Em Qua, 2003-07-30 às 22:49, Justin Mason escreveu:
> Raul Dias writes:
> >BTW, you don't need to localize $_ .
> >$_ is already localized per block {}.
>
> !? are you sure?
I should have gone sleep before written that. :)
The bahaviour is not the same to subroutines. So Mark were right in
locali
Raul Dias writes:
>BTW, you don't need to localize $_ .
>$_ is already localized per block {}.
!? are you sure?
--j.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are
Em Qua, 2003-07-30 às 21:05, Phil Iovino escreveu:
> > But I would agree that those who don't speak Perl should not
> > attempt to
> > write their own eval functions. (Basically, "if you don't
> > speak Perl, don't
> > try writing some Perl. Especially if it's going to affect
> > your mail del
Em Qua, 2003-07-30 às 18:14, Mark escreveu:
[...]
> sub check_for_blackholed_recipients {
> local $_;
> my ($self) = @_;
>($_ = $self->get('ToCc')) =~ s/\(.*?\)//g;
> return (check_for_blackholes ((m/([EMAIL PROTECTED](?:[\w.-]+\.)+\w+)/g)));
> }
BTW, you don't need to localize $_
> Hey, lots of people don't know Perl. Maybe they've been
> concentrating on C,
> or Python, or they're too busy with becoming expert at the
> ins and outs of
> their MTA, MDA, and related systems. It doesn't make them
> "blithering idiots".
>
> But I would agree that those who don't speak Pe
At 7/30/03 01:35 PM , Chris Santerre wrote:
> If you don't speak Perl, then learning it should be your
> first step in
> trying to write any new eval rules. And learning Perl is
> outside the scope
> of any SA or rule-writing documentation.
Ah! So the first thing of eval test should be "Perl for b
- Original Message -
From: "Yorkshire Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "spamassassin list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 7:41 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [RD] rule discussion
At 7/30/03 10:29 AM , Yorkshire Dave wrote:
>I managed to figu
> -Original Message-
> From: Kai MacTane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:12 PM
> To: spamassassin list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [RD] rule discussion
>
>
> At 7/30/03 10:29 AM , Yorkshire Dave wrote:
>
> >I managed to figure
At 7/30/03 10:29 AM , Yorkshire Dave wrote:
I managed to figure how to write my own eval test by reading the source
code. Anyone who isn't at a level where they can do that really
shouldn't be trying to, or they're going to shoot themselves in the
foot. I'm not trying to dissuade anyone from tryin
> hmm, eval tests for idiots, kinda sounds like loaded shotguns for
> idiots, should reduce the idiot count but is that really what is
> desired? :)
Oh, I'd be quite happy with less idiots in the world ;o)
Wait, was that out loud?
-id
---
Th
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 15:13, Chris Santerre wrote:
> 3) This seems to be the topic recently. People would like to get a little
> better then simple rule writing. I haven't looked into writing eval tests at
> all. I think there is a good reason why there is little to no info on this.
> Devs don't n
> -Original Message-
> From: David Cary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] [RD] rule discussion
>
>
> Dear people annoyed at spam,
>
> I have an idea for a few rules, but I don't have any idea how
> to implement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Chris,
Friday, July 25, 2003, 7:09:32 AM, you wrote:
CS> Well I've done another update on the rules site. Some great rules
CS> submitted again. Lots I want to incorporate myself.
Agreed. I've captured a few that I've added to my user_prefs. Th
>> Secondly we never clarified if it was ok to discuss rules here in
>> mass. I can't help it. Seeing all these rules has got me wanting to
>> discuss them, and the posts regarding them will no doubt increase. So
>> shall we continue to use SAtalk? I think we should. Maybe just put
>> [RD] in the
> -Original Message-
> From: Kai MacTane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 11:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] [RD] rule discussion
>
>
> At 7/25/03 07:09 AM , Chris Santerre wrote:
> >Well I've done ano
At 7/25/03 07:09 AM , Chris Santerre wrote:
Well I've done another update on the rules site. Some great rules
submitted again. Lots I want to incorporate myself. I have received a few
rules that score points for bounced emails. What is everyone's take on this?
Yes bounces can be generated by spa
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 15:09, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Well I've done another update on the rules site. Some great rules
> submitted again. Lots I want to incorporate myself. I have received a
> few rules that score points for bounced emails. What is everyone's
> take on this?
>
> Yes bounces can b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Where is the list of custom rules? I'd like to see it.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 10:09:32AM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>Well I've done another update on the rules site. Some great rules
>submitted again. Lots I want to incorporate myself.
18 matches
Mail list logo
