Just mapping a Christmas shop https://christmasshack.com.au/, which, as
the name suggests!, is a shop that operates year round selling Christmas
decorations & supplies of various sorts.
Best option I could find to tag it is
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=party
Wondering if there wo
On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 at 16:27, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>
> Should we use bbq=yes or barbecue_grill=yes with campsites, caravan
> sites and camp pitches to specify the presence of a grill that can be
> used for bbq / grilling?
>
I would go for barbecue_grill=yes to show that there is "something" pr
>> *"For example, use the feature leisure=picnic_site with the property
>> tag drinking_water=yes, instead of using the separate feature tag
>> amenity=drinking_water on the same node or area."
>>
>> This example is a bad idea and mappers shouldn't be encouraged to do
>> so. amenity=drinking_water
Another user added bring_own_bbq=yes as a suggestion on the amenity=bbq page
But, getting back to the original question, which I need answered for
my draft proposal Proposed_features/Campsite_properties:
Should we use bbq=yes or barbecue_grill=yes with campsites, caravan
sites and camp pitches to
On 06/07/19 02:28, Jmapb via Tagging wrote:
On 7/5/2019 10:56 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I don't think it would be necessary to combine "bbq=no" and
"bring_own_bbq=yes" - if a feature such as a leisure=picnic_site is
tagged "bring_own_bbq=yes" that is sufficient. The tag "bbq=no", like
most tag
On 05/07/19 19:57, Mariusz wrote:
On 05.07.2019 07:05, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I've removed this statement from the page because it leads to
ambiguous data and directly contradicts the One feature per one
element rule
[Examples of bad situations:] "An area object representing a
single-use build
On 05/07/19 19:33, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
3 Jul 2019, 12:52 by o...@westnordost.de:
1.1 At the examples: for max empty weight, I propose the key
maxemptyweight. It suggests itself.
Added, with link back to this post
Here that would be called "maximum Tare weight". In the UK?
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:33 PM bkil wrote:
> Be my guest:
> intermittent=yes
> ephemeral=yes
> building=no
> permanent=no
> movable=yes
> stationary=no
> caravan=yes
> mount=trailer
> support=wheels
> foundation=no
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_restaurant
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wi
On Friday, 5 July 2019, Jmapb via Tagging wrote:
> On 7/5/2019 3:08 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> > I read joost's comment as "The operator of this map object is a
> > specific private citizen"
> > not as a redefinition of "operator."
> >
> Hah, probably. Regardless, I do think that Les Incroyables
>
On 05.07.19 11:57, Mariusz wrote:
> On 05.07.2019 07:05, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>> [Examples of bad situations:] "An area object representing a
>> single-use building with a point object inside it. Move the tags to
>> the area object and delete the point."
>
> This is common and widly accepted pr
On 7/5/2019 3:08 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
I read joost's comment as "The operator of this map object is a
specific private citizen"
not as a redefinition of "operator."
Hah, probably. Regardless, I do think that Les Incroyables
Comestibles/Incredible Edibles fits better under the brand key, or ma
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 19:40, Jmapb via Tagging
wrote:
> On 7/5/2019 12:18 PM, joost schouppe wrote:
>
> > Operator is actually "a specific private citizen"
>
> What's the source of this definition? On the English wiki, operator is
> "a company, corporation, person or any other entity who is direc
On 7/5/2019 12:18 PM, joost schouppe wrote:
Operator is actually "a specific private citizen"
What's the source of this definition? On the English wiki, operator is
"a company, corporation, person or any other entity who is directly in
charge of the current operation of a map object."
J
___
On 7/5/2019 10:56 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I don't think it would be necessary to combine "bbq=no" and
"bring_own_bbq=yes" - if a feature such as a leisure=picnic_site is
tagged "bring_own_bbq=yes" that is sufficient. The tag "bbq=no", like
most tags with value "no", can be omitted.
This is
Thanks for the help!
I wouldn't want to lose the "Les Incroyables Comestibles" info, so as to be
able to group them by project. But maybe brand=* is the better tag for
that. Operator is actually "a specific private citizen", so that'd be
operator:type=private or maybe community if it is actually r
On 7/4/2019 11:17 PM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
We've also had problems with features tagged "tourism=camp_site" or
"landuse=meadow" plus "barrier=hedge" or "barrier=wall". Is the
barrier supposed to be an area or a linear feature in this case?
I can see the confusion here, but I think this rule s
I don't think it would be necessary to combine "bbq=no" and
"bring_own_bbq=yes" - if a feature such as a leisure=picnic_site is
tagged "bring_own_bbq=yes" that is sufficient. The tag "bbq=no", like
most tags with value "no", can be omitted.
There might be times when there is "bbq=yes" and "bring_o
On 7/5/2019 2:16 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
So, what's a better term for a test prep centre, cramp school, or
tutoring office? There the rarely used tag office=tutoring, but that
doesn't quite cover a place like Kaplan or Kumon -
https://au.kumonglobal.com/ - https://www.kaptest.com/
amenity=te
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 10:42, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
I added it to
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/street_vendor%3Dyes&diff=1874089&oldid=1871846
> but I still prefer street_vendor
>
I found out yesterday there are also mobile post offices. I was
surprised.
Le 03.07.19 à 17:17, Jmapb via Tagging a écrit :
> bbq:grills=yes/no/1+
or device=* (already approved tag do describe the number
of same devices) ?
> bbq:bring_own=yes/no
or equiped=yes/no : the bbq is always there or it's an allowed
but not-equiped area and you need to bring your own ?
The other major use booking=* with *!=booking.com concerns trains
in or passing through France, I talked about it on talk-fr and transport
(the French-speaking transit mailing).
no one has so far opposed to move those in reservation=*,
but I will wait a few more days before modifying these objects
The issue I see with prep school is that it can be very easily confused with a
Preparatory School, commonly referred to as a Prep School. I believe the term
is used in both British and American English, i.e. Prepy.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Friday, 5 July 2019, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> I followed a
School=education is extraneous as a school implies an educational
institution. If you looked at education reform proposal, you would see
education=school. Cram schools are sufficiently different than academic
schools that amenity=school will not fit.
Yours, faithfully
Erkin Alp
___
Le 05.07.19 à 10:53, 石野貴之 a écrit :
> My proposal is the following:
> 1. Use a well-documented tag for the main tag. I think
> office=educational_institution would be the best, but
office=* is for office related stuff
the place where the staff do "office activities" can get an office=*
But i wou
On 05.07.2019 07:05, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I've removed this statement from the page because it leads to
ambiguous data and directly contradicts the One feature per one
element rule
[Examples of bad situations:] "An area object representing a
single-use building with a point object inside it.
1 Jul 2019, 18:41 by pla16...@gmail.com:
>
> equivalent of a mobile shop, and I'm not even sure there is one.
>
> Mobile=yes|no has the problem of confusion with cell phones.
>
> BTW, there's a fast food outlet near me set up in a shipping container at the
> side of a road.
> Theoretically mob
3 Jul 2019, 12:52 by o...@westnordost.de:
> 1.1 At the examples: for max empty weight, I propose the key maxemptyweight.
> It suggests itself.
>
Added, with link back to this post
> 1.2 At the examples: Conditionals should maybe better be catch-all, so i.e.
> axles>=3 instead of axles=3
>
Ch
Le 03.07.19 à 03:10, brad a écrit :
> Thoughts?
4) use smoothness if it suits your needs better
without changing the meaning of a tag used elsewhere in your region
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinf
Le 03.07.19 à 03:10, brad a écrit :
> Thoughts?
4) use smoothness if it suits your needs better
without changing the meaning of a tag used elsewhere in your region
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinf
Hello.
Tagging schemes for cram schools and tutorial centers have been discussed
very often,
but none of the discussion got to the solid conclusion.
I am strongly concerned about the situation, and requested for comments on
my diary.
ML: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-May/
30 matches
Mail list logo
