Re: [SAtalk] server load increases with spamassassin

2003-07-09 Thread Simon Byrnand
At 23:38 8/07/03 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: At 01:16 PM 7/9/03 +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote: > hi to all, > > I'm still having an unresolve problem with my Email server having > spamassassin. My server load increases when it scans less than a hundred > of > emails in transit. I'm running spamassas

Re: [SAtalk] server load increases with spamassassin

2003-07-09 Thread Matt Kettler
At 12:51 PM 7/9/03 +0800, Michael P. Carel wrote: thanks for the reply. What I also observed was, when a user used to send an email using pine mailer, which has a group addressbook, and used to send email to all that goup(which has a large list of email addresses) by including it all to CC: the se

Re: [SAtalk] server load increases with spamassassin

2003-07-08 Thread Michael P. Carel
> Questions: > you stated the load went up after "only 100 messages".. 100 messages in > what timeframe? 1 hour? 1 second? > > Suggestions: > > 1) really whatever is calling spamc should be using some kind of mechanism > to limit the number of spamc's it calls. If xamime is calling out 20 > spamc's

Re: [SAtalk] server load increases with spamassassin

2003-07-08 Thread Matt Kettler
At 01:16 PM 7/9/03 +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote: > hi to all, > > I'm still having an unresolve problem with my Email server having > spamassassin. My server load increases when it scans less than a hundred > of > emails in transit. I'm running spamassassin daemon. > > Any idea why? Please help us

Re: [SAtalk] server load increases with spamassassin

2003-07-08 Thread Michael P. Carel
> > hi to all, > > > > I'm still having an unresolve problem with my Email server having > > spamassassin. My server load increases when it scans less than a hundred > > of > > emails in transit. I'm running spamassassin daemon. > > > > Any idea why? Please help us. > > Well naturally SpamAssassi

Re: [SAtalk] server load increases with spamassassin

2003-07-08 Thread Simon Byrnand
> hi to all, > > I'm still having an unresolve problem with my Email server having > spamassassin. My server load increases when it scans less than a hundred > of > emails in transit. I'm running spamassassin daemon. > > Any idea why? Please help us. Well naturally SpamAssassin is going to increa

Re: [SAtalk] Server Load Average Increasing in Redhad 7.3

2003-06-22 Thread Michael P. Carel
> > I've installed spamassassin 2.54 in redhat 7.3 with a machine specs > > of Intel PII 350MHz 128MB, there are times that my server loads > > abnormally increases when spamassassin daemon scanning emails. I used > > to restart the daemon process and the server load back to normal > > again. > >

Re: [SAtalk] Server Load Average Increasing in Redhad 7.3

2003-06-20 Thread Simon Byrnand
> hi to all, > > I've installed spamassassin 2.54 in redhat 7.3 with a machine specs of > Intel > PII 350MHz 128MB, there are trimes that my server loads abnormally > increases > when .you try to post a message to the spamassassin list ? ;-) Try leaving 'vmstat 5' running in a window and see

Re: [SAtalk] Server Load Average Increasing in Redhad 7.3

2003-06-20 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Michael P. Carel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I've installed spamassassin 2.54 in redhat 7.3 with a machine specs > of Intel PII 350MHz 128MB, there are times that my server loads > abnormally increases when spamassassin daemon scanning emails. I used > to restart the daemon process and the server lo

Re: [SAtalk] Server Load Average Increasing in Redhad 7.3

2003-06-19 Thread Michael P. Carel
hi to all, I've installed spamassassin 2.54 in redhat 7.3 with a machine specs of Intel PII 350MHz 128MB, there are times that my server loads abnormally increases when spamassassin daemon scanning emails. I used to restart the daemon process and the server load back to normal again. Any idea

RE: [SAtalk] Server Load

2002-11-20 Thread Clayton, Nik [IT]
> I think you're going to run into problems. I would suggest you think > about adding three more of those boxes, maybe more. As a reference, 4 880s with 2 CPUs and 4GB of RAM are currently handling ~ 2.2 million messages a day (in conjunction with MIMEDefang) without breaking in to a serious swe

Re: [SAtalk] Server Load

2002-11-19 Thread Keith Olmstead
Yeah testing will be done pretty heavily before put into production. Also this product might not work under our load. That is where the testing comes in. I was courious to see what type of load I could expect, it does not look good from what I am hearing. I am still in the planning stage of thi

Re: [SAtalk] Server Load

2002-11-19 Thread Matt Sergeant
Keith Olmstead said the following on 19/11/02 16:11: Hello, A quick question. After doing some reading, I noticed alot ppl have SA running on Intel boxes. Is anyone running SA on Solaris boxes? Will be processing about 600k emails/day on one mail server and was wondering how it would fair. It

Re: [SAtalk] Server Load

2002-11-19 Thread Jeff Engelhardt
Keith Olmstead wrote: Hello, A quick question. After doing some reading, I noticed alot ppl have SA running on Intel boxes. Is anyone running SA on Solaris boxes? Will be processing about 600k emails/day on one mail server and was wondering how it would fair. It is a Sun V880 with dual 700 sp