> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kai MacTane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:12 PM
> To: spamassassin list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [RD] rule discussion
> 
> 
> At 7/30/03 10:29 AM , Yorkshire Dave wrote:
> 
> >I managed to figure how to write my own eval test by reading 
> the source
> >code. Anyone who isn't at a level where they can do that really
> >shouldn't be trying to, or they're going to shoot themselves in the
> >foot. I'm not trying to dissuade anyone from trying to learn, but
> >there's a lot more involved in writing an eval than there is 
> in writing
> >a rule, a lot more ways to get it wrong.
> 
> I'd agree with this. If you speak Perl, it isn't very 
> difficult to figure 
> out how to write these functions -- simply looking at one or 
> two of the 
> existing ones will give you the idea.
> 
> If you don't speak Perl, then learning it should be your 
> first step in 
> trying to write any new eval rules. And learning Perl is 
> outside the scope 
> of any SA or rule-writing documentation.
> 
>                                                  --Kai MacTane


Ah! So the first thing of eval test should be "Perl for blithering Idiots."
:)
Which I suppose is equally dangerous.

Second rule of eval test, is never talking about fight club. 

--chris :)
 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to