2014-08-24 20:11 GMT+02:00 John Packer <john.pack...@gmail.com>: > I don't agree with the tourism=attraction argument. > > Isn't a museum a touristic attraction too? > At least as much as an aquarium. > Yet we don't tag it as tourism=attraction + attraction=museum > > As long as it is documented on the wiki, it shouldn't be a problem for > people making queries in OSM. >
With [tourism=attraction, attraction=aquarium] it would be instantly supported by anything supporting tourism=attraction. And while documenting it on wiki is absolute minimum it still means that complexity of processing OSM data increases. Probably many people never attempted to create something using OSM data, but it is not as easy as most people think. And I think that cascading styles are a good idea - after all how often somebody cares specifically about aquariums? For example that processing OSM data is more complicated than most people expect see default map style bugtracker - https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
