On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: > OK I have issues: > > > promotion.entertainment.com (70) > > a1524.g.akmaitech.net (82) > > and service.bfast.com (150) > > Up until now, no one has really done anything with hosts. This is kind > of the first instance where it will make a large impact. I'm sure no one > has ever complained to these hosts. We have all been complaining about > ISPs where the email comes from, not image/web hosting of spammers.
That's not strictly true. SpamCop sends reports to domains whose URLs are mentioned in spam, if the spam-submitter asks SpamCop to do so. > So I have a VERY important question: > > Leave these domains in, email gets marked as spam. > > or, > > Take them out of the list. Spammers will continue to use. > > Yup, not sure what to do. ANY ideas welcome. I could break these out to > a seperate rule for commenting out. This seems like the best. The Tao of SpamAssassin would seem to indicate that you assign them to one or more separate rules, and actually run the GA to give them a score based on their likelyhood of appearing in spam, rather than including them in a ruleset that is given a blanket fixed score of 3.0. > I went thru my spam corpa (I got an english lesson today!) It's "corpora," actually ... spelling flames normally being a no-no, but you seem to be interested. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
