Hi Volker, Le jeu. 12 janv. 2023 à 12:02, Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> The present vs future tagging table is flawed. > The landuse column shows values that are rarely used. Industrial=water > (500 uses) in practice is tagged as man_made=water_works (30k+ uses). > "sewerage" land use exists and is in practice tagged as > man_made=wastewater_plant (75k uses). > man_made=water_works isn't relative to the activity for which the land is used. It is a feature combined with its perimeter. As mentioned during RFC, we miss a scope to allow mappers to state "it's water stuff" without knowing as much about what is going on exactly there. man_made=water_works isn't the only possible value, there is man_made=pumping_station, man_made=covered_reservoir... utility=water is way simpler and cover them all. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-utility-facilities/5723/6?u=infosreseaux > Generally speaking I don't like the proposals of "wiki gardening" that > result in mappers being confronted with lists of "deprecation" warnings > every time they upload changesets that regard completely unrelated features. > Maybe I am atypical as I often map road features of interest to cyclists, > and I notice a steady increase of deprecation warnings. > Isn't this tagging gardening instead of wiki gardening? It is actually possible in editors to disable warning on untouched features to stop being warned this way. Best regards François
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
