But you can resolve it by having mailing list headers or white list the
sender.
I can't tell you how many psuedo opt-in emails that I have gotten (somewhere
in the 350+ megs worth).
-- Dennis
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:47:22PM -0800, Russ GilmanHunt wrote:
>
> Hey now.
> I can see using it in l
I'm saying it's not "unquestionably SPAM." Because I don't consider our
newsletter canned ham. However, if I suddenly got a weird reason to put
in a new header (X-Campaign, for instance, to track ... well I can't
think of a way to use one bi-monthly newsletter to one recipient list as
part of a "c
Hi
I have a setup with postfix, anomy, Vexira and SA.
The server does only filtering and forwarding to an internal exchange
server.
I have been asked to catch all mail from one certain external address and
send it both to the original recipient and another address.
I can't find a way to make pos
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1283
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-10 21:01 ---
Subject: Re: [SAdev] New: Unable To Email SpamAssassin.Org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mx1.reynolds.net.au[203.38.119.68] said:
550 5.0.0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've recently started using SA on a server with 5500+ users. At the moment
we are taking requests via email to modify the user_prefs file. I'm
wondering if a web application exists that will allow a user to log into
their account and modify the file themselves through a web browser as
telnet acces
Scot Wilcoxon said:
> > http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1283
FWIW, there are no addresses at SpamAssassin.org worth mailing.
Everyone lives elsewhere ;)
But I'll pass it on to the hoster...
--j.
---
This sf.net email i
This is probably a very stupid question. But where is this option
listed??? I looked in the docs for Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf and do not see
it.
Also where are all these rules I see people talking about. Are these
mimedefang rules???
I am running SA 2.43 and Spamass-milter with Sendmail 8.1
I thought I'd post a follow-up as to what my looping problems were. All problems
could be traced to postfix's master.cf file. In this file, I had fat-fingered two
entries which were causing postfix to re-evaluate the incoming mail and pass it off to
amavis over and over.
>From /etc/postfix/
> FWIW, there are no addresses at SpamAssassin.org worth mailing.
> Everyone lives elsewhere ;)
The "FAQ Owner" link on the FAQ page goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
perhaps it shouldn't?
--
Michael Moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/
"If the Phone Doesn't Ring, It's Me" --Ji
I was wondering if anyone knew where I could find a setup guide for
SpamAssassin and Sendmail or postfix. Running on a Redhat 8.0 server. The
would be a relay server that would forward the email to an exchange 2000
server. I did find the setup guide on Advosys site, But I was hoping to
find
At 04:50 AM 12/11/2002, admin wrote:
Hi
I have a setup with postfix, anomy, Vexira and SA.
The server does only filtering and forwarding to an internal exchange
server.
I have been asked to catch all mail from one certain external address and
send it both to the original recipient and another ad
I've put together a web interface that allows users to change the
required_hits, and add/delete blacklist_from, whitelist_from, and
whitelist_to directives. It's written in PHP, and requires that the
user_prefs file have group write permissions for the same group that
the web server runs as.
L
Is it possible for a file to be called into the local.cf file via an
'include' style statement? I have quite an extensive list of
whitelist_from that I would like to be able to pull in from an external
file.
Thanks -c
---
This sf.net email
I am definately interested in checking this out. Thanks.
--
Chris LaFrance
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Is sloppiness in speech caused by ignorance or apathy?
I don't know and I don't care."
-- William Safire
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Patrick Bores wrote:
> I've put together a web interface that al
man procmailex is your friend :)
In the user's home directory, make a file called ".procmailrc" (note the
dot). The contents of the file should look something like this:
:0 c
* ^From.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assuming your Postfix / Anomy / Vexira / SA also includes Procmail, thi
we have just implemented yesterday, spamassassin with using anomy sanitizer
as a relay box in front of our exchange server. I've gotten reports today
from a listserv owner that members have reported receiving "rejection"
notices about duplicated posts. from our SpamAssassin box. I haven't seen
any
Here's the PHP template I wrote for my small user base (slightly
modified for public consumption).
You'll have to write your own authentication code. All this template
really requires is that you set
the $user_dir variable.
Also, it assumes that the first line in the user_prefs file is the
"req
No need... From what I've read in the past SpamAssassin will actually parse
all files in /etc/mail/spamassassin, not just local.cf.
At 10:52 AM 12/11/2002 -0600, Charles Menzes wrote:
Is it possible for a file to be called into the local.cf file via an
'include' style statement? I have quite an
Me too!
Mark
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:59:43 -0500 (EST)
Chris LaFrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am definately interested in checking this out. Thanks.
>
> --
> Chris LaFrance
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Is sloppiness in speech caused by ignorance or apathy?
> I don't know and I d
Patrick: I would be very interested in this. Could you send me a tar
file or something with the bits?
On a related note, is there a way for me to provide per-user prefs for
user's whose mail is not actually delivered on my server but is
processed by SA? (Basically, I have several alises for fam
Mark,
I posted the file to the SATalk list. Hopefully it made it through
okay. If not, I"ll post a URL link.
Don't know about your second question. Sounds like one for the SA
developers.
Patrick
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 12:26 PM, Mark H. Granoff wrote:
Patrick: I would be very int
Hi,
I am running spamassassin sitewide for my company, using spamd/spamc
and sendmail. I think I have misunderstood something from the documentation:
"SpamAssassin is configured using some traditional UNIX-style
configuration files, loaded from the /usr/share/spamassassin and
/etc/mail/spamas
Matthew Boeckman wrote:
> I am running spamassassin sitewide for my company, using spamd/spamc
> and sendmail. I think I have misunderstood something from the
> documentation:
spamd compiles and stores the system-wide rules on start-up to speed up
processing. If you edit the local.cf file, you sh
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:26:04PM -0500, Mark H. Granoff wrote:
> On a related note, is there a way for me to provide per-user prefs for
> user's whose mail is not actually delivered on my server but is
> processed by SA? (Basically, I have several alises for family members
> that forward to th
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:49:28PM -0600, Matthew Boeckman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running spamassassin sitewide for my company, using spamd/spamc
> and sendmail. I think I have misunderstood something from the documentation:
>
> "SpamAssassin is configured using some traditional UNIX-style
Hi, trying to play with SA, looks like the config file is not working:
I am logged in as a regular user (not root), when run
spamassassin < myemail_file_with_full_header > out.msg
or
spamc -p port_number_of_spamd < input.msg > out.msg
The option specified in the user_prefs.template is not
Yes If you have a URL for this, please publish. That would
be great!!
Thanks
Jim
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Patrick Bores
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I posted the file to the SATalk list. Hopefully it made it
through
> okay. If not, I"ll post a URL link.
> Don't know about
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:50:02PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The option specified in the user_prefs.template is not taking effect. ( the copies
>in /user/local/share/ and ~myhome/.spamassassin are the same). Anyone knows why?
the filename is "user_prefs". the ".template" part just indica
So if I create the file with the right name (user_prefs) it should work? I just tried
but seems not working...
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:21 PM
To: Chen , Jun
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] user_pre
Hello,
How easy is it to upgrade from 2.01 to 2.43? Do I need to make substantion
config-changes? Is an upgrade even needed?
Thanks!
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx
--
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 03:29:24PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So if I create the file with the right name (user_prefs) it should work? I just
>tried but seems not working...
It should. ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"The Internet is like crack for smart people
>
> How easy is it to upgrade from 2.01 to 2.43? Do I need to make substantion
> config-changes? Is an upgrade even needed?
>
It's very easy. I did it not too long ago.. just did "install
Mail::SpamAssassin" from CPAN.
You might want to check the new manpage for spamd, as I think there were a
few
Ok found out more information. my relay box is delieverying to the To field
so that list servers and aliased accounts are delivered back to the To: and
the the Delivered-To: field.
anyone know how to correct this?
Bryan James
Armstrong Teasdale LLP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Bryan James <[EMAIL PRO
Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:26:04PM -0500, Mark H. Granoff wrote:
On a related note, is there a way for me to provide per-user prefs for
user's whose mail is not actually delivered on my server but is
processed by SA? (Basically, I have several alises for family members
t
Wanting to put together some webscripts to let users edit their SpamAssassin
preferences - and not wanting to reinvent the wheel - I found these packages
on the spamassassin site for setting user preferences via web forms:
http://spamassassin.org/devel/php-sa-mysql-0.5.tar.gz
http://spamassassi
Seen this blurb from today? I can't quite figure out
how I feel about it.
--Kurt
>From Infoworld's Technology and Business Daily:
> E-BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY REVIEW: TEST YOUR E-MAIL TEXT
>
> Considering the potential of e-mail communications (see
> above), it's a crying shame that the growing flo
Thanks... it works if I changed the one in my home directory. The one in
/usr/local/share is not installed yet. If it is, will this one takes precedence over
the one in my local directory?
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 03:55:15PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks... it works if I changed the one in my home directory. The one in
>/usr/local/share is not installed yet. If it is, will this one takes precedence over
>the one in my local directory?
Well, typically:
- there is the sha
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:42:26PM -0800, Kurt Andersen wrote:
> Seen this blurb from today? I can't quite figure out
> how I feel about it.
>
> --Kurt
>
> >From Infoworld's Technology and Business Daily:
>
> > E-BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY REVIEW: TEST YOUR E-MAIL TEXT
> >
> > Considering the potenti
Most likely the cause of your user_prefs not being parsed is a typo in the
file. When SA runs normally, it has no place to complain about invalid
input, so it just skips large chunks of the rules.You must turn on debug
output for it to be able to complain about such things.
Try:
spamassassin --
Fine by me.. they aren't using my baysien databases.. SA-2.50-cvs... I love
you. err umm.. yeah.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Kurt Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 12:42 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Anti-spam-assassination?
Seen thi
Thanks... BTW, when I ran this --lint, it returns 'unknow option: -'...
the reason my user_prefs not working was that I only have the user_prefs.template
file, not user_prefs.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 4:10 PM
To:
You can download the PHP template at:
http://patrick-cf.winternet.com/rules.php.txt
Remember, you must program your own authentication, and the user_prefs
file
must be writable by the group the web server runs as.
There isn't enough error checking to this effect yet, but it should be
workable.
Hmm.. if --lint doesn't work, what version of SA are you using? Sounds like
something from the 2.2x or 2.3x, but obviously older than 2.40...
If you're using an ancient version you'll have to feed it an email with -D
turned on.. it's got no "lint only" mode.
spamassassin -tD
I'd also advise u
OK, is there a tutorial so the ISP can enable user_rules without opening the
security hole mentioned in the below?
Greetings, I'm sorry, but upon further review of this we cannot turn on
user_prefs. From
http://www.cts.wustl.edu/cts/help/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
allow_user_rules { 0 | 1 } (de
Kurt Andersen said:
> Seen this blurb from today? I can't quite figure out
> how I feel about it.
yeah, me too. Both are SpamAssassin btw.
IMO, it's overall a good thing as
(a) it lets legit publishers avoid relatively-obvious trouble areas
(like talking about spam laws etc.)
(b) it lu
Victor O'Rear said:
> OK, is there a tutorial so the ISP can enable user_rules without opening the
> security hole mentioned in the below?
oops, hold on, I think I was advising the wrong thing altogether.
I previously said:
>Victor O'Rear said:
>> Spamd, by default, ignores user/.spamassassin/us
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:43:51PM -0800, Victor O'Rear wrote:
> OK, is there a tutorial so the ISP can enable user_rules without opening the
> security hole mentioned in the below?
>
> Greetings, I'm sorry, but upon further review of this we cannot turn on
> user_prefs. From
> http://www.cts.wu
>From the docs I quoted, enabling user_prefs allows users to run commands as
root.
I suspect that a form edited sql database would protect the system, but the
ISP is of the opinion that any access to user_prefs will compromise the
system so there will be no individual prefs. - Which makes spamassas
Victor O'Rear said:
> >>From the docs I quoted, enabling user_prefs allows users to run commands as
> root.
> I suspect that a form edited sql database would protect the system, but the
> ISP is of the opinion that any access to user_prefs will compromise the
> system so there will be no individua
> If not I was thinking of beginning to write my own,
> which leads me to this question Has anyone here
> used perl to verify md5 passwords? That probably
> belongs elsewhere but it's worth a shot.
>
> --
> Chris
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
i have already done this authentication scheme, for
Hi,
I thought I once saw a spamassasin .cf file with the "score" of a rule
inside the same file that defined it. Is this possible?
uri WWW_FREE-IREWARDS_COM /www.free-irewards.com/is
describe WWW_FREE-IREWARDS_COM they are spammers
score WWW_FREE-IREWARDS_COM 6
-- Gurujiwan
___
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:20:52AM +, Gurujiwan Khalsa wrote:
> I thought I once saw a spamassasin .cf file with the "score" of a rule
> inside the same file that defined it. Is this possible?
>
> uri WWW_FREE-IREWARDS_COM /www.free-irewards.com/is
> describe WWW_FREE-IREWARDS_COM the
Yes, that's the way most rules that users add themselves are done (ie: the
ones in local.cf and user_prefs files, instead of the SA-packaged files in
/usr/share/spamassassin)
Usually only the master /usr/share/spamassassin/*.cf files are set up with
a separate score file to facilitate the use o
You could set up a procmail recipe (global or user owned), or you could
set Postfix's option to blind copy all mail to a particular address.
Then, you just configure that user's .procmailrc to only accept mail from
tht address, and dump everything else.
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, admin wrote:
> Hi
55 matches
Mail list logo
