Hi, We know that addr:housenumber <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr>=* can be tagged on nodes <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#How_to_map_addresses> and that it's very convenient. A problem in tagging the number on a node *instead* of on an area is that someone making a nice copy (& paste) like below (partim) of the nice information found in the left pane of OSM.org will inadvertently miss the number. Does anyone have an objection against the same number being *also* on the node? That is the same number both on a node (once) and on the way/relation *that this node belongs to* (once)? (we already have the other address information routinely duplicated and even triplicated (associatedAddress) for the sake of consumers finding it, so why not the address?)
Cheers André. addr:city <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:city?uselang=en> ... addr:housename <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:housename?uselang=en> ... addr:postcode <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:postcode?uselang=en> ... addr:street <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:street?uselang=en> .. amenity <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity?uselang=en> ... building <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building?uselang=en> yes contact:email <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:email?uselang=en> ... contact:phone <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:phone?uselang=en> ... contact:website <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:website?uselang=en> ... craft <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft?uselang=en> ... name <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name?uselang=en> ... ...
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
