On Dec 4, 2003 at 17:14, Damian Gerow wrote:
>Yes, a spammer would need high availability. But so does Microsoft, Apple,
>CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation), etc. Again, just because an image
>is hosted by Akamai doesn't even mean that Akamai is aware of this -- it
>just means that someone
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, jenni baier wrote:
> For example, I get a few "Stock Pick" spams that reference legitimate
> quote sites... they don't necessarily want you to respond directly to
> them, they just want you to buy their stock.
The answer, in this case, is to isolate the portion of the
I can see how using image references could be problematic... just because
an image is referenced, it doesn't mean the spammer controls it.
Personally, for my home grown additions to the evil list, I've been adding
only the domains or IPs that the spammer wants me to click on... but even
this c
OK. I'm hoping this is it for a week. I'm away from email after tomorrow.
People checking here for me have been informed to "No touchy!" my project :)
1.59 is up.
The 3 below, plus xmr3.com have been moved to a seperate rule for watching.
I will add more domains as they are found to be both SPAM
Thus spake Chris Santerre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [04/12/03 16:48]:
> That is the problem we are now facing. Would a spammer need high volume web
> access? My corpa says yes. I obviously can't tag this now. I removed the
> first 2, but I have left bfast.com and xmr3.com in for now. I may remove
> tomor
gt; From: Fritz Mesedilla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:07 PM
> To: Chris Santerre; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>
>
>
> I was getting quite "envious" of you people seeing the
> bigevil list
Santerre; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
I was getting quite "envious" of you people seeing the bigevil list working.
Now I got my first bigevil catch:
Content analysis details: (9.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name d
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> OK I have issues:
>
> > promotion.entertainment.com (70)
> > a1524.g.akmaitech.net (82)
> > and service.bfast.com (150)
>
> Up until now, no one has really done anything with hosts. This is kind
> of the first instance where it will make a large impact
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:38:29PM -0600, Mark Muller wrote:
> Because I've never opted into anything, yet I get spam with images hosted on
> akamaitech/akamai.
>
> Perhaps hate was a strong word, I dislike them very much? :) The fact that
> it found it's way into evil rules (in 3 separate places
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Rosenman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:30 PM
> To: Bart Schaefer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>
>
>
>
> --On Thursday, December 04, 200
-Original Message-
From: Larry Rosenman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Bart Schaefer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
--On Thursday, December 04, 2003 13:26:27 -0800 Bart Schaefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
--On Thursday, December 04, 2003 13:26:27 -0800 Bart Schaefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Mark Muller wrote:
promotion.entertainment.com (70)
a1524.g.akmaitech.net (82)
and service.bfast.com (150)
Personally, I'll be whitelisting ticketmaster rather than removing
akmaitech :
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Mark Muller wrote:
> promotion.entertainment.com (70)
> a1524.g.akmaitech.net (82)
> and service.bfast.com (150)
>
> Personally, I'll be whitelisting ticketmaster rather than removing
> akmaitech :P I hate those guys.
I presume you mean "akamaitech". What have you got agains
At 19:13 12/3/2003 -0600, mikea wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:17:28PM -0500, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Peter P. Benac wrote:
>
> > I have been using Emacs for almost 20 years. Is there any other
editor :)
> >
> > :s/old stuff/newstuff/g only works if you only have one instance of
"old
> >
To throw oil into the flames:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:10:17PM -0500, Carl R. Friend wrote:
>"Why are we hiding from the police, daddy?"
>
>"Because we use vi, son, and they use emacs."
Why not use 'vim' (multi window / multi file / macrolanguage / ... )
All luxuries included, and no n
> -Original Message-
> From: Colin A. Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:30 AM
> To: Chris Santerre; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>
*snip*
>
> As always, Chris. Thanks.
:-)
> Wh
| From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:29 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
|
| Nice list. I have two recommendations/suggestions:
|
| 1) put the full URL of the canonical source into the file itse
Helleau all
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mikea
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 8:14 PM
> To: 'SA List'
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>
> On Wed, Dec
These rules freakin' rock! I just tested them against my corpus of mail
that SA didn't catch before (which is pretty effective at 90-97% catch
rate: SA 2.6 with a well trained Bayes DB) and it caught 90 out of 108!
Nice work!
Thanks very much for your hard work!
Rubin
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 07:5
2003-12-02 kl. 21.56 skrev Chris Santerre:
BIG HUGE NEWS
A major breakthrough has taken place
ALL EVILRULES FILES HAVE BEEN COMBINED!! 2622 domains into 178 rules!!!
Ramdon/tracking hosts tags removed!
They only increase spamd memory by 1 meg!!! 1 meg!
You read correctly! Every ev
> What if we were to setup some kind of automatic update script
> that would wget the latest version of the file every evening?
> That way we would all be up to date all the time. To that
> end, we could even setup a little web-based app whereby a
> coalition of we vigilantes could add spammy
Bill Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:55 AM
> > What if we were to setup some kind of automatic update script
> > that would wget the latest version of the file every evening?
> > That way we would all be up to date all the time. To that
> > end, we could even setup a little web-based app where
Chris Santerre Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 3:49 PM
> Done and Done and Will do :)
>
> Yes I even put the time. No need to update if you have 1.57, as these were
> just info changes. I'm sure 1.58 could be lurking just around the corner.
> I'm just waiting for the next "Matt" email to come i
Vivek Khera'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
Done and Done and Will do :)
Yes I even put the time. No need to update if you have 1.57, as these were
just info changes. I'm sure 1.58 could be lurking just around the corner.
I'm just waiting for t
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:17:28PM -0500, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Peter P. Benac wrote:
>
> > I have been using Emacs for almost 20 years. Is there any other editor :)
> >
> > :s/old stuff/newstuff/g only works if you only have one instance of "old
> > stuff" per line!!
>
> H?
>
> What
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Scott Harris wrote:
> Ahh, the great editor debate :-)
"Why are we hiding from the police, daddy?"
"Because we use vi, son, and they use emacs."
Disclaimer: The above is not my creation. I pilfered it from
somewhere. I forget where. I wasn't even there. You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Rick Macdougall
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:17 PM
> To: 'SA List'
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>
> Peter P. Benac wrot
Peter P. Benac wrote:
I have been using Emacs for almost 20 years. Is there any other editor :)
:s/old stuff/newstuff/g only works if you only have one instance of "old
stuff" per line!!
H?
What you talking about Willis?
:s/old stuff/newstuff/g will replace ALL instances of old stuff wi
ginal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Adam Lanier
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 14:36
> To: SA List
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>
>
> On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 14:25, Chris Thielen wrote:
>
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 8:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
> 1) put the full URL of the canonical source into the file itself, so
>people know from where to get updates
Or, for those who like a little automation:
#!/bin/sh
> 1) put the full URL of the canonical source into the file itself, so
>people know from where to get updates
Or, for those who like a little automation:
#!/bin/sh
wget -N http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/bigevil.cf \
-O /etc/mail/spamassassin/bigevil.cf \
2>&1 | gr
On Dec 3, 2003 at 12:43, Jennifer Wheeler wrote:
>You should grab multiedit. Rockage. You can do your edits with little
>macros.
Perl! sed! Makefiles!
--
Satya. http://www.thesatya.com/>
The lab called: your brain is ready
---
This SF.net
e has been quiet.too quiet :)
--Chris (I top post in your general direction) Santerre
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 3:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL
--On Wednesday, December 03, 2003 15:29:05 -0500 Vivek Khera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice list. I have two recommendations/suggestions:
1) put the full URL of the canonical source into the file itself, so
people know from where to get updates
2) put a date into the file, so people will
Nice list. I have two recommendations/suggestions:
1) put the full URL of the canonical source into the file itself, so
people know from where to get updates
2) put a date into the file, so people will know how "fresh" the info
is.
And add "china-inflatable.com" and "cn-inflatables.com" ;
Shhh1.57:)
Sorry. But there are a few things. 100% spam rate is the goal. So any chance
of FP can't happen. I removed the domain with the tomshardware fp in it.
Also Matt Yackley, (What is it with Matts straightening me out!), has shown
me an error in my ways. With such wide use of this
Matthew Daubenspeck said:
> I am trying to test out these new rules, but so far all of my tests have
> not showing them as being active.
>
> $ ls /etc/mail/spamassassin
> bigevil.cf local.cf
>
> And I restarted spamd... What else do I have to do to make them work?
Matthew,
I'd make sure your conf
--On Wednesday, December 03, 2003 14:31:27 -0500 Matthew Daubenspeck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to test out these new rules, but so far all of my tests have
not showing them as being active.
$ ls /etc/mail/spamassassin
bigevil.cf local.cf
And I restarted spamd... What else do I hav
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 14:25, Chris Thielen wrote:
> Did somebody mention editor wars? C'mon let's hear from you Emacs people ;)
emacs rocks
alt-% for search/replace or
ctrl-alt-% for regex search/replace
--
Adam Lanier
Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
212.230.2491
signature.asc
Desc
I am trying to test out these new rules, but so far all of my tests have
not showing them as being active.
$ ls /etc/mail/spamassassin
bigevil.cf local.cf
And I restarted spamd... What else do I have to do to make them work?
Thanks for the help.
--
:wq!
Matthew Daubenspeck
http://www.odd
Scott Harris said:
> Doesn't anyone use VI anymore?!! :-)
> Sorry, couldn't resist adding to the war.
>
> :%s/old stuff/new stuff/g
Or even better:
:g/^score/s/3.0/1.0/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Survey.
Help shape
Jennifer Wheeler said:
>
>> You could always lower the score. Only 178 to change :)
>> (Hey that is nothing compared to how many times I had to hit ' | ,
> DELETE,
>> END ' because I was in a hurry to get done!)
>
> Hi Chris,
> You should grab multiedit. Rockage. You can do your edits with littl
lk (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
Not to start a text editor war, but it can be done in Textpad with a regex
search and replace. Hit F8, check the Regular Expression textbox
-> Find: \t3.0$ -> Replace with: \t1.0 (or whatever you want the score
to be).
Mike
> --
]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jennifer Wheeler
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:43 PM
> To: 'Chris Santerre'; 'Adam Denenberg'; 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>
>
>
> &g
nifer
>
> --Chris Santerre
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:57 AM
> > To: 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
> > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE
sage-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:32 AM
> > > To: Chris Santerre
> > > Cc: 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
> > > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>
l)
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>
>
>
> How can I tell that SA is actually using these rules (located
> in /etc/mail/spamassassin/bigevil.cf) ?
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This SF.net e
erre
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:57 AM
> To: 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>
>
> how agressive are these rules? I am hearing
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:48:03AM -0500, Vee Persaud wrote:
>
> How can I tell that SA is actually using these rules (located in
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/bigevil.cf) ?
Feed your MTA a mail designed to match one or more of the rules, and
look for the match in your logs.
Watch for hits? It shouldn't take long, those rules hit about 1 in 5 for
me.
-Original Message-
From: Vee Persaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
How can I tell
How can I tell that SA is actually using these rules (located in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bigevil.cf) ?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Survey.
Help shape OSDN's sites and tell us what you think. Take this
five minute su
.Hm... :)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:32 AM
> > To: Chris Santerre
> > Cc: 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> On 2003/12/03 09:31:24 -0500, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>> What version of Bigevil do you have? 1.51 has fixed 2 typos in 141
>> and 153.
>> I had
>> '.com||somedome'
>>
>> empty pipes. site updated within minutes. You got version 1.5 I
>> expect :)
>>
>
> The first few lin
latest is 1.52. Fixed 2 typos and 3 domains. An SF
project..Hm... :)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:32 AM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
> Su
On 2003/12/03 09:31:24 -0500, Chris Santerre wrote:
> What version of Bigevil do you have? 1.51 has fixed 2 typos in 141 and 153.
> I had
> '.com||somedome'
>
> empty pipes. site updated within minutes. You got version 1.5 I expect :)
>
The first few lines of:
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/
2003-12-02 kl. 21.56 skrev Chris Santerre:
BIG HUGE NEWS
A major breakthrough has taken place
ALL EVILRULES FILES HAVE BEEN COMBINED!! 2622 domains into 178 rules!!!
Ramdon/tracking hosts tags removed!
They only increase spamd memory by 1 meg!!! 1 meg!
You read correctly! Every evil
Chris Santerre said:
> That domain got there from an SA post. SA list was CC'd instead of To:'d.
> So
> It got filtered :/
Chris,
Instead of checking To or CC, you might want to look for headers the list
software adds:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg25589.html
--
Chris Thielen
>
> (...)
> > ALL EVILRULES FILES HAVE BEEN COMBINED!! 2622 domains into
> 178 rules!!!
> > Ramdon/tracking hosts tags removed!
> (...)
>
> Real big work! Grats!
>
> But, for the sake of archiveness, and for one less dumb in the world,
> why you use rawbody on those rules instead of uri?
>
>
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
--On Wednesday, December 03, 2003 09:31:24 -0500 Chris Santerre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What version of Bigevil do you have? 1.51 has fixed 2 typos in 141 and
> 153. I had '.com||somedome'
>
> empty pipes. si
--On Wednesday, December 03, 2003 09:31:24 -0500 Chris Santerre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What version of Bigevil do you have? 1.51 has fixed 2 typos in 141 and
153. I had
'.com||somedome'
empty pipes. site updated within minutes. You got version 1.5 I expect :)
Yep. updated to 1.52.
Thanks!
idays!!
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'David B Funk'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 6:40 AM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG
It got filtered :/
> -Original Message-
> From: David B Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:59 AM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003,
December 02, 2003 5:43 PM
> To: Chris Santerre; 'Marc Steuer'; 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>
>
>
>
> --On Tuesday, December 02, 2003 17:22:00 -0500 Chris Santerre
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:07 PM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>
>
>
> I've been using your popcorn, weeds and nov2rules.cf ru
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:56:15 -0500
Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
> ALL EVILRULES FILES HAVE BEEN COMBINED!! 2622 domains into 178 rules!!!
> Ramdon/tracking hosts tags removed!
(...)
Real big work! Grats!
But, for the sake of archiveness, and for one less dumb in the world,
why
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> BIG HUGE NEWS
>
> A major breakthrough has taken place
>
> ALL EVILRULES FILES HAVE BEEN COMBINED!! 2622 domains into 178 rules!!!
> Ramdon/tracking hosts tags removed!
>
> They only increase spamd memory by 1 meg!!! 1 meg!
>
> You read corre
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 15:29:37 -0600 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Tuesday, December 02, 2003 16:26:11 -0500 Vee Persaud
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > BIG HUGE NEWS
>
> > This seems awesome. If I never used EvilRules before, is it easy t
Thanks Chris - great work!
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre
>
>
> BIG HUGE NEWS
>
> A major breakthrough has taken place
>
> ALL EVILRULES FILES HAVE BEEN COMBINED!! 2622 domains into
> 178 rules!!! Ramdon/tracking hosts tags removed!
>
> They only incr
--On Tuesday, December 02, 2003 17:22:00 -0500 Chris Santerre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ALL EVILRULES FILES HAVE BEEN COMBINED!! 2622 domains into
178 rules!!!
> Ramdon/tracking hosts tags removed!
Thanks a lot for your work on this.
BigEvilList_74 hit on a message we received from the
Fina
I can only think to say muhahahaha... Thanks for the work on this
Chris!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Chris Santerre
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 3:56 PM
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVI
> > ALL EVILRULES FILES HAVE BEEN COMBINED!! 2622 domains into
> 178 rules!!!
> > Ramdon/tracking hosts tags removed!
>
> Thanks a lot for your work on this.
>
> BigEvilList_74 hit on a message we received from the
> Financial Executives
> Institute because it contained ...fasb.org. Is the F
Chris Santerre wrote:
BIG HUGE NEWS
Looks like these will be taking a big huge bite out of my spam! Cool. 3
out of the first 4 spams to hit my SA install triggered a BigEvilList rule.
Thanks for the effort you put into it.
Now to see if the payment terms mean that I can write off purchase
Chris,
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Chris Santerre
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:56 PM
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
> BIG HUGE NEWS
> A major breakthrough has taken place
> ALL EVILRULE
Chris Santerre. I genuflect! Thanks for the effort. I must
decline the hockey game; I live in the middle of basketball country and
would have to make quite a pilgrimage to get to a game of any caliber.
Would you settle for my switching from cokes to hot chocolates with
coffee mate for a week
--On Tuesday, December 02, 2003 16:26:11 -0500 Vee Persaud
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BIG HUGE NEWS
This seems awesome. If I never used EvilRules before, is it easy to
start using it ? Do I have to modify any other config files ?
nope. just drop it in the /etc/m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BIG HUGE NEWS
>
> A major breakthrough has taken place
>
> ALL EVILRULES FILES HAVE BEEN COMBINED!! 2622 domains into 178
> rules!!! Ramdon/tracking hosts tags removed!
>
> They only increase spamd memory by 1 meg!!! 1 meg!
>
> You read correctly! Every ev
76 matches
Mail list logo
