>
>>
>> على ٢٦/٩/٢٠١٩ ١:٣٦ م، كتب James:
>> > If you have a bus route that doubles back on itself, do you have to
>> > add the way twice to the relation or add it once and let the router
>> > figure out that it's already in the relation?
>>
>
If you have a bus route that doubles back on itself, do you have to add the
way twice to the relation or add it once and let the router figure out that
it's already in the relation?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstre
p 20, 2019, 12:13 James wrote:
>
>> For bus routes I understand the whole concept of route and route_master
>> and you map multiple routes into route_master if there is a fork in the
>> route.
>>
>> My question is say the bus schedule at one specific time of day(schoo
For bus routes I understand the whole concept of route and route_master and
you map multiple routes into route_master if there is a fork in the route.
My question is say the bus schedule at one specific time of day(school
morning) has one stop it uses only once a day, but does not deviate from
sai
bus route relations can get very complexe if they are not ordered. I order
them to make sure I haven't missed anything
On Thu, May 3, 2018, 11:28 AM Yves, wrote:
> Un-ordered route members make it very hard to detect a broken route.
> Best practice :
> 1. If you edit a route, order it at best an
@Peter, Same here in Canada. No one calls a substation a kiosk here
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 6:16 AM Peter Elderson, wrote:
> Looks like it's australian, to call a power substation a power kiosk. It
> converts the high voltage to low voltage and distributes power to
> households. Just 'kiosk' is co
Martin that reminds me of what someone did in Northern Canada:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/107355436#map=14/68.7653/-81.2156
Inuktitut and English, despite Inuktitut not really being used(it's a way
to write what they speak invented by European settlers/priests), problem is
it's only for In
on top of that documentation is not clear atleast when I was trying to
learn how to tag bus routes. The only way I understood was a google hangout
video on youtube(OSM US?) showing how they tagged it.
Add relations and direction of ways (forwards, backwards) and it's a very
time consuming task to
i see craft=* as * skill set or prefession services are offered here.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 3:17 PM Martin Koppenhoefer,
wrote:
>
>
> 2018-03-18 11:22 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale :
>
>> So if we tag a building "craft=tailoring" then that says "tailoring
>> occurs in this building" or possibly "tailori
m the title of the issue, I assume that craft wasn’t being rendered
> before? Which might very well explain why everyone used shop to tag it…
>
>
>
> *From:* James
> *Sent:* Sunday, 18 March 2018 12:19
> *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <
> tagging@openstre
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3126#issuecomment-373963431
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=shop%3Dtailor
10 000 uses
vs
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/craft=tailor#overview
5000
Should we support both or just one(if so which?)
___
well shop=cannabis is going to be needed in Canada in a couple months as
it's going to become legal nation wide with goverment run shops July 1st.
The preposal looks good
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018, 8:22 PM Michael Patrick, wrote:
> Here, Cliff :-)
> ( from https://lcb.wa.gov/records/frequently-reque
it is indeed an upstaires. 40 and 40a are the units downstaires. No 40a ½
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018, 5:48 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick,
wrote:
> On 13 March 2018 at 21:22, James wrote:
>
>> in case it wasnt bad enough, there's 40A to the right of it:
>>
>
> From looking at the
/www.google.ca/maps/search/40%C2%BD+Rue+de+Carillon,+Gatineau,+QC+J8X+2N7,+Canada/@45.4284038,-75.7238724,19z/data=!3m1!4b1
>
> So for the other project, we had to strip out the numerical modifiers (½,
> bis ...) before trying to geocode. We could have tried to interpolate but
> that would have
C2%BD#values It's used very
>> few times (~200) and many are by the same user, which seems like more
>> argument against using UTF-8.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:17 AM, James wrote:
>>
>>> so far the fractions I've seen are ½ and ¾ and ¼. On ph
for you? Or 8/8? Does unicode even have 8/8? I haven't
> been able to find a decisive answer.
> -- Původní e-mail --
> Od: James
> Komu: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <
> tagging@openstreetmap.org>
> Datum: 12. 3. 2018 16:46:40
> Předmět: [T
https://i.imgur.com/eigT5hX_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium
How should this be tagged in housenumber? Using unicode ( ½ ) or ASCII( 1/2
)?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Well, here's an example of how I dealt with US-19 Truck over here in Pittsburgh
were it isn't signed on I-279 or I-376 except inside of the I-376 exit 69 mess
on the south side of the Fort Pitt Tunnels.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/571349 (signed)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relati
and would be valid. It's allowing the router to know that a new lane is being
added when combined with the next way (
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419799886 ) which has the "lanes:forward=2"
tag. It also allows the routers to properly tell people to get in the left
lane i
I honestly think Mapbox needs to stop immediately editing ways that they think
are invalid. I've seen several ways that I've work hard on, know are valid,
and are being damaged by edits. The 'NONE' tag in turn lanes is COMPLETELY
VALID
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rickmastfan67/diar
Apologies but I've never come across the term mole, the equivalent
English article on the Wikipedia for the German article Mole and the
French article Brise-lames is the article Breakwater which has a tag
page on the openstreetmap wiki[1] is a approved proposal and seems to
have almost 14000 ways,
t to acknowledge that he at least looked or
would take a look at the wiki page on this tag. So, I don't know if he fully
read the wiki page or not.
Any help/opinions on this subject would be greatly appreciated.
-James
_
where
these signs are posted so they can continue to alert drivers who go over the
ramp speed (if that option is turned on).
-James
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
th Side of Pittsburgh that
still has the old streetcar tracks from when that line was decommissioned in
the 1980's still embedded in it, and is a brick road to boot. I don't think we
have any other examples like that, but I haven't tried to do any research on
all the old streetc
y traffic going the way you need to go. I know some states frown on doing
that, but most understand that needs to be done sometimes.
And another note here, I don't think you should really be attacking people here
on-list when they can't defend themselves, Paul. It just isn't righ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:centre_turn_lane
?
This is what I've been using.
-James
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 18:11:11 -0500
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Center Turn Lane Tagging?
lanes:both_ways=1turn:lanes:both_ways=left
O
But what if the pole has both telephone and power on it? ;) That's what's
common here in my neighborhood. I can look out my front door and see a pole
with both of them using it.
-James
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:05:38 +0200
From: francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu
T
now to mention which
direction the traffic lights effect ( [1] & [2] ). And here's a quick
StreetView link (since I don't have a personal picture going outbound) showing
how it's setup so you can see what I'm talking about ( [3] ). In both of those
cases, the "fr
Why wouldn't something like a node tagged "highway:forward=give_way" work?
-James ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
nobody
> really commented about here on the Tagging list or on the Wiki page for
> it.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/motorway_junction_Extension
> --James ___
Tagging maili
affic lights are only for the outbound traffic (going out of Downtown
> Pittsburgh). They are the only known examples I can think of in this area
> that doesn't have a divider separating the traffic.
-James [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/684666723[2]
http://www.opens
___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I could revive that if everybody thought it was a good idea since I came up
with it. --James
a
> good example to use. Anyway, shouldn't it be reg_ref (Regional
> reference) instead? Or a relation?
>
In fact, the tag "unsigned_ref" is used more often. But most of those tags are
from NE2. However, it's used a
to do what
one simple "restriction=no_*" tag could do for the one direction that the sign
says you can't go. -James (Here's the link to the page again if you want quick
access to it: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction )
p.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
-James ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I would love to see a bot run after the database officially was declared odbl
to delete them and the odbl:note tags. ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
motorway 'rules' apply on the slip
> road.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Andrew
>
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
This is what I do as well. I consider them as "motorway_link's&q
Eugene, you should also mark your ticket on the trac as invalid (or something
else) because of this.http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3873 Don't want them
to make a change to the rendering by accident. ;) -- James
> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:13:40 +0800
> From: sea...@gmail.com
&g
should do one "final" vote on this on the Wiki
talk page so we will not need to have a discussion about this ever again. :)
-- James
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
All I know is that "service=drive-through" was rendered already in Mapnik while
"service=drive_through" is not. Look here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.525952&lon=-80.006203&zoom=18&layers=M I
had originally tagged the "Drive Thru's" for Taco Bell and Arby's here as
"service=drive-thro
opinions before I tagged some of US-19 in WV that has some
low (~14'-8") overpasses that cross over it in Oak Hill that I noticed on a
recent trip.
So, if there is a general consensus on which way to tag it, I'll also update
the wiki to put in an example to *help
y_junctions). Completely different from the
"relation:destination_sign" which works with at-grade intersections (or also
for signs that mention extra info like brown or smaller green signs here [like
this: http://goo.gl/maps/220D - #5C now #69C (I-376) and #7A now #1B] in the
USA).
I h
main motorway when both are tagged as motorways (instead
of motorway and motorway_link).
You can see the proposal here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/motorway_junction_Extension
-- James (rickmast
Well, I'm working up an official proposal for this right now. Will updating
this thread and also send out a RFC once it's done. ;)
-- James
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetma
the HOV lanes when they are open. Motorcycles are except of the HOV
restrictions when they are active, so how would you suggest I tweak the
relations to show this properly?
Thanks.
- James
From: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:41:35
"?).
I'm mainly putting this out there before I start up a proposal to deal with
exits like this where we could then work with the renders and map data users to
work up a scheme that would work for ever
I was just about to create some new relations for the I-279/I-579 HOV lanes to
reflect the times that they are open and closed.
http://www.dot.state.pa.us/penndot/districts/district11.nsf/traffic_HOV_hours?OpenForm
That shows the current times when they are open and when Outbound is restricte
penstreetmap.org
From: ba...@ursamundi.org
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:11:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Traffic Lights, but only for one direction on a highway
that isn't divided
On 04/13/2011 12:45 AM, James Mast wrote:
> So does anybody have any suggestions on how to deal with something like
> highway that isn't divided
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> CC: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
>
> On 13 April 2011 17:06, James Mast wrote:
> > Not the same situation here NE2. There are no traffic lights at
> > all installed in either place for the inbound direction
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Traffic Lights, but only for one direction on a
> highway that isn't divided
>
> On 4/13/2011 1:45 AM, James Mast wrote:
> > So does anybody have any suggestions on how to deal with something like
> > this? Here's my example:
> >
>
So does anybody have any suggestions on how to deal with something like this?
Here's my example:
Here in Pittsburgh, when you're coming off I-579 going towards the South Hills
across the Liberty Bridge, you encounter two sets of traffic lights (one before
you get onto the bridge, and one on
I've personally heard "Contraflow" mentioned for the switchover's some DOT's
have on Interstates for Hurricane (or other) evacuations in the press. I know
I-95 in Georgia happens to have two such crossovers, but they don't
specifically say "contraflow" on the signs. Here are links to how they
; From: nerou...@gmail.com
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Counterflow Lanes
>
> On 2/18/2011 5:00 AM, James Mast wrote:
> > Alright, I've tagged the roadway that I was asking this about with the
> > following:
> > lanes=3
> > lane
Alright, I've tagged the roadway that I was asking this about with the
following:
lanes=3
lanes:counterflow=center
That should work "for now".
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/24873632
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
h
a.org/wiki/Lions_Gate_Bridge) where the center lane changes
direction to favor the traffic flow at specific times during the day?
"oneway=reversible" doesn't really work in this case unless we ever have a lane
proposal that&#
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:06:48 -0500
> From: nerou...@gmail.com
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency Traffic Signals
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:33 AM, James Mast
> wrote:
> > I've created a propos
>On 13 January 2011 16:10, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On 01/12/2011 11:33 PM, James Mast wrote:
>>> I've created a proposal for Emergency Traffic Signals, which are
>>> typically found in front of fire stations and highway tunnels at
>>> http://wiki
I've created a proposal for Emergency Traffic Signals, which are typically
found in front of fire stations and highway tunnels at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Emergency_Traffic_Signals
--
any other websites without asking me first).
Anyways, I still think the "maxweight:combo" might work best for this. I could
at least tag the "normal" limit now and wait for some more consensus on how to
tag the second weight later if I wanted to.
--
only thing since it's not
covered in the 2009 MUTCD, or even the 2003 one.
So, any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
James ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
ode
* a pile of others
[0]
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:type%3Dtraffic_control
--
James
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 17/08/2010, at 2:09 AM, Matthias Meißer wrote:
> Yes soft moderation by the community but therefore the community needs some
> central space and some guidelines. You already see the lack of voters, just
> cause it's to decentral communication atm.
It's also because some people (myself include
that with textual tag. For example "junction=roundabout" could be
tagged with implies="oneway=yes".
--
James
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
ugh imagery (although I haven't used that bit personally).
--
James
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 20/01/2010, at 6:44 PM, Peter Childs wrote:
> Cafe, Bar, Pub etc.
>
> The line is weather it sells Beer, or other Alcoholic Beverages,
As another data point, here's what I define them as in Australia - not
guaranteed to be the same as other .au definitions:
Restaurant - Place to go and get a
On 12/12/2009, at 7:47 AM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:02 PM, James Livingston wrote:
>>
>> The current solution I've seen near Brisbane is "do whatever you prefer",
>> which is why several paths flip back and forwards between footway and
On 11/12/2009, at 5:44 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> The current wiki definition of highway=cycleway is "mainly or
> exclusively for bicycles". This I cannot be sure of from the aerial
> imagery, nor can I of anything to do with the law. What to do...
Ah, the curse of NearMap being too good.
The curre
On 09/12/2009, at 3:30 AM, Mike Harris wrote:
> Personally - and I'm probably wrong! - I had always thought that foot /
> bicycle = yes / no etc. did not say anything one way or the other about
> formal legal status (hence leaving this to designation= ) but merely whether
> the evidence on the
On 06/12/2009, at 5:17 PM, John Smith wrote:
> 2009/12/6 James Livingston :
>> I'd hope that bicycle=no would have the same implications for having a
>> bicycle without riding it as other *=no tags would for their transports. For
>> example I would guess that where h
On 05/12/2009, at 4:14 AM, Anthony wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Matthias Julius wrote:
> I guess it is implied that when you are not allowed to carry a bike
> you are not allowed to ride it neither.
>
> True, but when I tag bicycle=no, I don't intend to imply anything about
> wheth
On 03/12/2009, at 8:06 PM, Richard Mann wrote:
> On public land you can usually push a bike and be treated as a pedestrian,
> but that's not always the case on private land (eg the University Parks in
> Oxford) - bicycles are banned altogether.
Most of the time when I've seen those signs it has
Hi all,
Because we were having *so* much fun repeating the footway-cycleway-path debate
again, here's another related question: what does bicycle=no actually mean, no
bicycles or no cycling?
Last night I asked on IRC whether anyone know how to tag a "Cyclists must
dismount" sign, and would bic
72 matches
Mail list logo
