On 21/05/15 09:51, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com
<mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
We know that addr:housenumber
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr>=* can be tagged on
nodes
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#How_to_map_addresses> and
that it's very convenient.
But wrong.
Why? It's all very well that this may be you opinion but the wiki and
accepted practice says otherwise.
A problem in tagging the number on a node *instead* of on an area
is that someone making a nice copy (& paste) like below (partim)
of the nice information found in the left pane of OSM.org will
inadvertently miss the number.
Does anyone have an objection against the same number being *also*
on the node?
That is the same number both on a node (once) and on the
way/relation *that this node belongs to* (once)?
(we already have the other address information routinely
duplicated and even triplicated (associatedAddress) for the sake
of consumers finding it, so why not the address?)
Info shouldn't be duplicated or triplicated either.
Agree.
--
Mike.
@millomweb
<https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all
your info on Millom and South Copeland
via *the area's premier website - *
*
*
*currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family,
property & pets*
*
*
T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
