https://www.google.ca/maps/place/40+Rue+de+Carillon,+ Gatineau,+QC+J8X+2N7/@45.4286021,-75.7232533,19z/data=! 4m2!3m1!1s0x4cce048bb61faba1:0x6e537799a3a8fb18
Google just removes the ½ and only resolves the 40. Same with bing: https://binged.it/2FAlwVK Same with Here maps: https://wego.here.com/canada/gatineau/street-square/40-rue-de-carillon--loc-dmVyc2lvbj0xO3RpdGxlPTQwK1J1ZStkZStDYXJpbGxvbjtsYW5nPWZyO2xhdD00NS40Mjg1MzkyNzYxMjMwNTtsb249LTc1LjcyMzE5NzkzNzAxMTcyO3N0cmVldD1SdWUrZGUrQ2FyaWxsb247aG91c2U9NDA7Y2l0eT1HYXRpbmVhdTtwb3N0YWxDb2RlPUo4WCsyTjc7Y291bnRyeT1DQU47ZGlzdHJpY3Q9UXVhcnRpZXIrZGUrSHVsbDtzdGF0ZT1RdWViZWM7c3RhdGVDb2RlPVFDO2NvdW50eT1HYXRpbmVhdTtjYXRlZ29yeUlkPWJ1aWxkaW5nO3NvdXJjZVN5c3RlbT1pbnRlcm5hbDtubGF0PTQ1LjQyODUzMTY0NjcyODUxNjtubG9uPS03NS43MjMzNTA1MjQ5MDIzNA?map=45.42838,-75.72271,19,normal&msg=40%20Rue%20de%20Carillon I'm thinking they are not aware of it.... On Mon, Mar 12, 2018, 4:12 PM Michał Brzozowski, <www.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd look how other map providers solved this. > > On a side note, why I've never see such phrase on this list? We'd figure > out many problems by looking how others do things. There's nothing wrong > with it. > > Michał > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:06 PM, Brad Neuhauser <brad.neuhau...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I found it hard to pull out usage of "1/2" through taginfo, but was able >> to search for usage of the UTF-8 version (½): >> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=%C2%BD#values It's used very >> few times (~200) and many are by the same user, which seems like more >> argument against using UTF-8. >> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:17 AM, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> so far the fractions I've seen are ½ and ¾ and ¼. On phones it's very >>> easy to input fraction in unicode(press and hold the numerical value of the >>> numerator: 1 for ½, ¼ or 2 for ⅔), but I agree that dealing with Bom of >>> UTF-8 usually ends up being messed up and is why I'm asking what the norm >>> for OSM is >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018, 12:04 PM Vladimír Slávik, < >>> slavik.vladi...@seznam.cz> wrote: >>> >>>> Technical: Unicode will be hard to manipulate by hand without a table >>>> of characters/symbols to copy from. Subsequent editors or users down the >>>> chain of tools will break it. Most prominently, search may break, because >>>> users will not know how to input 1/2. (Oh look, I just didn't, either...). >>>> >>>> Is it common to have more complicated fractions? Here we append letters >>>> to do the same, and I have seen places where they had to go all the way to >>>> "h" - which would be 1/8 for you? Or 8/8? Does unicode even have 8/8? I >>>> haven't been able to find a decisive answer. >>>> ---------- Původní e-mail ---------- >>>> Od: James <james2...@gmail.com> >>>> Komu: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools < >>>> tagging@openstreetmap.org> >>>> Datum: 12. 3. 2018 16:46:40 >>>> Předmět: [Tagging] Tagging fraction house numbers? >>>> >>>> https://i.imgur.com/eigT5hX_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&; >>>> fidelity=medium >>>> >>>> How should this be tagged in housenumber? Using unicode ( ½ ) or ASCII( >>>> 1/2 )? >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
