Re: [Tagging] Tagging for Pipe Line Reserves

r the pipe line. The discussion on talk_au was that it could be tagged leisure=park park=pipeline_reserve. Cheers Ross On 08/02/17 22:02, Dave Swarthout wrote: Thanks Ross, It *might *be a park but we can't be sure. The mapper only says source=Bing. For all we know he's m

Re: [Tagging] Tagging for Pipe Line Reserves

This is the aerial imagery of the area the original poster is talking about: https://binged.it/2kN1tfC To all intents it could be a park. In osm it's at: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370388062#map=17/-38.15997/145.20073 Cheers Ross On 08/02/17 19:51, Dave Swarthout wrote: Yes,

Re: [Tagging] housenumber on node and area

Hi Mike, Here's the entrance https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-15.91204/135.52593 There's nothing mapped there but if you look at bing imagery you can see where the access is. Here's the approximate centroid https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-15.5677/135.7972 Chee

Re: [Tagging] housenumber on node and area

ped. Not on the property or building. Cheers Ross On 27/05/15 16:18, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Am 27.05.2015 um 02:00 schrieb Ross : In Australia the address refers to the property ie the plot of ground that is defined by the cadastral plan. So those plots of ground may be 600 sq m

Re: [Tagging] housenumber on node and area

? By tagging on a node the actual entrances can be marked and it accurately maps what is on the ground. Cheers Ross On 27/05/15 09:32, pmailkeey . wrote: On 27 May 2015 at 00:06, Colin Smale <mailto:colin.sm...@xs4all.nl>> wrote: Mike, you are missing the point... A building

Re: [Tagging] housenumber on node and area

On 21/05/15 20:16, pmailkeey . wrote: On 21 May 2015 at 02:08, Ross <mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com>> wrote: On 21/05/15 09:51, pmailkeey . wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, We know that a

Re: [Tagging] housenumber on node and area

On 21/05/15 20:16, pmailkeey . wrote: On 21 May 2015 at 02:08, Ross <mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com>> wrote: On 21/05/15 09:51, pmailkeey . wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, We know that a

Re: [Tagging] housenumber on node and area

On 21/05/15 09:51, pmailkeey . wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard > wrote: Hi, We know that addr:housenumber =* can be tagged on nodes

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

e wiki and all others are a sub set of this. Cheers Ross On 13/05/15 17:44, Paul Johnson wrote: If I understand what pmailkeey is saying, he's suggesting an expansion of maxspeed into a namespace, so maxspeed:advisory could be a recognizable thing. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:1

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

And read the wiki page on maxspeed: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed " the maximum legalspeed limit <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Speed_limits> " Cheers Ross On 12/05/15 22:36, pmailkeey . wrote: On 12 May 2015 at 12:29, Martin Koppenhoefer &

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

Well if you read the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed that's exactly what maxspeed implies. and maxspeed:hgv etc is also there Cheers Ross On 11/05/15 21:08, pmailkeey . wrote: On 11 May 2015 at 11:40, Paul Johnson <mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org>> wrote

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

ault residential limit in Australia Not sure of the exact wording for the source:maxspeed but it's the general idea. Cheers Ross On 11/05/15 09:41, Andrew MacKinnon wrote: How do you tag speed limits on curves and highway on/off ramps? At least in Ontario, these speed limits are advisory only

Re: [Tagging] RFD Camp ground Kitchens and their fittings

On 31/01/15 18:11, johnw wrote: On Jan 31, 2015, at 4:29 PM, ross wrote: Had thought about this myself as we also tend to look for camps with kitchens. So on a tourism=camp_site or tourism=caravan_site node or way What about on the building that is the kitchen in the camp? (so the

Re: [Tagging] RFD Camp ground Kitchens and their fittings

Had thought about this myself as we also tend to look for camps with kitchens. So on a tourism=camp_site or tourism=caravan_site node or way kitchen=yes kitchen:stove=yes kitchen:bbq=yes kitchen:microvave_oven=yes kitchen:fire_place=yes etc... Cheers Ross On 31/01/15 13:55, Warin wrote: Hi

Re: [Tagging] amenity=kennel

ggest amenity=pet_boarding or amenity=kennel and then dog=yes, cat=yes, etc Cheers Ross ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Turn Restriction usage

point, and at that point a junction brings to a oneway secondary road? The name of the way, the fact that you are turning > 180 degrees on the same way. Cheers Ross ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/

Re: [Tagging] Turn Restriction usage

mention causing a lot of road splitting. Stephen Cheers Ross ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] This needs to be nipped in the bud

ns on this and it's junk mapping. Cheers Ross ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Waterway direction

nother tag being added. I've traced a number of > waterways from aerials and never had any idea I was supposed to set > the direction of the way equal to the direction of flow. motorway,motorway_link In both the direction of the way means something withou another tag being added

Re: [Tagging] How do you map handicapped parking? (and other questions)

the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking -- Cheers Ross ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] is tourism a good category for everything cultural?

nformation easily. Obviously there is no use discussing this with you as you have no understanding of normalising a relational database and only bother to hard code things, like paths in a program. This appears to be going about 60m above your head. -- Cheers Ross >>>>>>>&g

Re: [Tagging] is tourism a good category for everything cultural?

rt to slinging mud. I have a significant idea about how osm works as I have to integrate it into programs I write or contribute to. If the database was normalised then I'd have a reduction of about 1000 lines of code in one program alone. -- Cheers Ross _

Re: [Tagging] is tourism a good category for everything cultural?

You may also want to have a read of this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization -- Cheers Ross ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] is tourism a good category for everything cultural?

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:03:42 +0200 Ulf Lamping wrote: > Am 24.08.2010 09:36, schrieb Ross Scanlon: > >> Well, I will take a change to 'troll' again about it. This discussion > >> comes up again and again because we don't have: > >> a) clear tagging

Re: [Tagging] is tourism a good category for everything cultural?

so taggers don't get confused. > Said all that, I think more work is needed on cleaning up and fixing > map features wiki entries. There are lot of bugs and errors. +1 -- Cheers Ross ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] is tourism a good category for everything cultural?

eople agree with them, and the > only major disagreement is “it goes against the status quo”? Or the only disagreement is that "it will break the renderers"? Cheers Ross ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] turn restrictions, multiple time intervals

erted to indicate the hours you can turn, rather > than the hours you can't? And also a semi-colon ; between the times as per the rest of multiple values for one key. As well as 4 digit times? eg. hours=09:00-15:00;19:00-06:00 -- Cheers Ross __

Re: [Tagging] turn restrictions, multiple time intervals

one time interval. > > Michael. Maybe: hour_on=06:00;15:00 hour_off=09:00;18:00 -- Cheers Ross ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] emergency=*

th 'a lot of time' and move on... Sounds sensible to me, I'm busy tracing new nearmap imagery. -- Cheers Ross ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] emergency=*

> I just don't see an ambulance/fire station as an emergency. I mean, if > you fall down and injure yourself you don't try & get to the station you > 'phone up & get an ambulance to come to you. The suggestion is to have fire, police and ambulance

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] emergency=*

On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:05:19 +0100 Emilie Laffray wrote: > On 30 July 2010 16:26, Ross Scanlon wrote: > > > > > Total time 6 minutes > > > > Hundreds of hours, yeah right. > > > > The program I've been talking about uses osm2pgsql and mapnik so I&

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] emergency=*

) as points &datasource-settings; And now the osm.xml file (30 seconds) [amenity] = 'police' &maxscale_zoom17; [amenity] = 'fire_station' &maxscale_

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] emergency=*

code to do this is approximately 100 lines of c including white space and comments. -- Cheers Ross ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] emergency=*

on and fire_station as these are both emergency services. However not the hospital as not all hospitals are emergency hospitals. If the hospitals have an emergency ward then tag the hospital with emergency=yes. -- Cheers Ross __

Re: [Tagging] emergency=*

> On 29 July 2010 19:15, Ross Scanlon wrote: > > Just need to make sure that a date is set to remove the "old" amenity tags. > > What would a reasonable time frame be? > > ___ > Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] emergency=*

> Actually we could do both, we could add emergency=* tags to existing > POIs without any problems as far as I know, and in future remove the > old amenity tag. I think this is a better option. Just need to make sure that a date is set to remove the "old" amenity tag

Re: [Tagging] emergency=*

m > being able to implement anything like that at present. > > Steve Wouldn't it be better for these to be emergency=* as that's what I'd be looking for no matter what country I was in. -- Cheers Ross ___ Tagging ma

Re: [Tagging] Tagging U-Turns (Was: [OSM-talk] Divided/Non-Divided Intersection)

> Should we be tagging where it's allowed or where it's not allowed or > where it's signed specifically one way or the other? Only where it's signed. -- Cheers Ross ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http