On 23.08.2014 23:52, Tod Fitch wrote:
> When looking into how to render them I have become aware of an alternative
> tagging of waterway=wadi as mentioned at
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dwadi
That page was created in 2013, probably to document existing usage (12000 by
now)
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 02:52:41PM -0700, Tod Fitch wrote:
> So which is the preferred tagging?
>
> If waterway=wadi then I have some OSM editing to do but at least the renderer
> should be easy. If waterway=stream, intermittent=yes then I need to get some
> changes done by the project who's re
On 23 August 2014 22:52, Tod Fitch wrote:
> With at least one renderer that I am looking at, the default database
> creation tool supports waterway=wadi but not intermittent=*.
I'm not sure what you are looking at. The latest version of osm2pgsql
does support intermittent:
https://github.com/gra
On 20.08.2014 10:18, Holger Jeromin wrote:
> Andreas Labres wrote on 20.08.2014 04:10:
>> On 19.08.14 23:17, fly wrote:
>>> but 265-267 is wrong
>
> Read as "tagging 265-267 alone is wrong".
>
>> Disagree. addr:housenumber is the official number given to that building.
>> And if
>> it's "265-267
Thanks Matthijs, i was about to submit a render request for it.
Regards,
Hans
On Aug 24, 2014 2:50 AM, "Matthijs Melissen"
wrote:
> On 23 August 2014 22:52, Tod Fitch wrote:
> > With at least one renderer that I am looking at, the default database
> creation tool supports waterway=wadi but not
Hi Lorenzo,
my personal opinion is for tourism=attraction + attraction=acquarium. My
rationale comes from a potential utilization of the tag and tags
combinations. If I wants to query for all and only acquariums, a query on
"attraction=acquarium" will work. Viceversa, if we rise one step above and
On 18.08.2014 22:36, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> What happens when the same entrance has two housenumbers, each from its own
> street? I'm sure this exists somewhere.
The housenumber belongs on the building or building part, not the
entrance(s). When a building (part) has two equivalent addresses, use
2014-08-24 11:05 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann :
> On 20.08.2014 10:18, Holger Jeromin wrote:
>> Andreas Labres wrote on 20.08.2014 04:10:
>>> On 19.08.14 23:17, fly wrote:
but 265-267 is wrong
>>
>> Read as "tagging 265-267 alone is wrong".
>>
>>> Disagree. addr:housenumber is the official num
On 20.08.2014 13:44, SomeoneElse wrote:
> On 20/08/2014 12:38, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>> Currently only weakest reason to use this tag are described. I propose to
>> add "Typically it is used on ways legally dedicated to specific modes of
>> travel
>> by a law or by the rules of traffic." as desc
2014-08-24 11:24 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann :
> On 18.08.2014 22:36, Janko Mihelić wrote:
>> What happens when the same entrance has two housenumbers, each from its own
>> street? I'm sure this exists somewhere.
>
> The housenumber belongs on the building or building part, not the
> entrance(s).
Hello everyone.
In some countries (Japan, Korea…), people orient themselves in the local
area using the names of road junctions or traffic signals rather then the
names of streets.
I have documented the current tagging practice for simple junctions at the
following new wiki pages:
http://wiki.op
On 18.08.2014 17:10, Pieren wrote:
> I'm afraid that the main problem here is not the use "location" or
> "layer" or "cave" but "highway=path". This tag was created for
> multiple vehicles ways, not exclusive to a transportation like
> footways or cycleways. Currently the wiki tries to reflect this
Am 24.08.2014 12:43, schrieb Friedrich Volkmann:
For me, "designated" means that there's a respective sign, e.g. a cycleway
sign => bicycle=designated.
yes that is the typically (non native-language?) (mis)understanding of
designated - and guided by the phrase "A way _marked_ for a particular
+1 for tourism=attraction + attraction=aquarium
I agree with Fabrizio on the use of the two-tag structure for aquaria.
Cheers
Dave
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Fabrizio Carrai
wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
> my personal opinion is for tourism=attraction + attraction=acquarium. My
> rationale comes
In that case, how should application resolve housenumbers ?
What tagging do you propose to allow it ?
I'm working on the BANO project who aims to create a nationwide address
database, using in part OSM data.
I already have to deal with this kind of addr:housenumber=*
For the moment, 265-269 is tr
On 24/08/2014 11:43, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
For me, "designated" means that there's a respective sign, e.g. a cycleway
sign => bicycle=designated.
For compulsory use, *=official was introduced, but that tag is rather
useless without a relation to the way where access is forbidden.
I'd tend
Hi Christian,
As I've already mentioned, in the other thread we discussed a
disambiguation. I would suggest that if you find only
addr:housenumber=265-269
then you can't really assume any interpolation, and I would argue that
even transforming it to "265" and "269" is going beyond what the dat
I'm not sure that would be right to categorize a feature like this as an
attraction. I see most of the attraction=* are used to tag singular
things like amusement park games. There are many attraction=animal that
is vague but I assume refer to more specific things than a zoo.
What i want represent
On 18 August 2014 16:10, Pieren wrote:
> correct me if I'm wrong but a cave is always
> underground
Not strictly speaking; some are in the sides of (near) vertical cliff
faces or mountain sides, with no horizontal, accessible ground above
them.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewi
I was looking at OsmAndMapCreator as I was trying to address this on my
cellphone first.
A bit over a year ago I used Mapnik, pre-cartoCSS, and vaguely recall that I
had to add some things to get osm2pgsql to support what I needed. One item I
used was intermittent=yes but I can't recall if I ha
On 24.08.2014 13:31, Christian Quest wrote:
> In that case, how should application resolve housenumbers ?
> What tagging do you propose to allow it ?
I wrote down some thoughts here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/Multiple_addresses
...although I do now prefer addr2:* instead
The acquarium, like the zoos, are touristic attraction. See Tripadvisor if
you want to have a "reference". It also make sense to use attraction=animal
instead of attraction=zoo or acquarium. Doing that you continue the
progressive level of definitions. So, in my opinion you could describe the
Acqua
The two-tag solution is definitely better
Volker
On 24 August 2014 12:00, Fabrizio Carrai wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
> my personal opinion is for tourism=attraction + attraction=acquarium. My
> rationale comes from a potential utilization of the tag and tags
> combinations. If I wants to query for a
I don't agree with the tourism=attraction argument.
Isn't a museum a touristic attraction too?
At least as much as an aquarium.
Yet we don't tag it as tourism=attraction + attraction=museum
As long as it is documented on the wiki, it shouldn't be a problem for
people making queries in OSM.
201
> Il giorno 24/ago/2014, alle ore 13:25, Georg Feddern
> ha scritto:
>
> Nevertheless e. g. all highway=residential are _designated_ by law - without
> any signs at all... -
designated for whom / as what? Can you expand what you are referring to here?
cheers,
Martin
___
> Il giorno 24/ago/2014, alle ore 20:11, John Packer
> ha scritto:
>
> I don't agree with the tourism=attraction argument.
+1, tourism=attraction is a poor scheme from the early days, maybe we should
deprecate it all together, either without alternative or in favor of a flag
like attracti
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> > Il giorno 23/ago/2014, alle ore 21:08, Ilpo Järvinen
> > ha scritto:
> >
> > How much of such ways that would be a candidate for maxspeed:practical
>
>
> IMHO this is a highly subjective tag that depends heavily on your
> driving abil
Il giorno 24/ago/2014, alle ore 13:30, Friedrich Volkmann ha
scritto:
>> And now for caving.
>
> When there's a visible trail inside a cave, it's essentially the same as an
> outside trail. Therefore, I support highway=path (or footway) in such a case.
>
> But I disadvise the mapping of non-
Il giorno dom, 24/08/2014 alle 20.29 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer ha
scritto:
>
> > Il giorno 24/ago/2014, alle ore 20:11, John Packer
> > ha scritto:
> >
> > I don't agree with the tourism=attraction argument.
>
>
> +1, tourism=attraction is a poor scheme from the early days, maybe we should
> Il giorno 24/ago/2014, alle ore 12:24, Friedrich Volkmann ha
> scritto:
>
> The housenumber belongs on the building or building part, not the
> entrance(s).
In Germany house numbers belong mostly to the whole site, if necessary numbers
can also be assigned to staircases or individual buil
2014-08-24 20:11 GMT+02:00 John Packer :
> I don't agree with the tourism=attraction argument.
>
> Isn't a museum a touristic attraction too?
> At least as much as an aquarium.
> Yet we don't tag it as tourism=attraction + attraction=museum
>
> As long as it is documented on the wiki, it shouldn't
> Il giorno 24/ago/2014, alle ore 14:03, Dan S ha
> scritto:
>
> On the other hand, if you see an object tagged
>
> addr:housenumber=265-269
> addr:interpolation=odd
>
> then we can be quite confident that the mapper intended you to
> interpret this as "265" and "267" and "269".
Yes, but
> Il giorno 24/ago/2014, alle ore 12:00, Fabrizio Carrai
> ha scritto:
>
> my personal opinion is for tourism=attraction + attraction=acquarium.
Have a Look at current values, this doesn't fit into our system IMHO:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/attraction#values
Cheers,
Martin
__
Just to let you know: there is no letter C in the English word aquarium.
On August 24, 2014 5:00:29 AM CDT, Fabrizio Carrai
wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
> my personal opinion is for tourism=attraction + attraction=acquarium.
> My
> rationale comes from a potential utilization of the tag and tags
> comb
Il giorno dom, 24/08/2014 alle 17.03 -0500, John F. Eldredge ha scritto:
> Just to let you know: there is no letter C in the English word
> aquarium.
>
I've been careful. I always write it wrong too :)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.
2014-08-24 12:00 GMT+02:00 Fabrizio Carrai :
> Hi Lorenzo,
> my personal opinion is for tourism=attraction + attraction=acquarium.
>
I don't like attraction=aquarium, I'd rather have
tourism=attraction+man_made=aquarium.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging
36 matches
Mail list logo
