Re: [Tagging] Designated spots for dogs to wait

TagInfo actually shows 29 counts of amenity=dog_parking. I’ve only seen designated spots for dogs. Leaving a cat there might not be safe for either animal. Ant > 20 авг. 2019 г., в 16:15, Jmapb via Tagging > написал(а): > >> On 8/20/2019 4:57 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote: >> On 20/8/19 6:24 pm

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_calming=dynamic_bump

Thanks for the proposal, this is something I haven’t heard of before! Not sure if “bump” would be suitable for those that slide down beneath the surface? Maybe traffic_calming=dynamic/variable? Regards Ant > 28 авг. 2019 г., в 21:54, "simson.gert...@gmail.com" > написал(а): > > Hello, > > so

Re: [Tagging] Road blocks?

Seeing the tag for the first time, but it's on the wiki so some router should support it. I usually drop a simple barrier=block on the way, with a fixme and check_date for an approximate works end date. Keep in mind that quite a lot of end user apps like mapsme and osmand only update data once

Re: [Tagging] Road blocks?

help pedestrian routing. Indeed merry Christmas to those celebrating. Ant > 25 дек. 2018 г., в 2:03, Graeme Fitzpatrick : > > > Thanks fellas! > >> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 at 18:33, Anton Klim wrote: >> Seeing the tag for the first time, but it's on the wiki so s

Re: [Tagging] Allotments plot / lot tagging and ref?

I think iD might be rendering refs now, unless I misremember. Using ref seems more logical than coming up with a ref replacement just for allotments. Ant > 7 янв. 2019 г., в 0:37, Joseph Eisenberg > написал(а): > > “One day plots may even be rendered, but I'm not holding my breath.” > > I’m

Re: [Tagging] Changeset tag for issue closing

Considering heated discussions usually follow object tags, I won't expect the same amount of people to argue about change set tags (I sometimes forget they exist). Seems logical, although to me qa processing seems complicated to process/fit in a tag... Ant 07.01.2019, в 22:51, Bryan Housel на

Re: [Tagging] Road blocks?

Yep, looks like it might be a router data issue rather than a router issue. Maybe try OsmAnd Live if you have an android device, or find an alternative osm router that updates faster 12.01.2019, 0:15, Joseph Eisenberg : > Graphhhopper does not update the database instantaneously. I believe you

Re: [Tagging] start_date variants

I believe there was an (failed? Undocumented?) attempt to make building:buildyear a thing, but haven’t seen it used for a while. > 15 февр. 2019 г., в 14:44, Stephan Bösch-Plepelits > написал(а): > >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 03:07:09PM +0100, Tobias Zwick wrote: >> Sounds solid and already u

Re: [Tagging] start_date variants

osed_features/IndoorOSM > > [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q2952 > > >> On 2019-02-16 10:39, Anton Klim wrote: >> I believe there was an (failed? Undocumented?) attempt to make >> building:buildyear a thing, but haven’t seen it used for a while. > _

Re: [Tagging] start_date variants

Like in the thread opening email, where there is an amenity that occupies the whole building, we put amenity tags on the outline. I generally support adding more granularity to start_date, but feel like start_date:* might fit better than *:start_date. Anton Klim > 16 февр. 2019 г., в 21

Re: [Tagging] start_date variants

ppenhoefer wrote: > > sent from a phone > > > On 16. Feb 2019, at 23:49, Anton Klim > wrote: > > Like in the thread opening email, where there is an amenity that occupies the > whole building, we put amenity tags on the outline. > > I agree with Serge here, when

Re: [Tagging] airport check in counters

The check in counters are generally quite numerous, so you’d need a detailed indoor map which I’m yet to see for an airport in osm. The wiki aeroways page mentions the undocumented amenity=check_in and security control. For arrival lounges, I think there were a number of “waiting area” proposal

Re: [Tagging] Avoid using place=locality - find more specific tags instead

Deprecating a tag because it was misused would remove quite a lot of current osm tagging. I also think some of the examples you mention cannot be re-tagged without some proper research that’s not going to happen (do the locals call that place %name% because it was a crosssroads at some point or

Re: [Tagging] Inland customs offices

It seems like there was some cross copying on the wiki. There is another, older key, amenity=customs, which is actually used at border crossings (from what I’ve seen) to denote customs control. I am not sure why the amenity tag was deprecated (it also seems to be used more often than the office

Re: [Tagging] Idea for a new tag: amenity=power_supply

I am surprised this is not something that exists already (or is it?) Wouldn't limit it to caravans though, would be equally useful for those looking to charge electronics or power a tool of some sort. Or is that power_supply? Ant пт, 21 июн. 2019 г. в 15:22, Michael Brandtner via Tagging < taggin

Re: [Tagging] Idea for a new tag: amenity=power_supply

Guess it could be the same as fuel stations/hotels etc with extra amenities: high-level tagging on the whole campsite pitch with a sub tag, or nodes on actual power sockets for more detail. пт, 21 июн. 2019 г. в 15:46, Philip Barnes : > On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 15:33 +0300, Anton Klim wrote: &g

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Lounges

Hey everyone, A prolonged waiting period spend sitting in a lounge gave me an opportunity to send out the draft proposal for lounges, which can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Lounges What is proposed: A distinct amenity

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Lounges

at the tax office, ... > An Airport Lounge is more or less modelled on a first-class train-station > waiting room. > > > >> On 9 June 2018 at 14:02, Anton Klim wrote: >> Hey everyone, >> >> A prolonged waiting period spend sitting in a lounge gave me

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Lounges

t=lounge? Or > public_transport=station + lounge=yes ? Either way you would have the option > of wlan=yes/no, shower=yes/no, etc., though with the latter it's not clear > whether those options apply only within the lounge. > > > > >> On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 11:25

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Lounges

I’m thinking some of the “passive resistance” could be avoided if we expanded/replaced “lounge” with “waiting_room/area”, and shifted tagging to PT (makes sense for the original proposal). I’d argue general tourists can buy into some lounges as well. Anton > 10 июня 2018 г., в 19:15, Johnparis

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Lounges

Thanks everyone for your comments and suggestions. I realised I might have bitten a bit too much with this tag, trying to cover bare-bones waiting area and lounges under one key, At this stage I am not expanding the tag to waiting rooms at offices/institutions, rather focusing on the airport/hote

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Lounges

Indeed, I am myself somewhat opposed to a qualifier for each type of lounge out there in the main key. Hence why I set out with just amenity=lounge, not realising how many conflicting meanings people assign to the word, which is why it probably won't work. In light of this, to avoid ambiguity and c

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Lounges

Thanks Martin. I feel like this is a separate, but generally more wide-ranging proposal considering the scale of facilities it potentially covers. Anton 13.06.2018, в 13:43, Martin Koppenhoefer написал(а): > I have set up 2 new proposals for waiting facilities, waiting room and > waiting are

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Lounges

a bit too close to Martin's proposal). Comments on this are most welcome. Anton 12.06.2018, в 13:51, Paul Allen написал(а): > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Anton Klim wrote: >> >> Hence why I set out with just amenity=lounge, not realising how many >> conflictin

Re: [Tagging] Unresolved notes

Hi Graeme, Are you positive the notes were not there previously? Some of them are fairly old, and should’ve definitely been in the Notes layer of osm.org (which is optional). Notes can sometimes be placed by people thinking it’s a personal note only visible to themselves. They also won’t appear

Re: [Tagging] default access tag for driveways

Is there a reason to add access tags to the way, when you have a barrier node that should already hold these tags (lift gate, bollard)? Seems over complicated. Anton > 30 июля 2018 г., в 9:07, Mateusz Konieczny > написал(а): > > 27. Lipiec 2018 18:07 od joost.schou...@gmail.com: > > You wou

Re: [Tagging] Telephone exchange

Hi, The telecom tagging scheme (on wiki) definitely had a tag for telephone exchanges. For a building without windows, I’d suggest building=service > 16 сент. 2018 г., в 8:48, José G Moya Y. написал(а): > > Hi! > > Path 374362033 ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374362033 ) is a building

Re: [Tagging] Emergency=levee_breach_materials

Do these have anything to identify them, like a ref? 3 words for a key seems like a mouthful to me, maybe emergency=levee_repair/materials. Ant 21.09.2018, в 0:59, John Willis написал(а): > I ran into an interesting thing when mapping my local rivers. > > All of the rivers in my area have le

Re: [Tagging] Area of Firestations / Area of Ambulancestations

I’m not sure I understand why it would be a landuse instead of an amenity tag on the area, or the other way round? Are landuses supposed to be for larger areas? > 21 сент. 2018 г., в 9:58, Colin Smale написал(а): > > What about landuse=ambulance_station on the area? What would the landuse be

Re: [Tagging] Emergency=levee_breach_materials

Why not levee_repair? Good to know they have a name and a list 2018-09-22 9:12 GMT+01:00 John Willis : > > > On Sep 21, 2018, at 4:09 PM, Anton Klim wrote: > > Do these have anything to identify them, like a ref? > > > I found a sign cycling today. > > 奥戸防災ステーション

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign direction tagging..

Missed the point when direction= suddenly became a no go for traffic sign mapping. 28.09.2018, в 3:51, Bryan Housel написал(а): > Hey Tagging List! > > While reviewing a pull request to add Traffic Sign presets to iD, I came > across a tagging issue with how traffic sign directions are tagg

Re: [Tagging] visa offices tags

I believe the initial email was referring to a private-run visa assistance company, like VFS Global? In the absence of a better tag I used office=company, but could see something like office=visa(_services) being suitable. It would need to be different for government agencies that might offer si

Re: [Tagging] visa offices tags

Yep, that's the use case I was describing with VFS, I think people here might be conflating/confusing it with an immigration office, where you'd usually go when you already have a visa. I'm not sure about adding a lower-level company= key, but all for office=visa/visa_services. Ant 06.11.20

Re: [Tagging] Government Archives

I used office=government government=archive for these. Meaning of the office key is a bit wider for government offices, so I don’t really see an issue. On your best practice example, I don’t remember the government value for the building key, not sure we should make that a thing. Amenity=public