In a message dated 3/8/2006 5:04:48 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lets
take the following example of Hebrews 1:1God, whoat sundry
timesandin divers mannersspakein time
pastunto the fathersbythe
prophets,
I hope I'm not stirring up unnecessary trouble, but
Lets take the following example of Hebrews 1:1
God, who
at sundry times
and
in divers manners
spake
in time past
unto the fathers
by
the prophets,
Here we have 3 empty G3588 tags.
So do you mean that I regard the NSM and DPM to make a match?
So would this then become:
God, who
at sundry tim
Troy,
I am starting to implement the definite article merge. But I have a
question as to the your instructions. See below.
DM
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
NT: Articles: All simple definite articles are left as empty tags
in the verses. The logic was that in English we have both an
indefin
David Blue (Mailing List Addy) wrote:
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 13:07, DM Smith wrote:
There are no Hebrew Morphology modules available, at this time.
The old testament does have Thayer morphology codes in it.
The OT may have OLB TVM codes (basically extended Strong's numbers used
to indica
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 13:07, DM Smith wrote:
> There are no Hebrew Morphology modules available, at this time.
> The old testament does have Thayer morphology codes in it.
> Are you thinking of something more or something else, or fixing what is
> present?
> If more or else what morphology co
Thanks Lynn,
This will help identify repeated problems.
DM
L.Allan-pbio wrote:
I know zilch Greek or Hebrew, but could perhaps help with cleaning
up the redundant/flawed tags in KJV there is a verse that is
over 10,000 chars long, (Mark 1:9?) and several over 4,000 tags long.
Stay tun
Check to see if it is already entered, first.
If it is, perhaps add a comment on it with specific examples.
Here is the basic game plan.
I am extracting the module into books where each book is a supposedly
well-formed OSIS fragment. That is each is
book goes here
I am then going to run this
Lynn,
thanks for pointing this out.
To be sure that it won't be forgotten, please file a bug at crosswire.org/bugs
for the "modules" project.
mg
Am Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2006 18:10 schrieb L.Allan-pbio:
> >> I know zilch Greek or Hebrew, but could perhaps help with cleaning up
> >> the redund
I know zilch Greek or Hebrew, but could perhaps help with cleaning up the
redundant/flawed tags in KJV there is a verse that is over 10,000
chars long, (Mark 1:9?) and several over 4,000 tags long.
Stay tuned. With Troy's help, I should have the work area set up before
too long with the K
And that is some of the reason SWORD has such a good reputation as it
has - because you try to be honest to the texts and present it so that
the interpretors can make the decision for themselves! That is what
qualifies it a scientifically usable tool, and makes it prosper in
environments with d
The problem with the pronouns When you impose a divine
pronoun (either the "thee" or capitalization) you tell nothing about the
underlying text - only about the underlying faith of the translator(s). It
is interesting that the NASB *did* at one time use the "divine thee" and, in
Psalm
It might be nice for you to offer people the choice and the chances. I think that is what someone was indicating when they stated that we ought not to make this a theologically based decision but rather a choice based on our best re-construction of the material. The choice comes in that SWORD off
As this has become a personal opinion piece I will weigh in!
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 18:44 +0100, Kristian Due wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just wanted to add two more reasons (in addition to Chris' good point
> of hyperothodoxy) why you should not capitalize the pronouns in KJV. You
> are probably aware o
Hi!
Just wanted to add two more reasons (in addition to Chris' good point
of hyperothodoxy) why you should not capitalize the pronouns in KJV. You
are probably aware of them anyway, but I think them a little funny, so
they deserve to be mentioned.
1) The singular pronouns (e.g. thou/thee
Question on the "gold" standard for "jots and tittles". I am looking for
a hard copy to be the final say on spelling, capitalization, punctuation
and the like.
The module we have is titled as a 1769 version.
In cleaning up the module, we will be comparing the text against one or
more etexts.
Yeah yeah, we need toolbar buttons in BibleCS; I get the point already!
:) Thanks Geoffrey, I wouldn't have thought to have both modules open
and tab between the two.
-Troy.
Geoffrey w Hastings wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:46:29 -0700 "L.Allan-pbio"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
L
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:46:29 -0700 "L.Allan-pbio"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Love to have your help.
> >
>
> Actually, I believe someone previously advocated a KJV-Lite that
> didn't have Strong's numbering (and left out some other tags). I would
think
> that would be a valuable resource
Chris (and Brandon),
Thanks for pointing out that the printed texts are published with
lowercase pronouns. This mandates that we publish our module this way,
as well.
Chris,
I've ignored the rest of your message ;)
-Troy.
Chris Little wrote:
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
OT: It personally frustrates me that the body of the text we use for
the KJV OT has lowercased all personal pronouns for God. Can we find a
better text? I'm fairly certain the KJV in most of its printed
incarnations had these uppercase.
Please don't change thi
L.Allan-pbio wrote:
Love to have your help.
I don't think that knowledge of Hebrew or Greek is necessary for most
of the changes.
I know zilch Greek or Hebrew, but could perhaps help with cleaning up
the redundant/flawed tags in KJV there is a verse that is over
10,000 chars long, (Mar
Love to have your help.
I don't think that knowledge of Hebrew or Greek is necessary for most of
the changes.
I know zilch Greek or Hebrew, but could perhaps help with cleaning up the
redundant/flawed tags in KJV there is a verse that is over 10,000 chars
long, (Mark 1:9?) and several o
David Blue (Mailing List Addy) wrote:
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 07:50, DM Smith wrote:
The KJV Bible is the most downloaded Sword module at CrossWire.
It is often the first impression that people get when looking at all the
different Sword front-ends.
There are some problems with the KJV t
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 07:50, DM Smith wrote:
> The KJV Bible is the most downloaded Sword module at CrossWire.
> It is often the first impression that people get when looking at all the
> different Sword front-ends.
>
> There are some problems with the KJV that have been reported and need to
DM,
I am really excited about your desire to update the KJV2003 text. Much
work went into that project, and a special thank you go to all the
volunteers who helped tag the NT!
http://crosswire.org/sword/kjv2003/status/
To find the most recent raw data, all things KJV2003 live on ou
The KJV Bible is the most downloaded Sword module at CrossWire.
It is often the first impression that people get when looking at all the
different Sword front-ends.
There are some problems with the KJV that have been reported and need to
be fixed.
Anyone else interested in working on upgradi
25 matches
Mail list logo
