Hi Lorenzo, my personal opinion is for tourism=attraction + attraction=acquarium. My rationale comes from a potential utilization of the tag and tags combinations. If I wants to query for all and only acquariums, a query on "attraction=acquarium" will work. Viceversa, if we rise one step above and querying for "tourism=attraction", the acquarium tagged as "tourism=acquarium" would not be reported, that is obviously not correct (the acquarium is a touristic attraction).
Ciao FabC 2014-08-24 3:18 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi <lomastr...@gmail.com>: > I would like to submit a new request to vote for the tag > tourism=aquarium. > > The proposal was first considered approved and then excluded due to lack > of feedback. > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approved_features/Aquarium > > Actually exists a very poor permanent page but it is non connected at any > other but the proposal. I found also a german page > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Daquarium > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Daquarium > > tourism=aquarium is actually used 186 times. It was 187 but someone moved > the one I had put in a simple tourism=attraction and this is why I am here > :) > > Other similar taggings i found: > tourism=attraction + attraction=aquarium. 6 times > tourism=zoo + zoo=aquarium. 3 times > tourism=attraction + aquarium=yes. 1 time > tourism=zoo + aquarium=yes. 1 time > Several aquarium=yes have been used also for pet shops > > > Look forward for comments before updating the proposal page and sending > the request > > > Lorenzo > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- *Fabrizio*
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
