2011/7/15 Zsolt Bertalan <herrber...@gmail.com>: > No, I see it as a tourism feature. I don't want to introduce a new > namespace. The other tag (hiking_checkpoint=yes) is only needed in the rare > case if we already have a tourism tag.
I agree to the others: don't propose 2 tags for the same thing. As you say, stamping points (or hiking checkpoints) will usually / often be related to touristic features. This is IMHO the reason why "tourism" is not suitable as a key for them: they will already be represented by a feature with a tourism key (e.g. attraction). cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
