I typically tagged such crosses as man_made=cross
historic=memorial memorial=cross man_made=cross ?
Jun 11, 2023, 02:27 by annekadis...@web.de:
> A historic=wayside_cross does not mark the spot; it is not left in a
> location where someone is buried or died. It is a way to make sure the
> soul o
On 2023-06-10 20:57, Greg Troxel wrote:
Anne-Karoline Distel writes:
I would say that memorial:cause=traffic_accident would leave the options
open whether the victim intended to die or not.
OK but IMHO traffic_crash is better. 'accident' is an assertion of no
blame, and there are messy issue
Van: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org
Verzonden: zondag 11 juni 2023 01:08
Aan: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Onderwerp: Tagging Digest, Vol 165, Issue 8
Send Tagging mailing list submissions to
tagging@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the
I would think that they are still memorials, if they commemorate an
accident or suicide.
I'm not aware of terribly many use cases for man_made=cross, maybe at
open air church service locations or along stations of the cross.
Food for thought, anyway.
Anne
On 11/06/2023 10:29, Mateusz Konieczny
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10967549672
subject=Sandy or subject=Sandy the dog or subject=pet?
Maybe memorial:animal=dog would be an option.
Anne
On 10/06/2023 23:50, Marc_marc wrote:
Le 10.06.23 à 16:40, Anne-Karoline Distel a écrit :
I would like to be able to differentiate memorial
There is also the slightly derogatory term 'cellotaph' for a memorial of
flowers in cellophane wrapper, with a memorial card. Whilst temporary in
construction, they are often replaced/refreshed annually. In the UK they
are tied to lampposts, fences, walls, etc. at the site of a collision.
On Sun,
The only problem, whatever we decide about the wording, if it includes "road" what do we do about the ones on bridges, where it's not clear whether the person died on the road or in the water?Anne--Sent from my Android phone with WEB.DE Mail. Please excuse my brevity.On 11/06/2023, 11:26 Craig
In Poland many of them are small crosses without any text or description
so it is not entirely obvious why they were placed (though you can guess
quite reliably).
Jun 11, 2023, 14:31 by annekadis...@web.de:
>
> I would think that they are still memorials, if they commemorate an
> accident
just my 2 cents:
in some parts of the world it wouldn't be a cross, but something else (in
most of middle-east, in the non-western countries...)
memorial=roadside_memorial
memorial:type=cross/plaque/stone...
memorial:reason=car_crash/whatever...
Il giorno lun 12 giu 2023 alle ore 08:13 Mateus
