There've been quite a lot of discussions lately about namespaces and indeed current osm tagging is clunky in that regard. not sure if relations are a good fix though
сб, 16 февр. 2019 г. в 23:07, Sergio Manzi <s...@smz.it>: > Yeah. The "*other*" solution could be to "*namespace everything*", so you > could tag building:whatever_property_key_you_want and > amenity:whatever_property_key_you_want, applied to the very same object. > But we're probably too late for that and apparently many seems to hate this > latter solution. > On 2019-02-16 23:59, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > sent from a phone > > > On 16. Feb 2019, at 23:49, Anton Klim <tohak...@gmail.com> > <tohak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Like in the thread opening email, where there is an amenity that occupies the > whole building, we put amenity tags on the outline. > > I agree with Serge here, when there is a problem where it is not clear to > what the tags refer, it is usually a modeling problem of mixing different > things up in one object, and a better solution than creating more specific > tags by prefixing them, would be to fix the model. It will not end at > start_date ;-) > > Cheers, Martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing > listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
