Like in the thread opening email, where there is an amenity that occupies the whole building, we put amenity tags on the outline. I generally support adding more granularity to start_date, but feel like start_date:* might fit better than *:start_date.
Anton Klim > 16 февр. 2019 г., в 21:40, Sergio Manzi <s...@smz.it> написал(а): > > Stephan, can you point to any such object in OSM where you find that > ambiguity? > > I have the feeling that we could possibly discover a violation of the "One > feature, one OSM element" principle [1] in there... > > Sergio > > [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element > > >> On 2019-02-16 22:01, Stephan Bösch-Plepelits wrote: >> My suggestion was to use a prefix "building:" if the start_date of the >> building differs from the start_date of the amenity. It is not very common >> though right now, with only 163 uses. Only 9 have both start_date and >> building:start_date. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
