On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 11:09 +1000, Warin wrote: > Link to the proposal = > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/amenity% > 3Dreception_desk > I still see this as a useful thing.
David > For those not familiar with the proposal. > A Reception Desk provides a place where people (visitors, patients, > or > clients) arrive to be greeted, any information recorded, the relevant > person is contacted and the visitor/s, patient/s, or client/s sent > on > to the relevant person/place. > > It is particularly useful to know the location of the reception desk > when it is located away from the typical place (near a front entry) > or > where there is only one amongst a number of large buildings. First > seen > as a suggested extended tag for camp sites, thought to have a wider > application to offices, hotels and educational features. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I have changed the documentation (many times) hopefully it addresses > most issues that have been raised. > > One issue that I have not address is when someone wants to have one > node with more than one amenity on it. > This occurs for many key=value situations. > Firstly .. it would be possible to create two nodes and place the > different values on the different nodes. That is the solution I use. > Secondly ... it has been suggested to use a format of a subtag where > value2=yes is placed under the key=value1. > e.g. > amenity=bbq > reception_desk=yes > > I have not seen (nor sought!) documentation for this .. as I don't use > it. > > ------------------------------- > > The present proposal format in the upper section shows what the result > should look like, while the lower section has the verbose explanation > etc. > I don't like the title 'Rationale' .. and have appended 'Verbose > Explanation' as a simpler, clearer title. > I have also added sections on the key, value etc .. as I think that is > easier to follow (and I don't get mixed up in my documentation! :-) ). > > -------------------- > So there it is .. voting soon? Depending on any discussion relevant to > the key-value. > Discussion of the format etc ... ok .. but not fundamental to the > proposal itself, so should not delay voting. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
