Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - opening hours default PH off

2015-05-20 Thread johnw
> On May 1, 2015, at 8:58 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > Am 30.04.2015 um 18:04 schrieb p...@trigpoint.me.uk > : > >>> It really makes more problems than it solves >> +1 > > +1 > > cheers > Martin +1 In Japan the public holidays are very very well

Re: [Tagging] housenumber on node and area

2015-05-20 Thread Ross
On 21/05/15 09:51, pmailkeey . wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard > wrote: Hi, We know that addr:housenumber =* can be tagged on nodes

Re: [Tagging] housenumber on node and area

2015-05-20 Thread pmailkeey .
On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard wrote: > Hi, > > We know that addr:housenumber > =* can be tagged on nodes > and > that it's very convenient. > But wrong. > A problem in tag

Re: [Tagging] RFC Reception_desk Mk2

2015-05-20 Thread pmailkeey .
On 20 May 2015 at 14:42, Kotya Karapetyan wrote: > One node, all tags is the gut feeling I get. Put all the tags on one and >> if two are the same key with different values, add the values separated by >> semicolons. >> >> If in doubt, create two nodes and use iD to combine them ;) by (shift) >>

Re: [Tagging] RFC Reception_desk Mk2

2015-05-20 Thread David Bannon
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 11:09 +1000, Warin wrote: > Link to the proposal = > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/amenity% > 3Dreception_desk > I still see this as a useful thing. David > For those not familiar with the proposal. > A Reception Desk provides a place where people (

Re: [Tagging] housenumber on node and area

2015-05-20 Thread Andreas Goss
That is the same number both on a node (once) and on the way/relation *that this node belongs to* (once)? Do you mean area when you say way? I think if a building has the address then you should not have a node for just the address. If it's a amenity, craft etc. then it's fine to put the addre

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - opening hours default PH off

2015-05-20 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi, I disagree here as it's highly dependant of the type of POI. This default might be a correct assumption for shops (in countries where that's the case), but not for - restaurants (as well as fast food, to stay in the OSM nomenclature) - hotels - fuels - swimming pools - casinos - ... Therefo

Re: [Tagging] RFC Reception_desk Mk2

2015-05-20 Thread Kotya Karapetyan
> > One node, all tags is the gut feeling I get. Put all the tags on one and > if two are the same key with different values, add the values separated by > semicolons. > > If in doubt, create two nodes and use iD to combine them ;) by (shift) > selecting both and use the + symbol to combine. > > +1

[Tagging] housenumber on node and area

2015-05-20 Thread André Pirard
Hi, We know that addr:housenumber =* can be tagged on nodes and that it's very convenient. A problem in tagging the number on a node *instead* of on an area is that someone making a nic

Re: [Tagging] RFC Reception_desk Mk2

2015-05-20 Thread pmailkeey .
On 20 May 2015 at 02:09, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have left this for a while. But I don't see it going anywhere in terms of > the tag=value. > The initial proposal started on 6 February 2015, has been voted on and > reformatted to address issues raised. > > Link to the p