Oops.  I sent my reply directly to Matt instead of the list...

-Joe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kang , Joseph S. 
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 10:17 AM
> To: 'Matt Kettler'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Mysterious SA tags in SPAM message?
> 
> 
> > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 10:15 AM
> > To: Kang , Joseph S.; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Mysterious SA tags in SPAM message?
> > 
> > 
> > At 10:53 AM 12/12/2003, Kang , Joseph S. wrote:
> > >=======================================================
> > >Anyone know how this could have happened?
> > >
> > >I'm just curious.  I've NEVER seen Yahoo! tagged bulk email with SA
> > >tags.
> > 
> > Odds are the open relay that the spammers sent the mail
> > through was running SA.
> > 
> > Yes, you'd think anyone using SA would check for open relay,
> > but it does 
> > happen.. I've gotten spam like this before.
> 
> Ah.  That's what I was starting to think as I typed up my 
> original message.
> 
> I agree.  It seems funny to do a check for SPAM and not do 
> any sort of check for open relay.  
> 
> -Joe
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to