On 20.08.2014 10:18, Holger Jeromin wrote: > Andreas Labres wrote on 20.08.2014 04:10: >> On 19.08.14 23:17, fly wrote: >>> but 265-267 is wrong > > Read as "tagging 265-267 alone is wrong". > >> Disagree. addr:housenumber is the official number given to that building. >> And if >> it's "265-267", then addr:housenumber=265-267 is the only correct >> implementation >> of this. > > But osm db needs a hint that 266 is missing. That is obvious on the > street (by looking at the right and left building) but not in the data.
The OSM db does not need to know about (the meaning of) housenumbers. Its sole purpose is to store data. In this case, the housenumber is "265-267", literally! This is not a shortcut for "265;266;267". Applications should not attempt to resolve housenumbers that way. -- Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
