On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: > So it looks like the general consensus is that a link should only > intersect other links except at the ends? > Clarification: I mean that each "independent section" of the link or connecting string of links should intersect no non-links (including unmapped driveways) along the way. In other words, http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/5696070 is fine, since it's really two links, one from I-87 to 230th and one from 230th to I-87. On the other hand, http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/52557869 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/52557872, among other links south of Elizabeth and West Lawn, should be at most primary_link, since the "independent sections" from NJ 4 can only make it that far before hitting residential streets.
But what about http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/11660654, a typical U-turn jughandle that has two (mapped) driveway intersections? Do the driveways really prevent it from being a link the whole way? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
