On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> Although there are other uses of map data, the
> primary use is for renderers. We don't abuse our own tagging systems
> to suit a specific version of a specific renderer, but we certainly
> "tag for renderers"... Going out of our way to avo
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> So it looks like the general consensus is that a link should only
> intersect other links except at the ends?
>
Clarification: I mean that each "independent section" of the link or
connecting string of links should intersect no non-links (
Since no one has yet voted I have changed the key to
cycleway=advanced_stop_line , this gets rid of the abbreviation. This
new key should be easier to work out what it means.
Alex
On 17/06/10 21:42, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/6/17 Alex Wardle :
>> Could people please look and vote on this
2010/6/17 Alex Wardle :
> Could people please look and vote on this proposal.
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Advanced_stop_line
IMHO before voting you should make the actual tags to describe the
situation more visible on the proposal page. There were also comments
that "as
2010/6/17 :
> "The highway tag is the primary tag used for highways. It is often the
> only tag. It is a very general and sometimes vague description of the
> importance of the highway for the road grid. "
>
> The term "importance" isn't defined
Why shouldn't importance not be defined? It is po
2010/6/17 Zeke Farwell :
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:21 AM, John Smith
> wrote:
>>
>> Everything you talked about above is specifically about rendering, not
>> about mapping, in terms of mapping airports you really need to base
>> things on a 1:1 basis
> If you are making
> an aviation specific m
So it looks like the general consensus is that a link should only
intersect other links except at the ends?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Could people please look and vote on this proposal.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Advanced_stop_line
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 16 Jun 2010, at 20:54 , Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> So a trunk road crosses a primary road, but you're not allowed to turn
> at the crossing. Instead you have to turn before or after and loop
> around to get from one to the other. If this connecting status is the
> sole reason through traffic wo
The only problem is that, in this case, it's not a normal-looking
"sliproad/ramp", but a surface street that would normally be tagged
highway=residential or unclassified. Here are a few examples:
http://maps.google.com/maps?saddr=US-1+S&daddr=40.500421,-74.398974&geocode=FaQCagIdiLKQ-w%3
On 17 June 2010 19:12, MatsH wrote:
> I'll be happy about comments, I'd like to set this up fr voting rather
> quick.
I'd be more concerned with comments than getting round to voting since
it's mostly pointless.
I personally don't see a big issue with this tag, it seems pretty
straight forward,
On 17 June 2010 19:23, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> It's not a hard question: what tag do I use to show that one of many
It's not a hard answer either, you just don't like the answer it seems.
> roads is the road that's marked on the ground as the connection
> between two crossing highways? This en
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Richard Mann
> wrote:
>> On the specific example, in the UK these would be tertiarys: an
>> ordinary street that serves a "through" or within-city distribution
>> function. They'd have to be pretty domina
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Richard Mann
wrote:
> Nathan - there's some form of setting in your email account that means
> that every time you reply to a thread we see a new thread starting
> (dropping the Re: prefix, maybe?). This makes it very hard to follow
> the thread, as the emails get
Nathan - there's some form of setting in your email account that means
that every time you reply to a thread we see a new thread starting
(dropping the Re: prefix, maybe?). This makes it very hard to follow
the thread, as the emails get out of order.
On the specific example, in the UK these would
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Simone Saviolo
wrote:
> Seeing the pictures, in fact, I wouldn't tag them as links either.
> IMHO, they're not really links, they're just streets that happen to
> offer a connection between the two main roads.
I agree, _link does not seem to apply well to that ty
John Smith wrote:
>On 17 June 2010 18:49, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> But how would the routing software (or person reading the map) know to
>> use these specific streets? In both photos you can see the guide signs
>> that the state has posted to direct traffic along them; it also (at
>> least some
Hey everybody,
after having this proposal drafting for way too long, I finally put this
to RFC.
See here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/automated_external_defibrillator
It's about an AED (Automated external defibrillator). An AED is a device
designed for the layman to trea
On 17 June 2010 18:49, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> But how would the routing software (or person reading the map) know to
> use these specific streets? In both photos you can see the guide signs
> that the state has posted to direct traffic along them; it also (at
> least sometimes) maintains them,
Simone Saviolo wrote:
>> So how would you tag them, so a person or routing software can see
>> which of the many streets is the connection?
>
>Again, judging from the pictures, I wouldn't tag any of those ways in
>a special manner. They're similar streets that form a grid; a routing
>software just
2010/6/17 Nathan Edgars II :
> Simone Saviolo wrote:
>>Seeing the pictures, in fact, I wouldn't tag them as links either.
>>IMHO, they're not really links, they're just streets that happen to
>>offer a connection between the two main roads.
>
> So how would you tag them, so a person or routing soft
Simone Saviolo wrote:
>Seeing the pictures, in fact, I wouldn't tag them as links either.
>IMHO, they're not really links, they're just streets that happen to
>offer a connection between the two main roads.
So how would you tag them, so a person or routing software can see
which of the many street
2010/6/17 Nathan Edgars II :
> Simone Saviolo wrote:
>>The wiki seems pretty clear to me: the definition for trunk_link says
>>
>>"The link roads (sliproads/ramps) leading to/from a trunk road from/to
>>a trunk road or lower class highway."
>>
>>So if this connection leads from a trunk to a primary
Simone Saviolo wrote:
>The wiki seems pretty clear to me: the definition for trunk_link says
>
>"The link roads (sliproads/ramps) leading to/from a trunk road from/to
>a trunk road or lower class highway."
>
>So if this connection leads from a trunk to a primary, then the
>connection is a trunk_lin
> Nathan Edgars II (nerou...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> So a trunk road crosses a primary road, but you're not allowed to turn
>> at the crossing. Instead you have to turn before or after and loop
>> around to get from one to the other. If this connecting status is the
>> sole reason through traffic woul
Nathan Edgars II (nerou...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Charlie wrote:
>> Maybe you could think about it in terms of speed of travel - do cars
>> typically travel at high speeds, moderate speeds or residential speeds
>> - and is the road multi-lane, two-lane etc?
> That's not what highway classification is
26 matches
Mail list logo
