I think those would mostly be historical uses. Considering it’s part of an abandoned proposal, don’t think there would be much new entries. Plus, buildyear implies you can specify a year, instead of a date, like you can for start_date and its possible offshoots.
Ant > 16 февр. 2019 г., в 10:22, Sergio Manzi <s...@smz.it> написал(а): > > Actually building:buildyear is of much more widespread use than > building:start_date: > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=building%3Abuildyear -> 2051 > objects > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=building%3Astart_date -> 163 > objects > that's a 12.6:1 proportion... > > The key is documented in the IndoorOSM proposal [1] and in a wiki page of > which I fail to understand the meaning [2]. > > Sergio > > > > [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/IndoorOSM > > [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q2952 > > >> On 2019-02-16 10:39, Anton Klim wrote: >> I believe there was an (failed? Undocumented?) attempt to make >> building:buildyear a thing, but haven’t seen it used for a while. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
