=19&layer=c&cbll=48.853272,2.376236&panoid=QaPsmt8GresisBm_udoo9w&cbp=12,4.87,,0
2011/7/11 Sam Vekemans
> Idea's thoughts?
>
> I'll be working on this today/tomorrow and work out the layout of one of
> the islands, then the rest will follow the same structures
>
png_url = ttp://too.where.it.is/features/pois/food_pub.n.24.png
maybe you can find another key-structure for icon
2011/7/11 Sam Vekemans
> definition = A public house, informally known as a pub, is a drinking
>> establishment which is part of British,[1][2] Irish,[3] Australian,[4] and
>> New Zealand culture.
>> where does this come from? The wiki reads: "An establishment that sells
>> alcoholic drinks that
2011/7/11 Steve Doerr :
>> Thanks - I was wondering what "visor=hedge" meant!
> I wonder if screen=hedge would be what they're looking for?
+1
yes, in the mentioned discussion on talk-de it was clarified that
"visor" is not suitable for these elements. The mapper told us that he
found this word
2011/7/11 Zsolt Bertalan :
> My english, tagging and motorway mapping skills are not good enough, but I
> want to learn, that's why I ask you the following questions:
> - Is beam_barrier a useful addition to this proposal?
I think that a beam_barrier is the same thing as a guard_rail but
please c
2011/7/15 Zsolt Bertalan :
> No, I see it as a tourism feature. I don't want to introduce a new
> namespace. The other tag (hiking_checkpoint=yes) is only needed in the rare
> case if we already have a tourism tag.
I agree to the others: don't propose 2 tags for the same thing. As you
say, stampi
2011/7/20 Jason Cunningham :
> To
> keep things simple the convention is, where possible, to stick with
> british_english for tags.
+1, BE is the general convention for tags in OSM.
> Wikipedia has a use for some people, but openstreetmap is not part of
> wikipedia.The english pages are also do
1 - 100 of 969 matches
Mail list logo
