go in more than one place zip them in the file structure in
> the place were they should go.
>
Hi Brian,
The communigatefaq site has three how-to's that may be helpful.
http://www.communigatefaq.com/cgatefaq/
Tom
---
This SF.NET e
I'll never complain about my old PII-400 taking 8.5 seconds to process a
message through spamd again.
-tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas Kinghorn
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 4:32 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Su
laythings\.biz
|exoticsitestevedore\.com|explodeyour\.com|expocard\.rd10\.net)\b/i
describe BigEvilList_72 Generated BigEvilList_72
score BigEvilList_723.0
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul Barbeau
> Sent: F
Upgrade to 1.14.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Arpi
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 7:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] new chicnpox --lint failed
>
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading chichekpox to Version 1.11, spa
Ah, I see now. It's probably the link to exclaimer.co.uk which is a
product that puts boilerplate disclaimers at the end of Exchange 200x
emails. Lawyers love those things. Idunno why it's in there.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[
ed_hits 100
If I were an irate user who didn't want some damned spam filter scanning my
mail, I might not be satisfied with that. (The X-Spam-Status: will still
be there with the score.) If max_size was made settable in user_prefs (or
SQL), users who don't
Conference announcements often contain the phrase "the following format"
when requesting submissions, which matches the THE_FOLLOWING_FORM rule,
which has a quite high score. Adding \W to the end of the pattern prevents
this, and seems safe in gen
s
> > this, and seems safe in general.
>
> \b would be better there.
Oops. You're right.
Tom
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Looks like the waitpid() loop got put in the wrong place in spamd in the
2.0 release. It needs to be the last statement in the for, but it ended up
as the last statement in the spawned sub, so runs in the wrong process.
Tom
*** spamd/spamd.raw.origFri Jan 18 20:30:51 2002
--- spamd
riate corpus. One of
the problems with Razor is that non-spam accidentally gets added to the
database.
Tom
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
to accept connections but defer processing them until it's done
(else the listen() backlog might fill and new connections be refused).
Tom
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamass
port; Change the spamc config to point to that new
> port. Kill the old spamd. Start a new spamd on the normal port; Change
> spamc to point to the normal port. Kill the alternate-port spamd.
Cute. It's not that critical, but if it were I might find the time to
write the SIGHUP handle
s it was matching lists that had no
real similarities in the usernames.
Tom
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
?:\b\1[^@,]*\2.{0,30}?){9,}/is
header VERY_SUSP_CC_RECIPS Cc =~
/\b([a-z][a-z])[^@,]{0,20}(@[-a-z0-9_\.]{0,30}).{0,30}?(?:\b\1[^@,]*\2.{0,30}?){9,}/is
Tom
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
I haven't installed 2.1, but I agree that the new scores are worrisome.
With large scores like this (positive or negative), very small
perturbations in input can cause wildly different results, which seems
undesirable. I'd like to hear Justin's take on this, if he's not
electronic communications are considered
property of UC, privacy has a very high priority. To wit:
http://www.ucop.edu/ucophome/policies/ec/html/
It's probably wise to check with each of our institutions on
privacy matters beforehand. A lawsuit is a bad thing!
Tom
========
ou could say from just this analysis is that rules that were
> never hit could possibly be deleted.
>
I wondered why I hadn't seen Dan's post so I looked in my SPAM folder and
there it was. SA gave it 23.6 Hits :-)
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Shor
sassin no longer tests full tests against decoded text;
>use rawbody for that.
using:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.20 (devel $Id: SpamAssassin.pm,v 1.77 200
2/04/06 19:28:30 hughescr Exp $)
--
Viele Grüße
Tom
___
Don&#x
?? :-)
>
I don't know how you're doing this, but my Ham and Spam public folders work exactly as
specified. Are you certain your users aren't forwarding them there, but rather
dragging & dropping from Outlook? Are your users connecting to the server via
Chris,
A google of [reg2rule] and [reg2rule.pl] brings up nada. Throw me a bone?
fwiw, I blacklist 'em when they come in, and my average spam score is up in the 40s.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/VirusBounceRules
-Original Message-
From: Steve Combs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Sobig virus blocking
Can someone help me write a rule to block the sobgi viru
I must be doing something stupid, or have something misconfigured. My
server times out on Pyzor tests about 90% of the time, and on DCC tests
about 5-10% of the time. I've set the timeouts to 10 seconds. My
average message analysis time due to these tests taking so long is 13-15
seconds. It was
Keep in mind when you modify 20_head_tests.cf it'll be overwritten with
each subsequent upgrade of SpamAssassin. Your local.cf won't.
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:06 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTE
http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html
It adds points to the total score, as in any other SA test. See the RAZOR2_CHECK and
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE rules.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Burkhouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Su
-spam.html
http://www.geocities.com/scottlhenderson/spamfilter.html
http://www.advosys.ca/papers/printable/postfix-filtering.html
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: John B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtal
Oh yeah: If I were running Imail (I don't, but I play a person who does on TV) I'd at
least give a cursory glance to IMGATE.
http://imgate.meiway.com/
> -Original Message-
> From: John B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
Somebody already answered the syntax for modifying your scores in your local.cf, so...
The auto-learn "bayes evaluator" doesn't take the Bayes scores into account when
deciding whether to learn as spam or ham. So you could have autolearn threshold set
to 10, have your Bayes tests at 20 points,
ES_99 I don't need to sa-learn it.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Gabrielson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 1:03 PM
> To: Tom Meunier; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Changing Bayes scoring
>
>
grabs
them in some really (to a human eye) bizarre contexts.
Also, out of curiosity: do you find that the spamassassin-talk emails
with attached spams score high enough to meet your auto-learn threshold?
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Carlo Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sen
Because without a few hundred messages, it would be completely and utterly useless?
It would be like meeting an airline pilot who was 5'7" tall and had a scar on his left
cheek and wore his hat backwards. Bayes would think that scars on left cheeks were as
reliable an indicator of airline-pilo
y darned quickly. Managed to get through with only 2 FPs in the
first couple of days, and by then it had trained itself up to several thousand
hams/spams.
-tom
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thin
ts=-1.3
This means that the only spams you'll auto-learn as spam are ones that are NOT within
4 points of your "spam level" setting. So in your case, you simply cannot learn spams
<9 and you simply cannot learn hams >1. No matter what you set your
auto_learn_thresholds t
Hi Dave, hope I can help here beyond parroting what I've read & played with...
> > On this one, it's because autolearn learns the message pre-Bayes
> > test. Without your Bayes_90, that message scored under 1.9 points,
> > and so it was autolearned. The other reason that applies here is
> > expl
http://useast.spamassassin.org/tests.html
You've got negative scores all over that thing. Add them up.
> -Original Message-
> From: landy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 5:31 AM
> To: SA
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] why so low
>
> i have
There are already tests for SpamCop and NJABL:
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
RCVD_IN_NJABL
X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY
X_NJABL_DIALUP
You can see what blacklists are tested by default, and their assigned scores, at
http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html
For examples of rules for alternative blacklists, see
1. It *is* the case indeed. Look at your email. Since Osirusoft has
blacklisted the entire internet, every one would have that test flagged,
wouldn't it? Yes. It doesn't, does it? No. Setting it to 0 disables
the test.
2. Even if it *did* run the test, if a test were to score zero points,
Feed it 1400 more?
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kiem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Yes I don't expect it to activate in SA until then but how can you get
> it to over 200 when I feed it 134 emails but the db says it
lter as a memory filesystem ("tmpfs" in Linux and Solaris). These
filesystems are thousands of times faster than physical disk and are ideal for
short-lived temp files.
-tom
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to
You are correct. It needs 68 more spams.
> -Original Message-
> From: James Herschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Not sure if my Bayesian filter is adding to
> the score
> ...
>
>
[snip]
> Sep 9 10:
if you run spamassassin -D --lint it will show you a dbug line:
debug: bayes corpus size: nspam = [number], nham = [number]
> -Original Message-
> From: James Herschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Plus I'd just like to know how much further I
> have to go before the Bayes kicks in
Yes, you're not running spamd as root, but you ran spamassassin -D --lint as root.
Note the different paths to the bayes databases in your output.
> -Original Message-
> From: James Herschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:07 PM
> To: To
C, if the headers themselves
don't break any rules.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: jpf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] SA only ran 1 test??
>
> I rec'd the following mai
not
resemble words. Also note that this email has very unusual spacing between words, and
does funny things with the placement of punctuation. It probably confused Bayes.
You'll want to learn it.
For some reason I didn't see the spam header report on this email, so this is all
I'm mulling over whether to make some SA rules for some of the more common urban
legends and virus hoaxes. Has anyone played with this, that is willing to share
experiences?
-tom
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welco
"Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 10:19:37 +1100"
-tom
> -Original Message-
> http://www.iab.org/Documents/icann-vgrs-response.html
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://
I think the linked IAB missive is related to this:
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2003-01/msg00023.html
WTF is Verisign doing anyway? Deciding the Internet is their own private toy? And
everyone in the world is using it at their (verisign's) whim?
-tom
> -Original
http://blackholes.us/
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kiem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Recognising dynamic rr.com IPs
>
> I'm getting sick of all the spam that comes from rr.com and
> have been b
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alan
> Fullmer
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 September 2003 12:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] help with master.cf and filter
>
>
> alright, one more question is there any way i can remove t
skip_rbl_checks 1
#even though they're default if installed anyway...
use_razor2 1
use_pyzor 1
use_dcc 1
You've disabled the Osirusoft tests, I hope. Those hit everything on the Internet.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Covington, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Define "safe" - I stick with the default of 250kb and have never had an issue with it.
I can't see receiving a spam anywhere near that size, that wouldn't also trigger an
attachment blocking rule on my gateway MTA.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Fun
Absolutely.
www.exit0.us/index.php/VirusBounceRules
among other things.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivar Magne Auestad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Qu
>
That'd be like that New Shimmer! It's a virus AND a banned executable attachment! I
have tools designed to deal with both of those, and SpamAssassin isn't one of them.
-tom
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
rk.
I seeing this also. A message I saw on another list earlier today stated
that there seemed to be a bug in the virus that sometimes allowed it to send
its message without the exe. as a result the virus scanners were missing it.
HTH,
--
..Tom Registered Linux User #14522h
SpamAssassin doesn't bounce mail, period. If you want it to bounce mail, please do
so. If you don't, don't. Further documentation in your MTA's man pages.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Regis Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, Se
no avail as well. Update and perl modules. Checked
all permissions.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
--
Regards,
Tom
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
n to, "Well, that isn't really optimal, so don't overdo it."
Keep in mind that a "large corpus" is optimal, but the necessary corpus
to get Bayes working is 200 hams & 200 spams.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Bayes, RBL checks, Razor, DCC, Pyzor.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 8:58 AM
> To: spamassassin talk
> Subject: [SAtalk] Really really simple spams - not enough to
> accumulate 4 points
>
Why, Google of course!
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/
Yes, it works with qmail.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomáš Macek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 8:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Autodele
Oh pooh. Ignore me. Of course Patrick is right; it doesn't support qmail.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 9:51 AM
> To: 'Tomáš Macek'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on scor
Spamstats does that.
http://www.gryzor.com/tools/
> -Original Message-
> From: Markus Gaugusch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Better logging?
>
> Hi,
> I'm using spamassassin on our relay server (with pos
It's not abysmal. You just don't understand it. Most people get in
excess of 99% of spam with SpamAssassin. Isn't it great to know that
SpamAssassin is so well geared against false positives that you're
TRYING to send a spammy email and can't do it?
http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html
Break
en the
one-in-500 that gets through. Honest, Mike. Try it. It may seem counterintuitive,
but it really does work. It's actually quite difficult to hand-construct a spam.
That is expected behavior.
Good luck,
-tom
---
This sf.net emai
ical question #6: Why autolearn only on the
> certainly spam? Most of them already score high on Bayes,
> why not train on the borderlines where bayes could push it
> over the edge? I get a lot of 3.9s and 4.2s with no (or
> little) affecting score from bayes.
To guard against mistakes
SpamAssassin doesn't block mail. All it does is mark it up for content.
That mail seems to have been marked up for spam content correctly.
Therefore, your problem is not with SpamAssassin but rather with the
product that you've configured to quarantine mail.
> -Original Message-
> From:
Go check your filesystem rights on those file & directories. That's happened to me
before, and I was waiting for it to happen this time too, and mysteriously, it didn't.
My gateway boxen must be contagious. :)
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Heggood [mai
I think the main thrust of his answer was that Google Is Your Friend.
http://www.gryzor.com/tools/
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Knuth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > First hit after googling for spamstats and perl:
> > http://freshmeat.net/projects/spams
You could probably make some of that happen yourself by implementing some of the
blacklists at http://www.blackholes.us
See http://www.blackholes.us/docs/usage.html#spamassassin for usage info.
-tom
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September
Why not just go get 80 spams from the public corpus? It'll be not optimal, but it'll
be better than forcing it with 120.
http://spamassassin.org/publiccorpus/
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 10:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed a few months ago, and no definitive answer was given.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Ledbetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Auto-whitelist (AWL) enable/disable?
>
>
> H
ne. Anyhow, I do not want to break the POP before SMTP and the
SA SQL user prefs since qmail-scanner passes the user info to SA. All I
want next is SA to pass it to Vexira and Vexira will call qmail's
sendmail for delivery.
Any Ideas Greatly ap
it's working fine. Anyhow, I do not want to break the POP before
SMTP and the SA SQL user prefs since qmail-scanner passes the user info to SA. All I want next
is SA to pass it to Vexira and Vexira will call qmail's
sendmail for delivery.
Any
Ideas Greatly appreciated!
-Tom
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Scott Rothgaber wrote:
> Mike Carlson wrote:
>
> > What is the best way to kill spamassassin and restart it again after making
> > a change to the local.cf file?
>
> `/usr/local/etc/rc.d/spamd.sh restart' on FreeBSD.
>
> IIRC, this just kills and restarts the daemon. I seem
; option on a customers box today, without avail. It almost
> drove me crazy...
Tools > Options > Email Options > When Forwarding > Attach Original Message.
or from the message editing interface itself:
Insert > Item and browse through your
1. It's okay to train with the spam with Spamassassin markup. sa-learn
ignores the markup.
2. It's not okay to train with "this month's sent-mail" - you need to
be training it with mail that reflects the type of mail you GET, not
send. The headers are as c
What to do with a spam that includes this garbage at the bottom, in a hidden font?
Bayes freaked, I'm kinda glad it didn't auto-learn it. I'd rather have the false
negative than that. (Only snipped the Bayes poison from the mail, I think maybe
Mozilla TBird put all the = i
Look, there's a poll for this at
http://news.spamassassin.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=NS-Polls&file=index
Is it inappropriate to suggest that we see who's got the biggest thingy over there?
-tom
---
This sf.net
I've been able to re-discover pyzor servers (and it always winds up with the same
server) and get pyzor working for a couple hours before the "couldn't grok response
'...TimeoutErrors'" begins again. I've disabled Pyzor and just written it off to my
own ignorance. Basically once it starts not
It's the first option on the list if you type spamd --help
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Mangiafico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 1:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] spamd and -a option in 2.60?
>
> In the 2.60 docs, the -a "auto whitelis
What version of SpamAssassin? You can implement Razor, DCC, RBLs, and
train your Bayes up to 200 each of spam/ham to augment the tools at SA's
disposal.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: David M. Carney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 1:09 P
You need to either upgrade to 2.60 or remove your Osirusoft and orbs
tests tests as specified in the article at http://news.spamassassin.org.
Those blocklists are dead and are waiting until your timeout.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sen
So you're saying that when you cut and paste the body of a spam into an
email, removing the spammer's headers, SpamAssassin doesn't rate your
headers as spammy as the spammer's headers? And you include only the
spammy body, and it trips off all the spammy body checks? That's to be
expected, isn't
6 asterisks indicates it's not quite 7.0. Probably 6.9something. You
could add up the scores to verify if you really like, but that's what's
happening.
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=7.0 required=7.0
tests=BAYES_10,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED
Sounds like Postini. Or Messagelabs. postini dot com or messagelabs
dot com.
Messagelabs is using a modified SpamAssassin, iirc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Vanasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 5:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk
nce on the already-scanned mail. Perhaps during whatever adds that
funny X-UIDL header. Follow the path that the email's taking between
Internet and final destination, and you'll see the place where the
process breaks down.
It's difficult to see because you're not
Hi Doug,
The answer to your question varies depending on what version of
SpamAssassin you're using, and what RBL's you're seeing scores on. This
is crucial information to answering your question.
Since this is a well-documented issue with versions before 2.60, I'm
going to assume that, and that y
(I must be annoying SOMEBODY)
Hi Oz,
Which machine(s) have spamassassin? I know domini does, but does siena
also have spamassassin? That would cause this behavior.
-tom
- headers -
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 13:25, you wrote:
> It's difficult to see because yo
> -Original Message-
> From: O-Zone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wednesday 08 October 2003 13:40, Tom Meunier wrote:
> > (I must be annoying SOMEBODY) Hi Oz, Which
> > machine(s) have spamassassin? I know domini does, but does
> siena also
> > have
that were set up for the site, that might be a nice rule to add to the list.
tom
--
tom satter - just plain old tom
(303) 543-7623 (home)
Matt Kettler said:
> At 12:25 PM 10/9/2003, Eric Vollmer wrote:
>
>>My question is, what is the threshold for subject/body text like
>&
rough this list I found a reference to a test named
HTTP_ENTITIES_HOST
Yet, I don't see this in the current list of tests on the website. Has it been done
away with? If it has, why?
SA 2.55, Razor 2
--tom wentworth
--
Protect yourself f
How do you call SpamAssassin? Please be specific with your answer. :)
If you use spamc/spamd it defaults to only scanning up to 250kb,
configurable with the -s switch. No config file necessary, you set it
as a switch on the line that you call spamc with.
http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/spamc.ht
27;re seeing logged on as root is not
accurate for troubleshooting purposes.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Leonard III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 10:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Bayes not working.. On System
and that actually cut
my spam traffic by over 50% by itself, but again this stuff never gets
learned in Bayes.
Has anyone else juggled these questions?
-tom
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts ov
statistics output with evilrules.cf, as
I simply "blacklist_from *foo.tld" offending domains to my blacklist.cf
file.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Leonard III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 10:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
YPE_ONLY,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,
RCVD_IN_SBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS,T_AM_SPAMMY_SENDER,USER_IN_BLACKLIST,W_ROT13_B
_R
-tom
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 O
Well, it depends. If you run sa-learn and you're concerned that it's
not running, use the --showdots switch and it'll give you a progress
indicator. Just go ahead and sa-learn --ham a couple hundred hams real
quick, it'll start up from there. No further config necessary.
-
-H should list a directory other than the default home directory of the
user that's calling spamc. Else, don't use it at all.
-m5 should be -m 5 I believe.
Other than that, Idunno. Feel free to ignore me.
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phy with forged headers, likely to honor their promise to
unsubscribe your users?
-tom
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Leon Oosterwijk
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 8:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
> -Original Message-
>
> I'm Linux SysAdmin at the company I work for, I always
> install everything from source.
> A colleague, a Windows SysAdmin, installs everything on his
> Linux boxes from RPMs.
>
> What does that tell you? :)
>
Tells me we need a larger sample size. I'm a Wind
Train Bayes with sa-learn --ham using a sizable representative sample of the shipping
company's "known good" email.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Håkon Nilsen (Exinet AS)
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 6:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL P
That's right. It seems weird, doesn't it? But basically, that setting
tells SA that the filenames are /usr/local/share/bayes_*
To achieve what you think it should be, you'd want to do bayes_path
/usr/local/share/bayes/bayes - funny as that sounds.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL P
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
