>On 3 Apr 2002 the voices made Craig Hughes write:
>
>> Besides, you might be a spammer in disguise, and giving you my
>>address would lead to Guido and his boys showing up one morning
>>for my kneecaps.
>
> I was about to make a joke in a "who wants to go to [city from
>whois-lookup] just to..."
At 09:40 AM 4/4/2002 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 05:23, Olivier Nicole wrote:
>
> > BTW, a serious question. Do you any of you know if on a Cisco router
> > it is possible to do transparent redirection for SMTP?
>
>Yes - you use policy routing. You need a box to accept
> That's what I was afraid of. I don't think the magic is *that* deep, at
> least in linux 2.4, you should be able to just read the NAT table to
> figure out what X was trying to talk to in the first place. But I was
> just wondering if there was some more elegant way of doing it.
I beleive tha
>See, but I don't want to store-and-forward. I want to just pass what X
>says on to Z, then listen to what Z says, and pass that back to X.
It's possible too, I was misslead when you use the word redirection.
It could be your router (provided it is based on a Unix box (or
Windows box :)) or an
I'm not talking about putting this in the network path of an ISP, I'm
talking about an appliance for home use, where grandma can just plug it
in between her PC and her cable modem and magically get no more spam.
C
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 03:18, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 12:
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 12:13, Craig Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 01:50, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> > I've not played with this since a 2.0 linux kernel, however on that if
> > you have the transparent proxy code in place - which *terminates* the
> > connection (so X thinks its talking to
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 01:50, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> I've not played with this since a 2.0 linux kernel, however on that if
> you have the transparent proxy code in place - which *terminates* the
> connection (so X thinks its talking to Z but is actually talking to Y -
> if you want Z involved
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 01:40, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > So X connects to what it thinks is Z, but is really Y. Now what I want
> > to do is have Y open a connection on to Z, and transparently monitor the
>
> Y would not "monitor the traffic" but really act impersonnate Z when
> it talks to X and
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 10:29, Craig Hughes wrote:
> So, I understand how I can redirect any traffic from X on port 25 to Y.
> But how do I get Y to know the address that X intended to connect to in
> the first place, so it can open the onward connection? I suppose if Y
> was itself the router, th
> So X connects to what it thinks is Z, but is really Y. Now what I want
> to do is have Y open a connection on to Z, and transparently monitor the
Y would not "monitor the traffic" but really act impersonnate Z when
it talks to X and impersonnate X when it talks to Z.
But if you don't care one
I have a question; I've run into this particular one myself before in
trying to do transparent proxying. Let's say you have client X trying
to connect to server Z, and you want to transparently proxy the TCP
connection through Y, which happens to know the protocol Z speaks. In
this instance, we'
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 05:23, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> BTW, a serious question. Do you any of you know if on a Cisco router
> it is possible to do transparent redirection for SMTP?
Yes - you use policy routing. You need a box to accept the SMTP
sessions as the next hop - we (when I worked at Pla
Don't need your address, but how about your Amazon or CDnow (or
elsewhere) wishlist?
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 15:43, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Wow, money and pizza! I've been offered beer before too :)
>
> Seriously though, we're happy you like using it. And we're in it for
> the love and satisfacti
> This is possible when using iptables on a Linux 2.4 router. (The code
> to emulate the expected delays, remote system prompts, etc. is left
> as an exersize for the reader.)
Yes, that I know, but the border routers are Cisco (talking about a
big ISP) and the most valid point to do redirection
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>BTW, a serious question. Do you any of you know if on a Cisco router
>it is possible to do transparent redirection for SMTP?
This is possible when using iptables on a Linux 2.4 router. (The code
to emulate the expected delays, remote syst
> Thailand and China ;) Sometimes Korea.
:PPP
BTW, a serious question. Do you any of you know if on a Cisco router
it is possible to do transparent redirection for SMTP?
Idea, at ISP side, would be for know spamer, to transparently redirect
their outgoing mail traffic, so it can be checked and
Thailand and China ;) Sometimes Korea.
C
PS Just kidding Olivier
On Wednesday, April 3, 2002, at 05:53 PM, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> On 3 Apr 2002 the voices made Craig Hughes write:
>
>> Besides, you might be a spammer in disguise, and giving you my address
>> would lead to Guido and his bo
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 the voices made Duncan Findlay write:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:53:56AM +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> > On 3 Apr 2002 the voices made Craig Hughes write:
> >
> > > Besides, you might be a spammer in disguise, and giving you my address
> > > would lead to Guido and his bo
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:53:56AM +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> On 3 Apr 2002 the voices made Craig Hughes write:
>
> > Besides, you might be a spammer in disguise, and giving you my address
> > would lead to Guido and his boys showing up one morning for my kneecaps.
>
> I was about to mak
On 3 Apr 2002 the voices made Craig Hughes write:
> Besides, you might be a spammer in disguise, and giving you my address
> would lead to Guido and his boys showing up one morning for my kneecaps.
I was about to make a joke in a "who wants to go to [city from whois-lookup]
just to..." when a s
Wow, money and pizza! I've been offered beer before too :)
Seriously though, we're happy you like using it. And we're in it for
the love and satisfaction, not the pizza and money :)
Besides, you might be a spammer in disguise, and giving you my address
would lead to Guido and his boys showing
21 matches
Mail list logo
