e of their existence).
That being said, I have no strong opinion on this, though if we don't
publish a list of current advisors, as seems to be the case, I would
tend to support abolition.
[...]
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
__
d them
superior.
I use this opportunity to thank Dr. Michlmayr for his service on the board. And
thanks to Jimmy Kaplowitz for accepting to serve as president.
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-
On 2018-07-04 09:38, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Philippe Cloutier [2018-07-02 18:01]:
1. At least avoid collapsing with the "F2F" "acronym"
I removed F2F since it doesn't really matter where the action items
came from.
Sounds like a great solution; thanks Martin
deciding to use RT to power a general-purpose ITS, I
suggest to make a decent comparison of both.
On 2016-07-30 10:55, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
According to Joshua D. Drake, SPI has an issue tracking system for
reimbursements, but not for other issues (see
http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi
On 2018-02-17 13:12, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Filipus Klutiero [2018-02-17 10:10]:
http://spi-inc.org/corporate/rt/
Thank you very much. I would replace "you can open a new ticket by
sending an email to the following address at the |rt.spi-inc.org|
domain" with "you can open
On 2018-02-16 11:42, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Filipus Klutiero [2018-02-13 07:09]:
This leaves a huge question: who can consult the tracker? Can anyone
who is not a director consult any ticket? And is the answer to that
available publically?
The board and certain volunteers and contractors
On 2018-01-02 03:43, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Filipus Klutiero [2018-01-01 21:32]:
Thanks for this. I would be delighted to discover an existing
general-purpose ITS, but that does not look easy. I requested one on
spi-general on 2016-07-30 via the quoted email and nobody replied
anything
Hi Robert,
On 2018-01-01 19:39, Robert Brockway wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jan 2018, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi,
On 2016-07-30 10:55, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
According to Joshua D. Drake, SPI has an issue tracking system for
reimbursements, but not for other issues (see
http://lists.spi-inc.org
Hi,
On 2016-07-30 10:55, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
According to Joshua D. Drake, SPI has an issue tracking system for
reimbursements, but not for other issues (see
http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/2016-July/003466.html ). If
there is already a genera-purpose ITS, this is indeed
I cannot find a list of SPI employees anywhere on spi-inc.org.
A list indicating each employee's role and which would quantify each one's work
would help determine if we should seek more, less or different staff.
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecl
On 2017-10-09 10:28, Ian Jackson wrote:
Philippe Cloutier writes ("MediaWiki (Re: Issue #2 - Allow contributions to website
from browser)"):
2016-08-14 11:05 GMT-04:00 Filipus Klutiero :
The way one can contribute to SPI's website is explained on
http://www.spi-inc.org/ :
.
without parties like SPI's.
I have no issues with substance.
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
ing system for Board elections is unique to SPI and has several
problems; notably, a potentially suboptimal representativeness.
[...]
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
On 2017-03-08 09:29, Ian Jackson wrote:
Filipus Klutiero writes ("Re: Final proposed Board resolution for Board elections
voting system"):
Thank you Ian. Here are my remarks.
On 2017-03-08 06:43, Ian Jackson wrote:
1. SPI should elect its Board using a roughly-proportional voting
f the Rules.
9. The SPI Secretary is requested to liase with Ian Jackson, so that
the necessary changes to SPI software and infrastructure can be
identified and implemented.
Typo "liase"
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
nvince me; and that I am not going
to convince you.
Ian, if your beliefs are accurate, then I think it would be more efficient to
stop trying to convince Barak than to state these beliefs.
[...]
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
___
Hi Dimitri,
On 2017-03-03 11:26, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
On 2 March 2017 at 18:07, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
On 1 March 2017 at 13:47, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
I have received tens of mails from FVC and none discussed monotonicity or
any technical point.
This was not a comment on the
see such
insistence on an argument as weak as popularity.
[...]
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
voting reform, that is quite wrong. I won't counter with a simplistic
explanation, but merely point out that most such organisations are interested
in multi-district elections.
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
___
Spi-general
on the substance of Barak's claim.
[...]
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
been members of the board.
If we manage to collect such data, if the issue persists after the board is
elected with access to attendance statistics, and if these statistics show
abnormally low attendance and variability among members, then I would consider
more drastic solutions.
--
F
as become.
If there is concern that discussion about identifying the proposed changes is
hurting discussion about the proposed changes, I recommend retitling subthreads
about the former so the precise topic can be quickly determined.
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
On 2016-10-27 08:46, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:46:42PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Was such a situation already discussed on spi-board?
Certainly while I was on the board there was.
Thanks Neil
[...]
If you do not know, could you provide a concrete example
On 2016-10-27 06:10, Henrik Ingo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2016-10-18 08:57, Henrik Ingo wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Filipus Klutiero
wrote:
Any matter, where a failure of the opposite side to act within a
certain time will benefit or
On 2016-10-26 21:21, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 10/26/2016 05:46 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Henrik,
henrik
Was such a situation already discussed on spi-board? If so, could you
estimate the frequency? If you do not know, could you provide a concrete
example?
While I was on board there
Hi Joshua,
On 2016-10-26 21:20, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 10/26/2016 05:49 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Joshua,
On 2016-10-17 14:19, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 10/15/2016 06:57 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This replies to both Joshua and Peter.
Right so there are many types of legal
Hi Joshua,
On 2016-10-17 14:19, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 10/15/2016 06:57 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This replies to both Joshua and Peter.
Right so there are many types of legal issues. The one you bring up is
fine to be public. However there are others that are not.
Joshua, could you
Hi Henrik,
On 2016-10-18 08:57, Henrik Ingo wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Joshua, could you provide an example legal issue which is private (and, of
course, which has to be)?
Any matter, where a failure of the opposite side to act within a
certain time will
be public. However there are others that are not.
Joshua, could you provide an example legal issue which is private (and, of
course, which has to be)?
Sincerely,
JD
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
___
Spi-general mailing
On 2016-10-08 15:42, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 10/08/2016 09:38 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thank you
spi-board is a list of the board of directors to communicate. It's
also used as a contact address for the board.
OK, but in terms of content, what discussions would be
Hi Martin,
On 2016-10-04 14:33, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Filipus Klutiero [2016-10-01 12:49]:
http://www.spi-inc.org/contact/mailinglists/ lists 5 mailing lists
of SPI. Except for the first 2, there is no description of what
content each has or should receive. The descriptions of spi-private
member of. Board elections is one topic
sometimes treated on that list, but a private list should not be designated as
the proper forum for electoral discussions.
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi
Hi Ian,
On 2016-09-19 06:54, Ian Jackson wrote:
Filipus Klutiero writes ("Issue #4 - Make membership (more) public"):
I request to make membership public or more public. I do not see
what part of the information currently stored in applications could
be private, so I think applicati
ations or review the membership
process
3. provide credit to application managers
4. easy identifying possible bugs in the application process
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.
Hi Neil,
On 2016-08-23 11:00, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 09:02:22PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2016-08-20 12:20, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
Are you saying that you think people don't contribute because of the
overhead of submitting changes to the ikiwiki+git s
* Archive <http://lists.spi-inc.org/private/spi-board/>
This eventually links to spi-bo...@lists.spi-inc.org
It is unclear whether there is a difference between bo...@spi-inc.org and
spi-bo...@lists.spi-inc.org, and if so, which difference.
--
Fili
On 2016-08-20 12:20, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 08:55:48PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2016-08-14 16:25, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
Based on experience managing a number of wikis I think the workload
involved in helping people who want to contribute at present but
Hi Bdale,
On 2016-08-18 22:53, Bdale Garbee wrote:
Filipus Klutiero writes:
While having to learn a new syntax is already quite a disadvantage, at
least for me
It is for all of us... which is exactly why we moved to the ikiwiki+git
combination... because at least at the time it used
on. Knowing that a direct access would come
would help, but only those who will make sustained contributions and who
already know they will. If you meant to encourage contribution, I am not the
person to address. Experience has taught me not to contribute in such
conditions. Putting such a stat
On 2016-08-14 16:25, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:05:22AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
The way one can contribute to SPI's website is explained on
http://www.spi-inc.org/ :
This website is managed using ikiwiki+git. You can view the revision
history via gitweb
rently. Drupal is another option, which
is in Debian testing.
This does not request any specific authorizations. Pages could use the soft
security of open wikis, be only editable by SPI members, require approval by a
team, or a mix of all of these policies depending on the topic.
--
Fili
On 2016-08-01 05:06, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 06:43:37PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
SPI has "non-contributing members" and "contributing members".
Contributing members have access to statistics about SPI's membership.
This is inaccurate. *Al
ave formally requested SPI to
implement such a system in thread "Issue #0 - No general-purpose issue tracking
system": http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/2016-July/003493.html
[...]
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
___
Hi Jonathan,
On 2016-07-17 15:46, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:31:23AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2015-06-28, I applied for SPI membership. I did not obtain any followup
until 2016-02-03, when I received the forwarded mail.
After such a delay, my interest in SPI
atistics public
would be a good and easy first step. I am hereby asking to make the existing
metrics available to anyone.
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
___
Spi-general mailing list
Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org
http://lists
with all open source engines I used. I
have no strong opinion on which engine should be picked. Obviously, having a
web interface would be extremely important, particularly one which is not
read-only, though email notifications are very useful.
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
On 2016-07-19 09:02, Ian Jackson wrote:
Filipus Klutiero writes ("Re: Voting system for elections"):
On 2016-07-18 09:29, Ian Jackson wrote:
This is especially true given that our variant of Condorcet is still
interpreting a ballot "1. Z 2. X" as not pr
) would be better.
STV would certainly better reflect the diversity of our views, but that does
not mean it will lead to choices closer to the choices which votes from the
whole electorate would yield.
[...]
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecl
ed in. Could this be intentional?
Forwarded Message
Subject:SPI Member application for Filipus Klutiero
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:03:57 +
From: SPI Membership Committee
To: chea...@gmail.com
Dear Filipus Klutiero,
It has come to our attention that at some point
49 matches
Mail list logo
