> -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Rosenman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:30 PM > To: Bart Schaefer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!! > > > > > --On Thursday, December 04, 2003 13:26:27 -0800 Bart Schaefer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Mark Muller wrote: > > > >> promotion.entertainment.com (70) > >> a1524.g.akmaitech.net (82) > >> and service.bfast.com (150) > >> > >> Personally, I'll be whitelisting ticketmaster rather than removing > >> akmaitech :P I hate those guys. > > > > I presume you mean "akamaitech". What have you got against > Akamai? All > > they do is distributed asset hosting for high-volume web > access, as far as > > I know. Heck, even SpamCop uses some services from Akamai. > and symantec, and others. (We have an Akamai cluster at the > ISP I work for). > > That is the problem we are now facing. Would a spammer need high volume web access? My corpa says yes. I obviously can't tag this now. I removed the first 2, but I have left bfast.com and xmr3.com in for now. I may remove tomorrow. I need to think about some things tonight. I'm thinking these will go in a comment out rule. Mabye a rule 999 that is scored .01 so people can see it had one of these and report it to the host?
1.58a is up. Proper time (PM). Changes are just listed in this post. When I actually start updating this with new domains, strict testing is going to be done. I'm not liking these hosts playing both sides of the field. --Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
