> From: "Rose, Bobby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I think it's also a matter of perception. In the case of a milter, you
> still have only one sendmail process handling incoming mail so a the
> backed up queues are still happening just on someone elses system while
> the milter returns back to sendmai
bject: Re: [SAtalk] MailScanner vs Milter installation
On Wednesday, Oct 23, 2002, at 14:22 US/Pacific,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> mailscanner started to choke whenever loads of e-mail came in.
Sounds like my servers. Any time we get a big chunk of messages come
in, I have to worry about
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, John Rudd wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, Oct 23, 2002, at 14:22 US/Pacific,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > mailscanner started to choke whenever loads of e-mail came in.
>
> Sounds like my servers. Any time we get a big chunk of messages come
> in, I have to worry about whether o
On Wednesday, Oct 23, 2002, at 14:22 US/Pacific,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mailscanner started to choke whenever loads of e-mail came in.
Sounds like my servers. Any time we get a big chunk of messages come
in, I have to worry about whether or not Mailscanner will keep up. I
also sort of do
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Kevin J. Steil wrote:
> Also, which will perform better...using mailscanner or a milter in
> sendmail??
>
> This is an enterprise SMTP Gateway...going to be passing about 10K to
> 20k message per day.
>
I've used both mailscanner and mimedefang, and mimedefang (a milter) is
D
