Todd Seeleman wrote:
I'm running spamd/spamc v 2.55 on a Compaq DS20 running Tru64 UNIX v
5.1b. It processes ~ 5,500 pieces of email per day. Every week or so the
system slows to a point where I must reboot. I believe I've eliminated all
causes other than the spamd process. I've throttled i
I
recommend you follow one of these guides, they both use
SpamAssassin
CREATING A SPAMFILTER RELAY SERVER
http://www.geocities.com/scottlhenderson/spamfilter.html
Fairly-Secure
Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and
DCC
http://www.flakshack.com/a
ECTED] On
> Behalf Of Dan Kennedy
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:03 AM
> To: Dustin O Williams; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin as a Filter then Forward
> Mail to MS Exchange
>
> Try MailScanner. That's what we use. It works well for jus
Try MailScanner. That's what we use. It works well for just relaying
mail onto an exchange server.
Spamassassin ties into it, and it's pretty easy to configure.
http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/
-Original Message-
From: Dustin O Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesd
http://postfix.cnc.bc.ca/twiki/bin/view/Main/SpamAssassinTaggingOnly is what
I use with Postfix to do pretty much the same thing. Very simple and it
works.
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 05:06, Marc Morgan wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I have been trying to install spam assassin on my OpenBSD3.1 machine. Qmail
is
> installed and has been patch with QMAILQUEUE. I installed the latest
version,
> but had errors wh
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:28:00 +0200 Marc Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I have been trying to install spam assassin on my OpenBSD3.1 machine. Qmail
> is installed and has been patch with QMAILQUEUE. I installed the latest
> version, but had errors when starting spamd or spamas
At Wed Jan 14 14:13:27 2004, Sally Denhart wrote:
[Apologies to the list if this has been anwswered already -- I've
checked in the archives and can't see a reply to this. I'm a couple
of days behind with my mail.]
> I just installed Spam Assassin 2.61 on my Solaris 7 box. It
> interfaces with
At Wed Jan 14 17:54:19 2004, Todd Seeleman wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm running spamd/spamc v 2.55 on a Compaq DS20 running Tru64 UNIX v
> 5.1b. It processes ~ 5,500 pieces of email per day. Every week or so the
> system slows to a point where I must reboot. I believe I've eliminated all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2003 08:21 Paul Hutchings wrote:
> I played with the howto on openandhome, it seems really simple to get
> spamassassin up and running on windows, the problem seems to be finding a
> Windows MTA that can take an email, pipe it out then re-inj
: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Matt Andreko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 October 2003 19:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32
I'd be very much for this. As much as I like unix, I
On 2003-10-01 13:26:52 -0500, Your Own ISP .com wrote:
> Since there seems to be a ton of activity on this list and near zero to do
> with SA on Windows, I have created list specific to SpamAssassin on W32
> platforms.
Good! Now please all of you who use Outlook, can't quote and send
HTML mails pl
Not trying to pick fights, this is not a flame just an IMO.
I'm not sure how I feel about Spamassassin porting to Windows. SA is a great
example of why Open Source is a superior method of programming. Porting a
free binary for Windows seems a little against the spirit of the OS
philosophy. However
I'd be very much for this. As much as I like unix, I think that there
is a need for this type of technology on the Windows platform as well.
Some companies don't use linux because they're not used to it. However
they still want anti-spam, and like the spamassassin name, since they
have read abo
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Pineau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 2:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32
>
>
> On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 13:26, Your Own ISP .com wrote:
> > Si
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 13:26, Your Own ISP .com wrote:
> Since there seems to be a ton of activity on this list and near zero
> to do with SA on Windows, I have created list specific to SpamAssassin
> on W32 platforms.
>
>
>
> I searched for this first but did not find anything. I would love to
> "BS" == Brian Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BS> I notice that many recent viruses are using faked return email
BS> addresses.
BS> Consequently, when one of these infected emails is detected by spam
BS> assassin, many systems appear to reply to the fake email address with
BS> an "exact"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello AltGrendel,
Wednesday, July 23, 2003, 11:41:34 AM, you wrote:
A> Ok, I've seen lots of requests and no responce for a SpamAssassin
A> rules wiki. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't recall any responses saying
A> "I have one here".
I didn't have one
Alexander Prohorenko wrote:
[...]
Normally, everything works just fine, though, testing every message
gets the server load high, but it's still okay. However, when the
link of the server goes down, and mail spool gets 50 or more messages
this cause server to stop answering any connectio
s Justin Mason wrote:
log cycling. Restart spamd after the logs are cycled.
Interesting. This could explain a very recent anomaly with Postfix
2.0.12/amavisd-new 20030314 (for those who don't know, amavisd-new uses
SpamAssassin's Perl library instead of spamd.)
Whereas I'd never ever had any p
Any log entries, error messages or the
like?
--Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCTCameron Technical Services,
Inc.http://www.camerontech.com/(512)
454-3200
- Original Message -
From:
Carmine DiMascio
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:44 AM
Subje
Carmine DiMascio said:
> Hi everyone
>
> We've been using spam assassin in production now for 2 weeks.
>
> Monday morning after both weekends we cease to get mail.
>
> The only way to get it is to shut down spam assassin, have everyone
> download there mail, the once most mail has been downloa
lto:johnny@;mail.booksys.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:06
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin Installer
Fine, see if I contribute anymore to the list.
The reason I don't want to install it sitewide is not only the concerns I
listed about false
Fine, see if I contribute anymore to the list.
The reason I don't want to install it sitewide is not only the concerns I
listed about false-positives, but also because we're a tiny company who
can't afford licensing fees for Razor, etc.
Anyway, script is hereby public domain. If you don't like it
On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 15:22, Jeremy Turner wrote:
> I have been working on installing SpamAssassin site-wide, but wanted to
> constrain it to a test group before launching it. I'm also using exim
> as my MTA. I created a system filter in exim that said basically if
> $recipients contains "[EMAIL
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 17:49, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:03:18PM -0500, Johnny L. Wales wrote:
> > Anyhoo, I wrote a little perl script that takes the name of a user and
> > automagically installs SpamAssassin for them. It's not quite ready for
> > primetime, but I thought
I was excited, then I saw the script. :)
This will install many instances of SA on the system. While it will work, it
just doesn't seem right. It would be better to install sitewide and then
just customize the calling of SA in users local procmail file. This way you
just have to copy the procmail
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:03:18PM -0500, Johnny L. Wales wrote:
> Anyhoo, I wrote a little perl script that takes the name of a user and
> automagically installs SpamAssassin for them. It's not quite ready for
> primetime, but I thought I'd send in what I had and maybe get some
> comments on it.
> That's interesting, because I don't use the seekable patch...
>
> and, my vpopmail v5.2.1 configure settings are simply
> ./configure \
> --enable-defaultquota=10485760 \
> --enable-many-domains=n \
> --enable-logging=v
>
> I'm not quite sure what the seakable patch does, but information found a
ehalf Of Dave
Weiner
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spam assassin with vpopmail howto
> With so many people asking how to use spamassassin for Individual users
when
> you're using qmail and vpopmail, i decided to implement it, and
> With so many people asking how to use spamassassin for Individual users
when
> you're using qmail and vpopmail, i decided to implement it, and here are
the
> results:
>
> # add a user to the domain
> > ~vpopmail/bin/vadduser [EMAIL PROTECTED] passwd
>
>
> then you have to decide if you want to d
Olivier Nicole wrote:
>
> > Describe PURE_PROFIT Profit is dirty, not pure.
>
> I avoid such jokes in French translation, becaus eI am not sure it
> would be perceived well by all French speaking communities.
Not to mention the impact the joke had here:
http://www.talkbiz.com/assassin.html>.
-
Hi
> Describe PURE_PROFIT Profit is dirty, not pure.
I avoid such jokes in French translation, becaus eI am not sure it
would be perceived well by all French speaking communities.
I think that those describe could change when SA become more mature.
> However, I do agree that many tests descri
On 6 Apr 2002 the voices made Craig Hughes write:
> On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 05:21, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> > Easier... h... I dunno, I think most people would find any working non
> > CVS-solution easier than having to panic while trying to figure out what the
> > heck CVS is. :-)
> Well,
Well, ETA for 2.2 is ASAP, so soon you won't have to know what CVS is to
get this stuff.
C
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 05:21, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> Easier... h... I dunno, I think most people would find any working non
> CVS-solution easier than having to panic while trying to figure out wha
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002 the voices made Robert Fleming write:
> --On Friday, April 5, 2002 6:49 PM +0200 "Tony L. Svanstrom"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumoured to have written:
>
> > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 the voices made Chris MacLeod write:
> >
> >> I want to do something along the lines of dropping ever
--On Friday, April 5, 2002 6:49 PM +0200 "Tony L. Svanstrom"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumoured to have written:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 the voices made Chris MacLeod write:
>
>> I want to do something along the lines of dropping everything over a
>> certain score (ex >20) then anything less than that
Well, I don't know about despicable, but certainly it would have been
polite for him to contact me before publically badmouthing me and
encouraging wide distribution of his misrepresentations about my
character and my work.
C
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 22:29, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> Furthermore, his
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 02:27:37PM -0500, Wandrer wrote:
> FYI:
>
> The Mail Killer
> In this case the culprit was an alleged spam filter system called "Spam
> Assassin."
> Any person that recommends this software should be required to re-take
> their IQ test, to see if they still have one.
> A
I'm probably one of those email admins he hates.
A couple months ago, our company's execs decided they were tired of getting offers for
"vi*gra" and "h*t ho*ny te*ns". I set up spam-assassin to mark and deliver emails. I
told the users what we were doing and told them to tell me when email was
Here is a solution to people against spam assassin - rename it to:
Mail
Analysis
Protection
Scanner for
Kids email
Contaminated with
Unsolicited
Filth
People cannot argue against protecting kids from porn and unsolicited mail.
(And have lots of fun with the initials)
Tongue in Cheekily,
Jay Hod
Same here.
SA RULES.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tyler Hardison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:13 PM
> To: Nick Fisher; Rose, Bobby; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin
>
>
> On 4/
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 the voices made Craig R Hughes write:
> NB it is possible to have scores >100, in theory. Quite likely in fact if you
> use blacklists.
>
> In theory, communism works, in theory.
In theory, anyone using my "code" should be able to copy&paste his way into a
solutions if he fi
what to
> do with it.
>
> Tyler.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tyler Hardison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:13 PM
> To: Nick Fisher; Rose, Bobby; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin
>
>
>
On 4/5/02 12:00 PM, "Nick Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think his rant is realy directed at people who setup SA to automatically
> reject/delete mail that hits the threshold score. He doesn't seem to realise
> that's not the way your supposed to do it. I might point out that I am the
> p
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rose,
> Bobby
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin
>
>
> One work... Uninformed. Based on the content of the
Oh dear.
Annother so called expert blaming the tools rather than the workmen. If
someone has installed SA without propper whitelists and consideration real
mail does get blocked. Duh! Don't blame SA for something that an admin did.
When I first installed SA all sorts of things were incorrectly tag
One work... Uninformed. Based on the content of the e-rag, he has
issues far beyond SA. My impression is that the various spam software
being used by systems is either outright refusing his e-rag or in SA's
case tagging it. Maybe his email address should become a spamtroll
address ;-)
-O
ECTED]
> To: Chris MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spam-assassin & procmail
>
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 the voices made Chris MacLeod write:
>
> > I want to do something along
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 the voices made Chris MacLeod write:
> I want to do something along the lines of dropping everything over a
> certain score (ex >20) then anything less than that but still over my spam
> threshold putting it into a separate folder to go through later.
(Consider this pseudo-co
50 matches
Mail list logo
