> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 4:14 PM
> To: Andrew Cranson
> Cc: Cal Evans; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Delete vs tagging spam
>
>
> Here's the thing, though. SA is a *filter*. The MTA (or
> procmail,
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Barbeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] 7245 Habeas and counting
>
>
> I as well have gotten alot and want to set it to 0 and exlude
> it from bayes. So just to confirm
> Don't do that! You'll miss out on the HABEAS_VIOLATOR rule.
> Set it to -0.001 if you want, but don't kill it off.
> HABEAS_VIOLATOR is good for
> +16.
>
> A lot of people on this list need to calm down and stop over-reacting.
The HABEAS_VIOLATOR test is nice for those sites that also have
> It has been almost 24 hours since I received the last spam
> with Habeas
> headers. Possibly my ISP has added a filter to block the
> pharmacourt.biz
> spam before I see it ... Has anybody else noticed that their spam has
> stopped in the past day?
I thought I had noticed the same but wasn
> I have messages I am desperatly trying to whitelist from SA.
> I am using SpamAssassin on a Solaris 8 server using sendmail
> 8.12.10 and MIMEDefang.
>
> I have tried various lines in
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf to no avail:
>
>whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>whitelis
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 14:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matt Kettler
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] bayes
>
>
> I took a peek, and I guess my question is this.. How do I
> train on what
> is spam, if the spam has already be
All:
I think I saw an e-mail recently about the same problem I'm seeing with the
sa-stats.pl script. The script runs just fine, but all stats returned from
looking at /var/log/maillog are 0s.
Any ideas on what I might be doing wrong?
Essentially, I'm just calling sa-stats.pl as root from the co
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:18 AM
> To: Charles Gregory
> Cc: Justin Mason; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released!
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:12:46AM -0500, Charles Grego
All:
I just saw the strangest thing in my Yahoo! Mail bulk e-mail folder. It was
the usual collection of pornographic spams. But, there was one message that
really caught my eye. The subject line was:
*SPAM* The Beautiful Art of Female [snip]. xdvldmgzyohhmcn.
Oops. I sent my reply directly to Matt instead of the list...
-Joe
> -Original Message-
> From: Kang , Joseph S.
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 10:17 AM
> To: 'Matt Kettler'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Mysterious SA tags in SPAM message?
>
>
> &
> Sendmail is and MTA not a MDA. As far as I know, the MDA has
> to call spamassassin (or spamd). This is where I may be
> wrong, or maybe this is just the case with sendmail?
For clarification to the uninitiated:
MTA = Mail Transport Agent. Software used to TRANSFER e-mail messages
between ma
> From: Brian Sneddon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Do any good docs exist on using SpamAssassin with Sendmail as
> a gateway to an Exchange server? This is how I configured
> the spam filter we use here at work
> (Sendmail+SpamAssassin+spamass-milter) and if there aren't
> any good docs on
Man, I did it again! I meant to send this to the list and not solely to
Chris...
-Joe
> -Original Message-
> From: Kang , Joseph S.
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:20 AM
> To: 'Chris Santerre'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin and SendMail
>
> I think it's an issue of public vs private folders. I have an
> IMAP script that pulls the files from an SA account just
> fine. It was when I tried to use public folders that the
> problem arose.
> --
Interesting discussion all the way around...
I have an RH 7.3+ box running sendmail, pr
> -Original Message-
> From: Timothy Donahue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] sa-learn from Exchange 2000
>
> How can I process messages from our exchange server as spam?
> I have a whole bunch of messages
> -Original Message-
> From: Jody Cleveland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:21 PM
> To: 'David A. Carter'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Is sa-learn supposed to take over 2 hours?
>
> Ohh... So, I would want to run:
> # sa-learn -p /etc/MailSca
> -Original Message-
> From: Jody Cleveland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:29 PM
> To: 'Kang , Joseph S.'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Is sa-learn supposed to take over 2 hours?
>
>
> Cool. I tried that, and now, after sitti
> We're being hit by MS security update emails. I know they're
> not spam,
> but rather more accurately described as virii or worms.
>
> However, I'm wondering if anyone has a good rule that will mark these?
That's a good question. I got a few of those yesterday (day before?), too.
I was fre
Is someone SPAMming the SA-Talk list or did this message get sent
prematurely to the list??
-Joe K.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branch
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael H. Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:24 PM
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: [SAtalk] Yahoo, etc
>
>
> Sorta off topic, mebby, but:
>
> As good as SA is working here I have users that are
> constantly rem
> Any idea how a message with so many hits got such a low score?
Yes, this message had a Habeas mark in the header.
>
> X-Spam-Level: **
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61
> (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on anubis
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0
> tests=BAYES_99,BIZ_TLD,CLIC
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Exchange and autolearn
>
>
> Hi guys!
>
> I have a email gateway running spamassassin, amavisd-new and
> postfix. I am blocking a good chunk
> -Original Message-
> From: John Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 6:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Re: Exchange and autolearn
>
> I found that Exchange 2000 changed the headers too much and
> mime-encoded the body and so this approach
23 matches
Mail list logo
