On Понедельник, 5 Январь 2004 10:40, Robert Menschel wrote:
> Hello Alexander,
>
> Sunday, January 4, 2004, 7:43:59 PM, you wrote:
>
> AL> I have written some tests and don't know what is the score set for
> these AL> tests. Can some one make the suggestion how to score tests ?
>
> I have several a
At 09:43 AM 1/5/04 +0600, Alexander Litvinov wrote:
I have written some tests and don't know what is the score set for these
tests. Can some one make the suggestion how to score tests ?
My opinions are in my rule-writing guide, section 2.4
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/SA-rules-howto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alexander,
Sunday, January 4, 2004, 7:43:59 PM, you wrote:
AL> I have written some tests and don't know what is the score set for these
AL> tests. Can some one make the suggestion how to score tests ?
I have several algorithms I use. Note that
At 04:24 PM 11/25/03 +0800, Fritz Mesedilla wrote:
What happened to this mail?
Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- --
0.3 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not i
http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=show&file=faq04.017.htp
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Alan Munday
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 4:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Score
>
>
>
> Just had a
At 23:01 23/11/2003 +, Alan Munday wrote:
Thanks Simon
I am using stars as I used the Advosys how-to as my starting point. I've
started playing with the scripts and wondered if SA left any variables set
e.g. hit value, that I could use rather than re-reading the file as I
thought this would be
Hi,
I believe this is an FAQ. But, basically, it rounds that number to one
decimal place. So, if your score was really 4.978, it would list 4 stars,
be below the 5.0 threshold, but round to 5.0 on the "hits" indicator.
Hope that helps,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Alan,
Sunday, November 23, 2003, 1:57:43 PM, you wrote:
AM> Just had a mail in which had different *'s and score. ...
AM> X-Spam-Level:
AM> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0 tests=...
AM> Is there a simple explanation for this?
Very simple -- hits is rounded to one decimal pl
as I separate
non-spam, from marked and delivered (5+) and marked and dumped into a
spamtrap (10+).
Regards
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Simon Byrnand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2003 22:54
To: Alan Munday; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Score
>Is there
Thanks...
Didn't think to look at the FAQs (Which I normally do).
Shows you what happens when you act on impulse.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Martin Radford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2003 22:34
To: Alan Munday
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk]
At 21:57 23/11/2003 +, Alan Munday wrote:
Just had a mail in which had different *'s and score. I was expecting these
to be the same as I egrep the file and count the stars in post
processing.
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,HTML_30_40,
HT
At Sun Nov 23 21:57:43 2003, Alan Munday wrote:
>
>
> Just had a mail in which had different *'s and score. I was expecting these
> to be the same as I egrep the file and count the stars in post
> processing.
>
>
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_2
The score rounds up. If you pass the -e option spamassassin will exit
with a non-zero exit code if it spam, but not with a hit count.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Alan Munday
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 4:58 PM
> To: [EM
Hmmm... only a guess. The 'stars' account for the 4 in 4.something and
the hits round up.
Jennifer
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Munday
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 4:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How can I add points for messages with empty bodies?
> Assume the Lines: header is unreliable.
> Please CC me if you reply.
Hmmm... this should work.
rawbody __SOMETHING /\S/
meta BODY_EMPTY !__SOMETHING
score BODY_EMPTY0.5
Daniel
> -Original Message-
> From: jpf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] score based on time of day rec'd?
>
>
> I was wondering if there are any tests that score based on
> what time of day
> the mail is being rec
Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Read the archives under the subject "Mail arrival time may be a criteria".
> The following is a useful link:
>
> http://www.gryzor.com/tools/spamstats-pics.html
It is only marginally useful at best, IMO. SpamAssassin would be very
likely to assign such
Read the archives under the subject "Mail arrival time may be a criteria".
The following is a useful link:
http://www.gryzor.com/tools/spamstats-pics.html
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: jpf
> I was wondering if there are any tests that score based on
> what time of day
> the ma
Doug Wolfgram writes:
>I recently received the following message which gets a score of 0. It also
>says tests=none. Does that mean it spoofed spamassassin?
No. I would guess the filter could not find the rules files, that's
a symptom of that...
--j.
--
Dinter To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Sco
;t do this, your mailer does.
Does the level have a cutoff? Can I actually have a header with like 30+ '*'
in it? :)
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:32:16PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any way to modify the header that spam assassin puts out so that
> there is a key word like "low", "medium", "high" based on the score, so
> that rules can be set up in the .mailfilterrc accordingly?
There should be a F
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I wanted to have a more granular control over the spam tagging of
> spamassassin. Basically what I want to do is something like this
>
> 1. If score < 4 do nothing
> 2. If 4 < score < 6 tag mail as low spam this should deliver to the
> default mailbox, but tagged a
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:39:49PM -0400, David Corbin wrote:
> Is there a way to have this summary added (at the end) for non-spam
> messages, so that I can see why certain spam messages are no being
> detected, and by how many points they're not being detected?
spamassassin -t
:) It adds a
Did you restart spamd?
C
Harry Putnam wrote:
HP> default info for COPY_DVDS:
HP> body COPY_DVDS /copy.{1,20}dvd/i
HP> describe COPY_DVDS Containts 'Copy DVDs'
HP> score COPY_DVDS 2.746
HP>
HP>
HP> I've attempted to over ride it with:
HP>
HP> ca
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> default info for COPY_DVDS:
> body COPY_DVDS /copy.{1,20}dvd/i
> describe COPY_DVDS Containts 'Copy DVDs'
> score COPY_DVDS 2.746
>
>
> I've attempted to over ride it with:
>
> cat /etc/mail/spam/local.c
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 11:55:07AM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> cat /etc/mail/spam/local.cf
>
> do you mean /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf?
yup
>> I know that /etc/mail/spam/local.cf is being read because of other
>> rules showing up in messages.
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 11:55:07AM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
> cat /etc/mail/spam/local.cf
do you mean /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf?
> I know that /etc/mail/spam/local.cf is being read because of other
> rules showing up in messages. So what is wrong here?
Are you using spamc/d? Did you r
Nice feature! I'll add this to SA itself.
C
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 10:06, Mark Roedel wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:05 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [SAtalk] Score l
I'm not sure I've ever seen a non-spam message with a score higher than
10. There are a few 10's in the nonspam corpus, but no 11s or higher.
C
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 08:05, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> I am wanting to define SA scores based on filter sensitivity terms like
> High, Medi
> -Original Message-
> From: CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Score levels
>
>
> I am wanting to define SA scores based on filter sensitivity
> terms like High, Medium, and
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> I am wanting to define SA scores based on filter sensitivity terms like
> High, Medium, and Low where High would be the most agressive blocking of
> Spam to Low which is the most lenient. This would be easier for my
> customers to unders
32 matches
Mail list logo
