I don't think it would be necessary to combine "bbq=no" and "bring_own_bbq=yes" - if a feature such as a leisure=picnic_site is tagged "bring_own_bbq=yes" that is sufficient. The tag "bbq=no", like most tags with value "no", can be omitted.
There might be times when there is "bbq=yes" and "bring_own_bbq=no", if you have to use the provided grill and can't bring your own, and certainly a feature could be tagged with both "bbq=yes" and "bring_own_bbq=yes". That said, I'm happy to use the tag "barbecue_grill=yes/no" if there are other people who clearly prefer this tag to "bbq=yes/no" See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Campsite_properties for the draft proposal On 7/5/19, marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Le 03.07.19 à 17:17, Jmapb via Tagging a écrit : >> bbq:grills=yes/no/1+ > > or device=* (already approved tag do describe the number > of same devices) ? > >> bbq:bring_own=yes/no > > or equiped=yes/no : the bbq is always there or it's an allowed > but not-equiped area and you need to bring your own ? > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
