On Dec 4, 2003 at 17:14, Damian Gerow wrote: >Yes, a spammer would need high availability. But so does Microsoft, Apple, >CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation), etc. Again, just because an image >is hosted by Akamai doesn't even mean that Akamai is aware of this -- it >just means that someone who may or may not be paying Akamia either found an >image hosted by them, or put an image up, and is referencing it in their >spam.
On the other hand, it's just like rejecting mail from all dynamic IPs, spammy IP blocks, and so on. (I'm against that. A single IP should be listed if it actually is a spam source, but not wholesale dynamic blocks!) >It's tough, but your decision is simple: Zero False Positives means that >these sites can't be listed. I agree. -- Satya. <URL:http://www.thesatya.com/> Here be dragons. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
