Re: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-08 Thread Bill Campbell
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 09:38:10PM -0500, dempsey wrote: >Sorry for being ignorant but what is the term LDA? My guess is Local Delivery Agent (e.g. procmail, deliver, ...). The term I've usually seen though is MDA (Mail Delivery Agent). >-Original Message- >From: Olivier Nicole [mailto:[

RE: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-08 Thread dempsey
Matt, Thanks. I need some quick down and dirty help. I looked at that and it didn't quiet work for me. Let me describe what I am doing to see if maybe you know a way I can do this. I am using qmail 1.03 on redhat 7.2 with qmail-scanner/spamassassin. I have procmail 3.21. The procmail I am

RE: [SAtalk] How SpamAssassin works & load testing

2002-06-08 Thread Michael Moncur
> % I tried to grab that spam tarball but it gave me permissions > denied. I'd > % like to try using it if you can set the permissions. > > My bad; even though I opened perms on the file I forgot that the symlink > had to go through $HOME/Mail at mode 0700. I made it a hard link and it > works

Re: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-08 Thread Bob Proulx
SpamAssassin catagorizes messages, Procmail files messages. This is what I have in my .procmailrc file to file the spam that spamassassin has tagged. :0fw | spamassassin -P :0e { EXITCODE=$? } :0: * ^X-Spam-Flag: YES caughtspam Bob

RE: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-08 Thread Olivier Nicole
> what is the term LDA? My fault, I didn't knew like 3 month ago. Local Delivery Agent, the piece of code that gets a message from your SMTP server and (after some ossible filtering) put it in users mailbox. Procmail is an LDA Olivier

Re: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-08 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 09:38:10PM -0500, dempsey wrote: | Sorry for being ignorant but what is the term LDA? Local Delivery Agent. The thing that puts the message into a "folder". -D -- "640K ought to be enough for anybody" -Bill Gates, 1981 GnuPG key : http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/public_k

Re: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-08 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 04:21:35PM -0500, dempsey wrote: | I guess short and sweet, I need to know: | | 1. What do I put in my .qmail file to invoke procmail. Ask this on a qmail list. I use exim and can tell you how to plug SA into exim, but I've never touched qmail. Right now your only prob

[SAtalk] Ammusingly misconfigured spam software

2002-06-08 Thread Matthew Cline
Just got some spam with the subject "Approved for $5000...For $user only", and in the body "Your approval is finally here $user" "$user". Boy, it makes me feel so special, how they pernsolize the message with my name and all... -- Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute, but s

Re: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-08 Thread Olivier Nicole
> My guess is Local Delivery Agent (e.g. procmail, deliver, ...). > The term I've usually seen though is MDA (Mail Delivery Agent). Very true, I should have used MDA, I think I used LDA because they use it on procmail list. Olivier ___

RE: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-08 Thread dempsey
I got the whole enchilada working now. Good bye spam! BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Olivier Nicole Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 9:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Finally got it working... > My guess

Re: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-08 Thread Bryan Hoover
dempsey wrote: > I got the whole enchilada working now. Good bye spam! > BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Ahh, a great feeling isn't it? If you havn't already, install Razor - http://razor.sourceforge.net - and feel good about reporting the ones that slip through. Bryan -- [Please don't CC me when list posti

Re: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-08 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 11:38:07PM -0400, Bryan Hoover wrote: | dempsey wrote: | | > I got the whole enchilada working now. Good bye spam! | > BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! | | Ahh, a great feeling isn't it? If you havn't already, install Razor - | http://razor.sourceforge.net - and feel good about reporti

Re: [SAtalk] bible-thumping checks in SA?

2002-06-08 Thread bhoover
___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing

Re: [SAtalk] bible-thumping checks in SA?

2002-06-08 Thread Bryan Hoover
[Sorry, I accidentally sent a blank response to this a moment ago.] Vaclav Barta wrote: > I probably wasn't very clear, but I meant a *concrete* biblical > chapter > and verse, not the literal string... It might be more effective to worry more about the *non*-chapter and verse Bible thumpers.

Re: [SAtalk] bible-thumping checks in SA?

2002-06-08 Thread Vaclav Barta
Geoff Gibbs wrote: > Vaclav Barta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked about religious spam > including : > > - chapter & verse I probably wasn't very clear, but I meant a *concrete* biblical chapter and verse, not the literal string... > > - the bible > The Bible is one of the (if not THE) major sources

RE: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-08 Thread dempsey
I am not adding anything else for now. I recently have added qmail, procmail, spamassassin, and qmail-scanner. I didn't realize what I had bitten into when I decided to go the spamassassin route. I just need to learn what I have. Plus, I am not killing spam the way the designers had in mind. I fin

Re: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-08 Thread Bryan Hoover
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > Razor isn't that good. Last week sometime, someone was > auto-reporting all messages to exim-users. The listmaster did come up > > with a nice and creative way to identify who the luser was :-). If it > > weren't for things like that I might actually use it. Ind

Re: [SAtalk] Finally got it working...

2002-06-08 Thread Bryan Hoover
dempsey wrote: > I am not adding anything else for now. I recently have added qmail, > procmail, spamassassin, and qmail-scanner. I didn't realize what I had > > bitten into when I decided to go the spamassassin route. I just need > to Fortunately, my ISP already had everything SA needed, so I j

Re: [SAtalk] Ammusingly misconfigured spam software

2002-06-08 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 10:49:34PM -0700, Matthew Cline wrote: > Just got some spam with the subject "Approved for $5000...For $user only", > and in the body "Your approval is finally here $user" > > "$user". Boy, it makes me feel so special, how they pernsolize the message > with my name

Re: [SAtalk] Ammusingly misconfigured spam software

2002-06-08 Thread Bryan Hoover
Duncan Findlay wrote: > > Just got some spam with the subject "Approved for $5000...For $user > only", > > and in the body "Your approval is finally here $user" > > > > "$user". Boy, it makes me feel so special, how they pernsolize the > message > > with my name and all... > > > > Eww... Per

Re: [SAtalk] Ammusingly misconfigured spam software

2002-06-08 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 01:46:14AM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 10:49:34PM -0700, Matthew Cline wrote: > > > Just got some spam with the subject "Approved for $5000...For > > $user only", and in the body "Your approval is finally here > > $user" > > > > "$user". Boy

Re: [SAtalk] Ammusingly misconfigured spam software

2002-06-08 Thread Jay Davis
On Sunday 09 June 2002 12:46 am, Duncan Findlay wrote: > > "$user". Boy, it makes me feel so special, how they pernsolize the > > message with my name and all... > > Eww... Perl (mis)used for evil. I thought spammers were generally of > the VB/VC++/Win32 crowd. Maybe it's a dumber than usual VB