2011/7/4 SomeoneElse <li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk>: > On 04/07/2011 17:14, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: >> >> OK, I think we have provided ample arguments for both sides. Only >> three of us have debated this point in the last few hours and I'd >> really like to hear other people's thoughts on this so that we can >> gauge if there's a consensus for whatever. > > Whatever (if any) concensus is reached here, any discussion needs to include > the authors of editor presets, and data users need to be informed before any > data is changed. > > So far you've changed a bunch of data so that it (a) doesn't match > Potlatch's editor presets, (b) doesn't highlight when viewed as in > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/87773605 and (c) won't appear in > some maps created from that data because you hadn't said that you were going > to make the change.
Eugene, I ask you to revert the automated edits you have done in the past days concerning drive-throughs, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/seav/edits?page=3 You obviously did not follow the http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits/Code_of_Conduct which would be discuss _before_ you perform the edit. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
