Yes, I see now you're asking about the land that the pipeline
either runs over or through.
I would avoid the term reserve, however. I generally think of a
reserve as a larger area, often a park or historic area, e.g.,
the Gabo Island Lighthouse Reserve in Canada or the Hinchinbrook
Lighthouse Reserve, which is a Park in Valdez-Cordova County,
Alaska. There is also this reserve which is related to your
illustration; the huge area known as the National Petroleum
Reserve in Alaska, but I would not want it to be confused with
your tagging targets.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Petroleum_Reserve%E2%80%93Alaska
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Petroleum_Reserve%E2%80%93Alaska>
Maybe landuse=pipeline would be a good pick?
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 08-Feb-17 06:51 PM, François Lacombe wrote:
Hi Warin,
Do you have pictures of such areas plz ?
I don't see anything corresponding to 'reserve'
All the best
Not personally ... and it is a fair way away. As I say ..
reported on the Australian group.
I assume there is a sign locally to advise on the 'pipeline
reserve'.
Gas pipe lines cover fair distances in Australia ..
One line is 1,300 km here
https://www.apa.com.au/our-services/gas-transmission/east-coast-grid/moomba-sydney-pipeline/
<https://www.apa.com.au/our-services/gas-transmission/east-coast-grid/moomba-sydney-pipeline/>
The reserve might be up to 25 meters wide from
https://www.seagas.com.au/safety/
<https://www.seagas.com.au/safety/>
Photo of their warning sign
http://www.seagas.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/danger.jpg
<http://www.seagas.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/danger.jpg>
I have seen similar signs for gas and fibre optic lines in my
wanderings, some warning of a restriction in use of area
above the line - thus advising of a restrictive reserve.
There will be local storm water, potable water lines too.
Long distant buried communication lines too, a number over
8,500 km. At least some of these will have 'reserves' evident
on the surface.
Le 8 févr. 2017 08:24, "Warin" <61sundow...@gmail.com
<mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
That tags the pipe line itself.
The request is to tag the area set aside for a pipe line
... a reserve.
On 08-Feb-17 04:38 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
There is already a tagging structure for pipelines that
takes into account whether it's underground or
overground. See
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8964252
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8964252>
for a section of the Trans Alaska Pipeline. However,
the land area above the pipeline, which is restricted
for casual access throughout Alaska, has no special
tagging.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Warin
<61sundow...@gmail.com <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
A question came up on the Australian list that
would be more appropriate here.
"My local area (and I'm sure many others) have lots
of pipeline reserves.
I'm really not sure how to tag these. They appear
to have
public access for walking at least. (One local one
has a sign
disallowing golf...) Some others appear to be
across private
land, and i'm less interested in those, I'd really
like to
show those ones with public access.
examples:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370388062#map=17/-38.15997/145.20073
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370388062#map=17/-38.15997/145.20073>
I've tagged them as leisure=park previously, and paths
evident on the ground have just been
tagged highway=path.
Any ideas?"
My comments:
I note the pipeline is not visible ... I assume
underground and the
location is not evident so you cannot map the pipe
line itself.
As it is a landuse ... ?
I would tag landuse=pipeline
However ... some pipe lines cross farms,
residential areas ... these have legal easements
through the associated properties.
And these would be already tagged with a landuse.
Humm power lines are mapped ... should there be
similar provision for other infrastructure?
Perhaps a 'infrastructure' tag that can be used for
all?
infrastructure=pipeline
infrastructure=sewer
infrastructure=water
infrastructure=phone
Note it should be used for the area that is
affected by/reserved for the infrastructure, not
just the infrastructure itself?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
<mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
--
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
<mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
_______________________________________________ Tagging
mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org
<mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
_______________________________________________ Tagging
mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org
<mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
--
Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at
http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>