>> *"For example, use the feature leisure=picnic_site with the property >> tag drinking_water=yes, instead of using the separate feature tag >> amenity=drinking_water on the same node or area." >> >> This example is a bad idea and mappers shouldn't be encouraged to do >> so. amenity=drinking_water is far more popular tag and replacing it >> with drinking_water=yes may hurt data consumers. > > I don't think it is an issue of replacing it. But where the location of > the drinking water is unknown?
Right. It's great to map amenity=drinking_water on a node at the exact position of a drinking fountain or water tap. But if you want to say that a leisure=picnic_site has access to drinking water without creating a separate node, then use the approved and popular tag drinking_water=yes on the same area or node as the picnic_site. The key drinking_water has been used over 60,000 times and was approved in a well-developed proposal back in 2014, so I picked this example for the page. But if there is a better example (eg atm=yes and amenity=atm?) feel free to change it. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
