This is indeed so, you will need to hack the proram that calls spamd to
supply the correct username (or hack spamd). Since there is no way spamd can
know the 'real' adress this is delevered too.
I did a little hack on qmail-scanner for that purpose (really easy, one
SQL-Statement and case is close
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 11:16 pm, Rob MacGregor wrote:
> Some time back I browsed the list of tests so I could tweak the
> values to suit my own particular situation. Yesterday I did this
> again but noted that while some descriptions are in English, some are
> French and some are other langua
> You probably don't have to worry about them. Any rule definition
> begining with "lang xyz" will only be used if one of the language
> environmental variables is set to that language. SpamAssassin first
> looks in $LC_ALL, then $LANGUAGE, then $LC_MESSAGES, then $LANG, and
> assumes a language
From: "Michael Moncur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That's true, but he was probably referring to the "tests" page on the
Spamassassin web site, which has had some weird multilingual descriptions
for a while, not just for non-English rules. Here's a sample:
X-Mailer header indicates a non-spam MUA (Outloo
Hello,
Recently I have upgraded Mail-SpamAssassin from version 2.21 to 2.43.
Since then I noticed that tests which are marked on a message do not appear
in the X-Spam-Status header. This is very important for me.
Can anybody help me?
Thanks in advance.
--
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 18:35, Bob Amen wrote:
> Ian MacDougall wrote:
> > Well the idea came from the Linux Journal article a while back.
>
>
> Which issue was that?
Issue 92 see: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4882
> My problem with Perl as a mail server was not so muc
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 22:31, James Braid wrote:
> > I've put together a system using the Juniper smtpd+smtpfwdd daemons
> and
> > > spamd, with a bit of perl glue in between.
> >
> > On a Juniper box? that *is* cool! That'd be great to write up.
>
> I think he means this juniper: http://www.ob
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 23:32, Justin Mason wrote:
>
> James Braid said:
> > > > I've put together a system using the Juniper smtpd+smtpfwdd daemons
> > > > and > > > spamd, with a bit of perl glue in between.
> > >
> > > On a Juniper box? that *is* cool! That'd be great to write up.
> >
> > I t
I am getting spam with even a setting of 1 but only on certain types.
When I look at them they act like a header and a simple attachment
only. Is there anything I can do to stop those or have the spammers
found a huge loophole?
Thanks.
---
Th
| I am getting spam with even a setting of 1 but only on certain types.
| When I look at them they act like a header and a simple
| attachment only. Is there anything I can do to stop those or
| have the spammers found a huge loophole?
Don't know what setting you're referring to, but header
Hello,
Today I discovered a tagged e-mail with this SA-result.
Obviously, the negative score did not apply to the
sum. (It's a custom rule to avoid false positives).
What am I doing wrong here? This is SA 2.43 called via MIMEDefang
on a Linux Box with Perl 5.6.1
SPAM: Start
Hi,
I've got spamc/spamd 2.43 successfully running on one host.
However when I try to allow connections to spamd from one machine
on the network, it can not connect. Since I get no output from
spamd for the tries even with -D, I think the connections are
somehow blocked before reaching spamd. Or is
> "TK" == Tilman Kastner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TK> Obviously, the negative score did not apply to the
TK> sum. (It's a custom rule to avoid false positives).
Where did you learn arithmetic? ;-)
It adds up fine in my calculation. What score did you expect to get
from adding up all thos
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:30:03PM +0100, Martin Schroeder wrote:
> Hi,
> I've got spamc/spamd 2.43 successfully running on one host.
> However when I try to allow connections to spamd from one machine
> on the network, it can not connect. Since I get no output from
> spamd for the tries even with
Well, even in my calculation it was right :-)
But why gets a score of 3.6 tagged, if a score of 5 is required?
8.6 would have been...
Tilman
Am Mittwoch, 27.11.02 um 16:41 Uhr schrieb Vivek Khera:
"TK" == Tilman Kastner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TK> Obviously, the negative score did not appl
On 2002-11-27 16:30:03 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> somehow blocked before reaching spamd. Or is there something
> wrong with my configuration?
Yes. spamd was only listening on 127.0.0.1, not on the network.
Now spamc is looking for ~/.spamassasin/ on the host, not on the
client... :-(
Best r
Is it possible to use SA on a per user basis within qmail?
I know how to set up SA on a per domain basis, but not all users in the
domain I am setting up want spamassassin. Is there a way to call spamc
from a .qmail file within an individual user's directory?
If so, what is that command?
TIA
Hi guys,
I’ve just setup spamassassin on a red hat linux 8.0 box.
I currently have sendmail 8.12 and imapd running. I’m
able to get mail and send
I’ve also started spamd
Howeveer I’m pretty clueless on how to set up spamassin
to work in this environment
I’d like to set up a system wid
Here's the latest in nigerian scam mutations. This one only scored a 3.0
(SA 2.43).
Not only is the body quite different, the "plot" of the scam is
different as well.
Has anyone else seen a similar variation?
Thoughts on possible rules to catch this include:
/(Maryam|Sani) Abacha/i
/transfer o
Each user would put recipes in their ~/.procmailrc file to filter through
SA. Opting in/out would be as simple as using/not using the recipes. Here's
a basic example:
##
# SpamAssassin
##
:0fw
| spamc
:0:
* X-Spam-Status: Yes
$MAILDIR/Spam
###
I had
problems making the SA that came with redhat-8.0 work
properly.
I
removed the rpm and downloaded the source, followed the instructions like
a good little boy and now it works.
I
would recommend that as a first step.
I am
using sendmail 8.12/imaps
allowing users to opt in and
(whoops, forgot to include the list so 2 separate mails, one to Tilman, one
here)
You aren't using spamassassin -t when calling from mimedefang are you?
(note that -t, which is a test mode, always includes the body markup, even
in nonspam. You must use the headers to tell the difference in that
So now I have a question about this.
this poses an interesting solution to the problem Ive been asking about.
the ability to run one computer to handle spamd requests and possibly have three or
four machines passing the requests...
is there a way to make it use local per user prefs then...
if
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:24:05PM +0100, Tilman Kastner wrote:
> Obviously, the negative score did not apply to the
> sum. (It's a custom rule to avoid false positives).
>
> What am I doing wrong here? This is SA 2.43 called via MIMEDefang
> on a Linux Box with Perl 5.6.1
My theory is that you'r
> Here's the latest in nigerian scam mutations. This one only scored a 3.0
> (SA 2.43).
And yet another variation. At least it is different than the ones I
usually see.
Bob
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 27 08:30:48 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received
I just installed spamassasin and all the suggested/required modules on a
box running SPARC Solaris 8 and perl 5.8.0. SpamAssassin is working
fine on plain text messages and I get the added headers and can filter
them out using procmail, etc. The problem is in using Spam Assassin on
a HTML mail m
I'd advise that you not browse the descs on the website, look at the ones
that are in the .cf files themselves.
What happens is many rules have alternate descriptions in non-english
languages. The parser that crunches through the rules to create that
webpage winds up with different languages ba
They should be there, here's a sample one from spamassassin -t
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=18.4 required=5.5
tests=ALL_CAPS_HEADER,DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,DRASTIC_REDUCED,
FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,HOME_EMPLOYMENT,INVALID_DATE,
INVALID_MSGID,LINES_OF_YELLING,MSGID_HAS_NO_AT,
Am Mittwoch, 27. November 2002 18:39 schrieb Theo Van Dinter:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:24:05PM +0100, Tilman Kastner wrote:
> > Obviously, the negative score did not apply to the
> > sum. (It's a custom rule to avoid false positives).
> >
> > What am I doing wrong here? This is SA 2.43 called v
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Here's the latest in nigerian scam mutations. This one only scored a 3.0
> > (SA 2.43).
>
> And yet another variation. At least it is different than the ones I
> usually see.
I got one last week from a women who's father was the former Health
Minister of
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Michael Stenner wrote:
> >
> > > telnet 196.0.0.38 783
> > Trying 196.0.0.38...
> > telnet: connect to address 196.0.0.38: Connection refused
> >
>
> Have you checked your firewall (iptable/ipchains) rules? It could
> possibly be tcpwrappers (host.allow, ho
Did you make sure that you don't have any firewalls blocking access to
port 783/tcp?
First, make sure that if you're actually running a firewall (ipchains,
iptables?) on your spamd system, that you open up that port.
Second, on the spamd system, run "netstat -nap | grep 783" and see what IP
ad
Hi,
Just to report that it looks like a parameter is missing in the
INSTALL file for single user installation. I don't know if this was
mentioned in this mailing-list, but a quick search did not turn up
anything.
If one runs
perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=~/sausr SYSCONFDIR=~/saetc
make install may mi
BTW,
I figured I would post this here in order to help anyone else who
wanted to do this later on.
In order to use spamassassin on a per user basis with qmail and
vpopmail, you:
1. install Safecat
(http://www.nb.net/~lbudney/linux/software/safecat.html)
2. edit your mailbox's .qmail file to
Hey,
In my office there is a new mail server that I'm helping build, we're using
spamassassin along with some other virus scanners for server side checks.
I've been doing some testing with the new mail server and have been getting
a lot of the mail from the server saying it's spam when it's not ev
Steve Plemmons said:
> I just installed spamassasin and all the suggested/required modules on a
> box running SPARC Solaris 8 and perl 5.8.0. SpamAssassin is working
> fine on plain text messages and I get the added headers and can filter
> them out using procmail, etc. The problem is in using S
Simon Lyall said:
> I got one last week from a women who's father was the former Health
> Minister of Yugoslavia etc. Sorry I didn't save a copy.
hey, I saw one supposedly from the head of Barclays Bank in the UK ;)
Now I know the economic situation over there isn't great, but it's
not *that* bad
Matt Kettler said:
> I'd advise that you not browse the descs on the website, look at the ones
> that are in the .cf files themselves.
>
> What happens is many rules have alternate descriptions in non-english
> languages. The parser that crunches through the rules to create that
> webpage wind
Hiya All,
Can somebody please provide me with a how-to, example or URL
of a sendmail configuration (.mc file) with procmail support for
a site wide SpamAssassin installation.
I have a sitewide installation of SpamAssassin using spamd/spamc
and a MySQL database for preferences. However when
my sen
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:24:05PM +0100, Tilman Kastner wrote:
> What am I doing wrong here? This is SA 2.43 called via
> MIMEDefang on a Linux Box with Perl 5.6.1
The shell scripts spamc and spamassassin are not run by
MIMEDefang. Instead, a function named spam_assassin_check()
is called. It is
40 matches
Mail list logo
