I'm not sure I've ever seen a non-spam message with a score higher than 10. There are a few 10's in the nonspam corpus, but no 11s or higher.
C On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 08:05, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote: > I am wanting to define SA scores based on filter sensitivity terms like > High, Medium, and Low where High would be the most agressive blocking of > Spam to Low which is the most lenient. This would be easier for my > customers to understand. Something like: > > Spam Filter Sensitivity Choices: > High = block messages that have an SA score of 5 or higher > Medium = block messages that have an SA score of 10 or higher > Low = block messages that have an SA score of 15 or higher > > Would you all consider these SA score ranges to be accurate in your > experience? Or should they be tighter or loosened up even more? Maybe 15 > is still not high enough for a Low sensitivity? Would 20 be better or lower > at 12? Others with more experience with SA may have a better feel for such > things. Any input from your experience would be much appreciated. > > Thanks, > Ed. > > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
