Le jeu. 12 janv. 2023 à 23:34, François Lacombe
a écrit :
> It is consistent with UN classification
> https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesm/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf
> See section C, class 3600 which is equivalent to utility=water
>
Typo. Obviously you should read section E, class 3600.
My ey
Hi Volker,
Le jeu. 12 janv. 2023 à 21:27, Volker Schmidt a écrit :
> Drinking water and sewage are really very different stuff, and at present
> already mapped differently. And I guess there are very few plants that
> handle both (water recycling in the International Space Station springs to
> m
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 02:44, Illia Marchenko
wrote:
>
> Maybe *storage_tank=open *or similar.
>
I think this one may be the simplest solution.
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/
sent from a phone
> On 12 Jan 2023, at 19:44, François Lacombe wrote:
>
> man_made=water_works isn't the only possible value, there is
> man_made=pumping_station, man_made=covered_reservoir...
> utility=water is way simpler and cover them all.
If I got it right, utility=water is for all kin
Hi François,
Il giorno gio 12 gen 2023 alle ore 19:44 François Lacombe <
fl.infosrese...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Hi Volker,
>
> Le jeu. 12 janv. 2023 à 12:02, Volker Schmidt a
> écrit :
>
>> The present vs future tagging table is flawed.
>> The landuse column shows values that are rarely used.
Hi Volker,
Le jeu. 12 janv. 2023 à 12:02, Volker Schmidt a écrit :
> The present vs future tagging table is flawed.
> The landuse column shows values that are rarely used. Industrial=water
> (500 uses) in practice is tagged as man_made=water_works (30k+ uses).
> "sewerage" land use exists and is
Le 12.01.23 à 17:02, António Madeira a écrit :
If, for example, we state that it has a roof=no, you're defining a
specific kind of covering, when it has none and you have no way to know
if that would be a roof, a tarp, a shed, etc.
roof=* is indeed maybe too specific.
but closed or not tank an
António Madeira :
> The main issue is not closed water tanks. That can be a default in OSM.
> The issue here is how to inform that a storage_tank is open.
> Mind you that there is an infinitude of storage tanks types, but for
> firefighting, those are almost exclusively made in concrete and are op
The main issue is not closed water tanks. That can be a default in OSM.
The issue here is how to inform that a storage_tank is open.
Mind you that there is an infinitude of storage tanks types, but for
firefighting, those are almost exclusively made in concrete and are open
for the reasons I sta
The present vs future tagging table is flawed.
The landuse column shows values that are rarely used. Industrial=water (500
uses) in practice is tagged as man_made=water_works (30k+ uses). "sewerage"
land use exists and is in practice tagged as man_made=wastewater_plant (75k
uses).
Generally speaki
I would say that storage tanks, as default, are closed. So a
man_made=storage_tank in OSM is closed.
Secondly if a tank is closed (at the top), this is called a roof. There are
fixed roofs and floating roofs.
See as an example this manufacturer's web site:
https://www.wermac.org/equipment/storage_t
Dear all,
The vote is now open on the Utility facilities proposal
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Utility_facilities
The rationale gives many details about what it’s all about: providing
consistent tagging across several features to describe in which essential
infrastructure
On 12/1/23 08:28, António Madeira wrote:
Open tanks are common in wild fires territories, like in Portugal, and
I'm probably in Spain and Greece.
Not in Australia.
They're used by helicopters and firefighters, who depend on them in
heavy mountainous regions, where it's impossible or very diffi
13 matches
Mail list logo
