On 12/12/2009, at 7:47 AM, Roy Wallace wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:02 PM, James Livingston <doc...@mac.com> wrote: >> >> The current solution I've seen near Brisbane is "do whatever you prefer", >> which is why several paths flip back and forwards between footway and >> cycleway depending on who traced each section :-\ Given that I don't know >> which is appropriate, I haven't felt like retagging my many kilometres of >> inter-connected footways or someone else's many kilometres of >> inter-connected cycleway - especially since they may have had more than just >> the imagery to go on. > > Thanks James. About having "more than just the imagery to go on", > didn't they use source=*?? tisk tisk :P
It had source=nearmap because it was traced from nearmap. I've never seen source:highway=* to indicate how they decided what kind of path it is. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
