On 20 May 2015 at 14:10, André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > We know that addr:housenumber > <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr>=* can be tagged on nodes > <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#How_to_map_addresses> and > that it's very convenient. > But wrong. > A problem in tagging the number on a node *instead* of on an area is that > someone making a nice copy (& paste) like below (partim) of the nice > information found in the left pane of OSM.org will inadvertently miss the > number. > Does anyone have an objection against the same number being *also* on the > node? > That is the same number both on a node (once) and on the way/relation *that > this node belongs to* (once)? > (we already have the other address information routinely duplicated and > even triplicated (associatedAddress) for the sake of consumers finding it, > so why not the address?) > > Info shouldn't be duplicated or triplicated either. -- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
