I created a short wiki article about exit_to:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:exit_to
I did NOT add examples or a detailed tagging instruction for obvious reasons.
I added a link to this discussion and also put an excerpt of it on the
talk page. I did not take all comments completely but i
Hi,
A GPS addicts group has encoded a file of over 1000 30 km/h speed limits.
Their leader has just discovered OSM, ITO Map, etc...
He's promoting security much and would like his data into OSM.
I wrote on talk-be that this was doing it the other way round.
A speed limit has two ends and his POIs
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> I think it is pointless to have operator:money_transfer rather than a
> simple "operator". The tag should refer to the object that is tagged,
> and if it is a money transfer it will refer to that, also when you
> don't prefix it. I di
It's not possible to apply the same JOSM preset to all nodes at one time?
If the case, maybe I can write a short program to do that (in C# language).
Stefano
Il 20/11/2012 10:40, A.Pirard.Papou ha scritto:
I have converted their file to a .osm file.
I can transfer the nodes to another layer an
What you really want to do is apply the speed limits to the OSM ways:
maxspeed=30
source:maxspeed=zone30.
But the source file has nodes.
Is there a way to feed all these nodes into Openstreetbugs automatically
and then ask the Belgian population to fix those 'bugs'/'improvement
requests' in thei
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr is also a nice tool for this type of manual
integration
2012/11/20 Jo
> What you really want to do is apply the speed limits to the OSM ways:
>
> maxspeed=30
> source:maxspeed=zone30.
>
> But the source file has nodes.
>
> Is there a way to feed all these nodes int
Pieren,
... And those are all important things to find.
-Jaakko
On Nov 20, 2012 4:47 AM, "Pieren" wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> > I think it is pointless to have operator:money_transfer rather than a
> > simple "operator". The tag should refer to the
maybe the reference to a template was to this wiki page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction where it
seems to emphasize the 'exit_to' key over 'destination'
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Martin Vonwald wrote:
> I created a short wiki article about exit_to:
> htt
2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel
>
>
> I guess a bank could operate multiple money transfer solutions.
> So, service:money:transfer:**operator:western_union=yes ?
>
> starting to get awkward...
>
What if we put "service:money:transfer=Western_Union"? And whenever you
have that key (service:money:tran
On 20 November 2012 18:05, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> 2012/11/19 Sébastien Pierrel
>>
>>
>> I guess a bank could operate multiple money transfer solutions.
>> So, service:money:transfer:**operator:western_union=yes ?
>>
>> starting to get awkward...
>>
>
> What if we put "service:money:transfer=West
2012/11/20 Sébastien Pierrel
>
> What if the establishment can transfer money via Western union and
> Moneygram?
>
service:money:transfer=Western_Union;Moneygram
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
On 20 November 2012 18:50, Janko Mihelić wrote:
>
>
> 2012/11/20 Sébastien Pierrel
>
>>
>> What if the establishment can transfer money via Western union and
>> Moneygram?
>>
>
> service:money:transfer=Western_Union;Moneygram
>
>
I don't like this kind of combo (reason for starting this thread).
On 19/11/2012 23:19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2012/11/19 Richard Smith:
Although the tag crop has a page if you look at it's proposal page (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Crop ) it seems clear
the idea was abandoned due to lack of support. So it seems strange that the
JOSM supports exit_to. JOSM doesn't support destination.
Following the text by Martin I updated
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction#Destinations.
I indeed think it's a good idear to be clear in the communication of any
(to be) deprecated tag.
Most exit_to's seem to
How should http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:STOP_sign.jpg stop
signs be marked?
As
highway=stop
or
traffic_sign=stop
Or is there another way?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
we talked about this a year or so back, and had near consensus if not a
real consensus. it never got
documented in the wiki, and i thought i'd bring it up here rather than
just charging off and editing the
wiki.
i think we need a separate emergency access category because there exist
places wh
On 11/20/2012 3:43 PM, Johan C wrote:
1. does the tag exit_to=* on a motorway_junction in your opinion have
the same meaning as the tag name=* on that motorway_junction?
No -They are different.
2. if your answer to the first question is no, than what is the difference?
Some motorways in t
I'm mapping them as highway=stop as a node of the way, just before where it
crosses the main road. I would map a traffic_sign=stop as a node next to
the road. But that just makes it harder to work with the data, so I prefer
the first approach.
What I never do anymore is to tag the node of the cros
Is there any distinction for direction of the sign?
LM_1
2012/11/20 Jo :
> I'm mapping them as highway=stop as a node of the way, just before where it
> crosses the main road. I would map a traffic_sign=stop as a node next to the
> road. But that just makes it harder to work with the data, so I pr
Forwarded message by NE2
-- Forwarded message --
From: Nathan Edgars II
Date: 2012/11/20
Subject: Re: [Tagging] exit_to on motorway_junction
To:
Cc: Johan C
On 11/20/2012 3:43 PM, Johan C wrote:
> JOSM supports exit_to. JOSM doesn't support destination.
>
> Following the text
there are quite a few named interchanges in South Carolina, as i recall.
frequently
named after State Troopers who were killed in the line of duty. the name
is not at all
the same as the value of exit_to
richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@open
Am 20/nov/2012 um 08:05 schrieb "David ``Smith''" :
> That varies by city. In Cleveland, this is true. But in Columbus, 200 North
> Third Street and 200 South Third Street are two distinct addresses on the
> very same Third Street.
>
> Still, I think the Karlsruhe Schema is sufficient. I'm
I don't see any reason to deprecate exit_to, it seems to be the simplest
method of mapping a destination sign on a motorway junction or similar
exit. I use exit_to fairly frequently and it has been a documented tag
for a while (although on the motorway junction page rather than it's own
page) a
Am 20/nov/2012 um 10:40 schrieb "A.Pirard.Papou" :
> Well, do you think it would be useful to add those POIs and how?
If they are sign positions I think they are useful. You can tag them with
traffic_sign=maxspeed and maxspeed=30 on the sign position (to infer the
direction).
There is a JOSM
Well Paul, the fundamental question is: where do you store the information
needed for any router, in a node, in a way or in both? In my opinion
destination on a way can work very well, please take a look at this example:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:It's_so_funny
Cheers, Johan
ps no d
Hi Johan,
I don't know about storing information for a router, I'm just speaking
from the perspective of myself as a mapper and saying that to me exit_to
on a junction node seems a simple and established way of recording exit
destination signs, so I don't see why I and other mappers using exit_
On 20.11.2012 23:42, Paul Williams wrote:
> I don't see any reason to deprecate exit_to, it seems to be the simplest
> method of mapping a destination sign on a motorway junction or similar
> exit.
Isn't adding a destination tag to the outgoing highway fork just as simple?
When you have two tags
On Nov 20, 2012 4:41 PM, "LM_1" wrote:
>
> Is there any distinction for direction of the sign?
> LM_1
It's understood that the sign faces traffic approaching an intersection.
If a node with highway=stop is on a way but nowhere near an intersection,
or roughly halfway between two intersections, it
On Nov 20, 2012 5:42 PM, "Martin Koppenhöfer"
wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 20/nov/2012 um 08:05 schrieb "David ``Smith''" :
>
>> That varies by city. In Cleveland, this is true. But in Columbus, 200
North Third Street and 200 South Third Street are two distinct addresses on
the very same Third Street.
>>
>
Thanks for all the constructive, if skeptical responses. I can't respond to
each of them individually, but I'll try to respond to the most pointed
comments here.
Bill R Washburn (dygituljunky) asked:
>> "Would you be opposed to just splitting off the directional prefixes and
suffixes, thereby leav
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012, David ``Smith'' wrote:
> Also, the street name in addresses doesn't always match the name of the
> street. For example, there are houses on Old Walker Road which retain
> Walker Rd addresses. And the name Lilly Chapel Opossum Run Road is so
> long, the local post o
Can we start using relations for this already? Really seems like that
provides the specifics we want for this.
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012, Jo wrote:
> I'm mapping them as highway=stop as a node of the way, just before where
> it crosses the main road. I would map a traffic_sign=stop as a node
Using only exit_to there is no way to handle junction topologies other
than a straightforward highway exit, where there is one "big" through road
and one "small" road leaving. What about wrong-side exits? Or where the
highway splits into two (or more) roads of equal importance?
Destination tagging
33 matches
Mail list logo
